Query about covenant theology

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

ReformedAnglican

Guest
Firstly, I can guarantuee at least two schools of thought on this issue both of which are Covenantal - Amillennial interpretations and Postmillennial interpretations. I hold to the latter.

Secondly, they have a very definite spiritual interpretation for today about faithfulness to God.

Thirdly, when I get in trouble I turn to Calvin, Gill and Henry:

1. Gill = http://www.studylight.org/com/geb/view.cgi?book=de&chapter=030
2. Henry = http://www.studylight.org/com/mhc-com/view.cgi?book=de&chapter=030
3. Calvin =
i. Verses 1-10,15-20 http://www.ccel.org/c/calvin/comment3/comm_vol05/htm/x.xii.htm
ii. Verses 11-14 http://www.ccel.org/c/calvin/comment3/comm_vol03/htm/v.xxx.htm
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟34,309.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, I'd say "yes, they apply to the church of their time." Y'see, for Presbyterians the Mosaic Covenant is part of the Covenant of Grace. The Church is embedded in Israel at this point. That would make these blessings and curses God's own care for the well-being of His people and for His own reputation among the nations. He's setting up a nation for these things. The nation exists to move His people to a greater reverence for Him.

The persistence of an individual church is itself dependent on such things as well. When the church quits upholding God's morals in the world, it's headed for its own closure. We certainly do have a Sacrifice (as Moses did in shadows) for when we go astray from these commands; but the commands and warnings also serve to tell us where our sinfulness naturally leads: away from our God.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.