No such thing as a literal 1,000 year millennial kingdom on this earth found in scripture, it's a fabricated man made fairy taleThis is after the 1,000 years mentioned a chapter before!
Upvote
0
No such thing as a literal 1,000 year millennial kingdom on this earth found in scripture, it's a fabricated man made fairy taleThis is after the 1,000 years mentioned a chapter before!
You try to remove the future "literal events" that will take place on this earth, this earth will be literally destroyed by fire at the return of Jesus Christ in his second comingThe comparison is the judgement of God - not the details.
Let me see (below)Revelation 20:1-6 Isnt A Millennial Kingdom On This Earth, Dont Be Deceived
Can you find the things claimed by those teaching a Literal 1,000 year Millennial Kingdom On This Earth in Revelation 20:1-6 below?
1.) Physical Earthly Kingdom?
2.) Physical Earthly Throne?
3.) Physical Mortal Humans?
The Above Claims (Don't Exist)
I already said that the 1,000 years may be symbolic. Is to the real number, I prefer to wait and see, instead of speculate whether it will be literally a thounsand, or any other time span.Revelation 20:1-6 Is 100% In The Lords (Spiritual) Angel, Heaven, Devil, Satan, The Souls, The Dead, God, Christ
100% Spiritual Realm, No "Literal" Time
The thousand years are there.Revelation 20:1-6KJV
1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
A world without Satan is there.3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.
Since there is no word pro "person" in Hebrew nor Greek, speakers of these languages (including the biblical authors) used other terms to express this concept. One of them is soul (used mainly in the OT, but you can find it also in Rm 13:1). More frequent in the NT is name (be should not believe in a name, but in the person of Christ, whose name is Jesus), another term is ”face“ (the term ”face to face“) can (almost?) every time translated as »personal«).4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
So they reign not over unbelievers (which are still dead), but in a world with only believers in it.5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
I changed the emphasis in this verse: You overlooked the word »priests«. A priest makes a connection between mortal men and the gods (on monotheistic religion, i.e. Jewish priests, between men and God). Our priest is Jesus, an we should be priests to the non-believers (leading them to Jesus, the High Priest of the New Covenant). When the overcoming ones are priests, there will also be persons they give a connection to God (whatever that means in detail).6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
It will be literally destroyed. If you (in the manner of the OT prophets) lump together everything after the second coming, you might even say this will be in the second coming of Christ. But the details in revelation show a time gap (less than the gab between the first and the second coming, which was hidden in the OT times -. so no OT prophecy covers the history between the ascension of Jesus and His return).You try to remove the future "literal events" that will take place on this earth, this earth will be literally destroyed by fire at the return of Jesus Christ in his second coming
A world without Satan is there.
"False"So we have a reign of the overcoming believers (the persons mentioned in Verse 4) on earth.
False, you aren't going to erase the "Many" verse in God's words that clearly show that when Jesus returns its (Fire Time-The End)Let me see (below)
I already said that the 1,000 years may be symbolic. Is to the real number, I prefer to wait and see, instead of speculate whether it will be literally a thounsand, or any other time span.
The thousand years are there.
A world without Satan is there.
Since there is no word pro "person" in Hebrew nor Greek, speakers of these languages (including the biblical authors) used other terms to express this concept. One of them is soul (used mainly in the OT, but you can find it also in Rm 13:1). More frequent in the NT is name (be should not believe in a name, but in the person of Christ, whose name is Jesus), another term is ”face“ (the term ”face to face“) can (almost?) every time translated as »personal«).
So we have a reign of the overcoming believers (the persons mentioned in Verse 4) on earth.
So they reign not over unbelievers (which are still dead), but in a world with only believers in it.
I changed the emphasis in this verse: You overlooked the word »priests«. A priest makes a connection between mortal men and the gods (on monotheistic religion, i.e. Jewish priests, between men and God). Our priest is Jesus, an we should be priests to the non-believers (leading them to Jesus, the High Priest of the New Covenant). When the overcoming ones are priests, there will also be persons they give a connection to God (whatever that means in detail).
As you see: It is perfect legitimate to interpret Rev 20:1-6 in the way I do. Maybe not in the way you have heard before.
I'm confused? So you want to say that Satan is bound by now? THis is nonsense.Satan Is Currently Bound For 1,000 Years Explained?
This is your interpretation, on which anything else you say is based (e.g. your interpretation of »souls« as spiritual and not persons, as souls are in Rom 13:1)."False"
The complete depiction of Revelation 20:1-6 is in the Lord's eternal spiritual realm of no time
It is wrong, if your interpretation is correct. But if your interpretation is not correct, this is true., the believers are "Souls" waiting in the spiritual, your claim they're on the earth is wrong
Well, there are as many verses in the OT that »clearly« show that when Jesus is borne on earth, there will be peace, that when he is resurrected, all other dead souls will be resurrected, and when he goes to heaven, the visible reign over every nation begins.False, you aren't going to erase the "Many" verse in God's words that clearly show that when Jesus returns its (Fire Time-The End)
Yes, with the detail that there are 1,000 years within this coming … like as there are up to yet about 2,000 within the ascension and end of our world (era) as described in Dan 7.When Jesus returns it will be fire in final judgment, up in smoke (The End)!
You erase Lk 17:26-28.Luke 17:29-30KJV
29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.
30 Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.
(The Souls) seen below, are they living on earth, or are they in the Lord's eternal spiritual?This is your interpretation, on which anything else you say is based (e.g. your interpretation of »souls« as spiritual and not persons, as souls are in Rom 13:1).
It is wrong, if your interpretation is correct. But if your interpretation is not correct, this is true.
They are souls that John could see.(The Souls) seen below, are they living on earth, or are they in the Lord's eternal spiritual?
I Agree, the southern hemisphere is a safe haven should nuclear war take place, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Argentina, Chile, etcFirstly, except when attempting to destroy military targets, most bombs will be air rather than ground, limiting the amount of fallout.
During the cold war we know the USSR did not target any Australian cities, so I doubt Russia has done so now, probably Pine Gap will be targeted, but that is a long way from where any Australians live, they are likely to be very few targets in the southern hemisphere.
So, the initial impact will be watching the impact in other countries, a day of praying for you all and getting ready in case a stray nuke does come out way.
Well, in case of a massive nuclear wall the South will be affected from radioactive fall-out, so there will be much cancer or even radiation syndrome for a long time.I Agree, the southern hemisphere is a safe haven should nuclear war take place, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Argentina, Chile, etc
How about the southern hemisphere will be the last to be directly effected in a nuclear war, are you happy now?Well, in case of a massive nuclear wall the South will be affected from radioactive fall-out, so there will be much cancer or even radiation syndrome for a long time.
Worse, he nuclear winter after a war may even come to the southern hemisphere.
And what will the Indians and Chinese do when they realize they will die because of all those nukes detonating in USA and Russia (and very probably, Europe)?
There may be survivors in Australia (depending how intense the nuclear war will be, and perhaps other parameters), but to call it a »safe haven« sounds either naïve or cynical.
Well, in case of a massive nuclear wall the South will be affected from radioactive fall-out, so there will be much cancer or even radiation syndrome for a long time.
Worse, he nuclear winter after a war may even come to the southern hemisphere.
And what will the Indians and Chinese do when they realize they will die because of all those nukes detonating in USA and Russia (and very probably, Europe)?
There may be survivors in Australia (depending how intense the nuclear war will be, and perhaps other parameters), but to call it a »safe haven« sounds either naïve or cynical.
Not gonna happen. Nobody is suicidal.How would a nuclear war between Russia and the US affect you?
Simulation and Explanation Youtube 4:08
Finally, a breath of reality here. Thank you.Hey guys. I am an ethnic Russian born and raised in what is now Ukraine. A lot of you speak without knowledge.
Not gonna happen. Nobody is suicidal.