Facts to disprove theory of evolution

[AV1611VET]

You could offer them heaven instead of threatening them with hell, but I suppose that's just not your style.

If I remember right, I was asked specifically if I believed she would end up in Hell.

You don't know the conversation, so let's just drop it.

 

[AV1611VET]

Scene:
A person is dying in hospital after a lifetime of physical suffering.
They're regarded as being a model citizen and an enormously caring human being, loved by thousands of their community.
They've spent a lifetime of caring for others.

AV1611VET: 'You're going to burn in hell'.

The person gasps their last breath .. and dies in agony front of AV1611VET's eyes.

He saunters away chuffed and mutters to himself: 'Yeah I really stuck it that sucker! Mission complete!

VERY SELDOM do I report someone.

This post I reported.

 

[AV1611VET]

AV, I think we both know that it's also possible for a person to be a theist and die and also go to the place where the Son doesn't shine.

That is correct.

So, harping as you do solely on the mindsets and outlooks and presence of atheists (many of whom are really Ex-Christians) probably isn't very productive, all things considered.

I was told she was an atheist, and asked specific questions, and gave specific answers.

Drop it, please.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

He will not be deterred by these comments he knows what he believes and why and he sticks with it.

What on God's green Earth made you think that I would be working to deter AV from what he believes with what I said?

 

[Estrid]

Have you not noticed that AV regularly brings on his dog and pony show whenever another creationist starts overplaying his hand? What's become of Aussie Pete since yesterday?

I've noticed that people with no
courtesy, or regard for forum
rules persist in disrupting and deraiing
with posts having no bearing on the topic.

I've also noticed those who act as enablers by responding

I've further noted that the inevitable result
is the modulators step in and close the thread
for multiple violations.

 

[Ophiolite]

VERY SELDOM do I report someone.

This post I reported.

Then you had best report this one also.

@SelfSim has captured exactly how your posts are perceived by myself and, I suspect, several others. You proffer an endless stream of vindictive, nasty critiques of science, of those who value of science, of Christians who disagree with you and when we complain you treat the complainants with snide, arrogant dismissal. Pehaps you do not realise that this is how your posts appear: you have now been informed.

 

[AV1611VET]

Then you had best report this one also.

Nope.

You're entitled to your opinion.

 

[partinobodycular]

Then he asked me if I thought she should burn in Hell for being an atheist, despite all the good she has done.

I'm curious, do you reject the premise of "once saved, always saved", which would seem to allow for someone who dies while professing atheism to still get to heaven?

And one other thing, what signifies that a person is in fact a Christian... the words that come out of their mouth, or the actions that come out of their heart? Because it seems to me that the former simply reflects their experience with the world, and the latter is actually the one that reflects their relationship with God.

 

[Estrid]

I'm curious, do you reject the premise of "once saved, always saved", which would seem to allow for someone who dies while professing atheism to still get to heaven?

And one other thing, what signifies that a person is in fact a Christian... the words that come out of their mouth, or the actions that come out of their heart? Because it seems to me that the former simply reflects their experience with the world, and the latter is actually the one that reflects their relationship with God.

Must you respond to posts that deliberstely violate
the statement of purpose.?

 

[Estrid]

I'm asking this thread be closed for
multiple violations.

 

[AV1611VET]

I'm curious, do you reject the premise of "once saved, always saved", which would seem to allow for someone who dies while professing atheism to still get to heaven?

Good question.

Thank you for asking it.

No, I do not reject the premise of "once saved, always saved."

Also known as: eternal security.

John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.

If a person gets saved, then dies professing atheism, I believe he is going to Heaven.

And one other thing, what signifies that a person is in fact a Christian... the words that come out of their mouth, or the actions that come out of their heart? Because it seems to me that the former simply reflects their experience with the world, and the latter is actually the one that reflects their relationship with God.

That's a toughy.

Some people define "Christian" as CHRIST FOLLOWER.

While others define "Christian" as CHRIST-LIKE.

Some accuse the CHRIST FOLLOWERS of "easy believeism."

While others accuse the CHRIST-LIKES as "legalists."

I personally think a Christian is one who is a CHRIST FOLLOWER, with the hope that one day he will be CHRIST-LIKE.

(If that makes sense.)

 

[AV1611VET]

Must you respond to posts that deliberstely violate the statement of purpose.?

"Deliberately"?

 

[partinobodycular]

Must you respond to posts that deliberstely violate
the statement of purpose.?

Sorry, my bad. Consider me properly chastised.

 

[HARK!]

MOD HAT ON

DUE TO MULTIPLE RULE VIOLATIONS

MOD HAT OFF​