1. The Gen 2 event is before Sinai - it claims to be at Creation week where only two humans exist for "mankind".
2. The Ex 16 text shows "exact day" compliance with the "sanctified and made it holy" statement in Gen 2:3
3. The EX 20:10 text shows that it is not the "Sabbath of man" but rather the "Sabbath of YHWH"
4. The IS 56 text shows gentiles specifically singled out for following that Gen 2 Sabbath
5. The IS 66:23 statement shows that it extends out for all eternity into the New Earth for "all mankind"
6. In Acts 13 it is GENTILES - not "Jews" asking for more Gospel preaching to be scheduled for "the NEXT Sabbath"
If we were Jews living before Christ, you would have a point.
That only works if one supposes that "only Jews know that Adam and Eve were humans , or the only humans on Earth in Gen 2"
That only works if one supposes that "God" (YHWH) in EX 20:10 cannot be allowed to be the God of someone who is not a Jew.
That only works if one supposes that the gentiles in Is 56:6-8 are Jews not gentiles
That only works if one supposes that in Is 66:23 gentiles are not to be included in the term "mankind" -- for all eternity in the New Earth
That only works if one supposes that the gentiles in Acts 13 -- are Jews not gentiles.
Notice that the speaker in the OP does not make any such assumptions
One person considers one day more sacred than another; another considers every day alike.
Rom 14:5
nope. "
one person observes one day above another while another observes them all... he who observes the day observes it to the Lord" Rom 14.
IT is a reference to the Bible approved list of holy days in Lev 23 and is compatible with the Gal 4:10-11 condemnation of a Christian that observes even one pagan holy day.
"So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another"
R 7:4
1 Cor 7:19 "
what matters is KEEPING the Commandments of God"
1 John 5:4 "
this is the LOVE of God that we KEEP His Commandments"
Eph 6:2 "
Honor your father and mother is the first Commandment WITH A promise"
I am not interested in the video,
The title of the thread - and the OP deal with "AN EXAMPLE of affirming the Sabbath Commandment while denying its detail".
The video is an EXAMPLE of a pro-Sunday pastor affirming the Sabbath commandment to an extent.
The point is that some of the VERY details that are affirmed about the Sabbath commandment are seen to be affirmed by pro-Sunday scholars as in the case of the video - and the Baptist Confession of Faith sectn 19, and the Westminster Confession of Faith sectn 19 and D.L. Moody and the Catholic Dies Domini and R.C Sproul, and C.H. Spurgeon and ...
Yet many oppose the Bible Sabbath when in dialogue with Adventists as IF - Adventist were the only one affirming those Sabbath-commandment related details.
I am just responding to your claims.
There is no point in trying to manipulate translations, I am able to check such statements. The word is "krinei", its not possible to translate as "observes" and no Bible translation (at least listed among the dozens on biblehub.com) does.
Thats OK, I have nothing against keeping the commandments of God, but not those who were not given to us and for our times
Is 66:23 says the Sabbath i for all mankind.
Mark 2:27 says the Sabbath is for mankind
Is 56:6-8 singles out gentiles specifically for Sabbath keeping
Acts 13 - shows us where gentiles wait for Jews to leave the synagogue - then ask Paul for "more gospel preaching" to be scheduled "The NEXT SABBATH" -- for them. Rather than the much-supposed "tomorrow as the gospel service you just told us about".
Yes, its factually right that the Mosaic Law has this commandment with a promise and it is the first such commandment.
And it is also true that the 5th commandment IS NOT the "first commandment with a promise" in Exodus, or in Genesis or in any book of Moses known to mankind.
It is only the first one with a promise in that unit of TEN where as Deut 5:22 says God spoke the ten "and added no more".
You skimmed past a lot of key details just then.
And next we see "why"
However, you are unable to defend the stretch that this sentence from Eph 6:2 means we are supposed to keep the whole Mosaic Law.
The point was in regard to "The TEN". Skimming past all the details leaves you with a bit of a rabbit trail just then.
You simply just put those verses together to create an illusion
Your skimming over the details above - is not helping your case just then. I am noting details you are determined to dismiss.
Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses...
...The apostles and elders met to consider this question...
Indeed.
Notice that they argue that part of the issue is solved by the fact that "Moses is preached every Sabbath in the synagogues" --
Yep that helped the church a lot since in Acts 13 and Acts 18 we see BOTH gentiles and Jews in the Synagogues "every Sabbath" as Acts 18;4 says - even in the case of Paul preaching the Gospel to gentiles and Jews.
www.biblegateway.com
www.biblegateway.com
www.biblegateway.com
