Some of us do care, and so we go shopping for better explanations than settling for those all too abruptly and all too often pulled out as strong claims for this or that. Where Gould is concerned, you might keep in mind that his "criticism" of evolutionary trees and the way those diagrams are conceptualized have certain contingencies, such as presented in the following article:
Charles Darwin sketched his first evolutionary tree in 1837, and trees have remained a central metaphor in evolutionary biology up to the present. Today, phylogenetics—the science of constructing and evaluating hypotheses about historical patterns of descent in the form of evolutionary trees—has...
evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com
Keep in mind too that where Gould is concerned, he (along with Niles Eldridge) promoted the idea of Punctuated Equilibrium, and he also pushed the idea of Non-Overlapping Magisteria, and those ideas, among others, have to be taken into account when we evaluate the overall work and thought of Gould.
Here's the thing: If you feel that supporting the idea of a literal 6-Day Creation is the way to go,
then by almost all means, feel free to support it! But maybe cut other fellow Christians some slack with all of your hoity-toitty agenda about how you're going to expose the alledged "Satanic Lie of Evolution" for what you think it is. Because, that's all it will be---simply what YOU think it is, not what it actually is:
an explanation that doesn't by any necessity destroy the Christian Faith.
Once you realize this, you can focus on the real issues (like those presented by C.S. Lewis in his book,
The Screwtape Letters). Then we --------that is, you and I--------can work on common Christian ground.
See how that works?
That's how it works!