You've made a HUGE leap of logic in saying that I want people to STOP imitating Christ. In fact, Christ was called THE SON of God, and I am calling people to realize that they are not simply servants. They are sons.
Sons have a relationship. Servants do not.
As a son, I took out the garbage. I mowed the lawn. I cleaned my room. I washed the dishes. But I also sat in my daddy's lap.Galatians 4:7
Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.
All I'm saying to you is being a servant like Christ, is a mindset of humility, beyond what most people comprehend. Being a son of God does not negate this mindset of servatude.Because sons obey out of love, not out of obligation.
Sons are not servants. Heck, Galatians 4:7 flat out tells us we are no more a servant, but a son.
You seem to think that because I say you should be a son that means that you shouldn't serve, and that's not at all true. What I am saying is that a servant does not have all the rights of a son.
I do not think of my son as a servant. I think of him as my son. That doesn't mean he doesn't have to help out and "serve", if you will, but he is by no means a servant. He is my son.
We are God's sons.
In any event, this is really not really all that relevant to this topic, so maybe I'll start another thread.
He calls God His father, which would make Him either a son or a daughter.But was He not even called the SON of God?
Search son,sons,and sonship in your concordance..
You will find it is not really scary after all..
That wasn't my point. My point was not nor has it ever been that you think we are spoiled little rich kids. My point was and always has been that in order to live a life that imitates Christ, we need to stop being only children whose daddy is rich and powerful and become like Christ, humble, a servant.Nowhere did I say we are "spoiled little rich kids who get everything [we] want just by throwing a fit". I said we are SONS. The definition of a son is not a "spoiled little rich kid".
Nowhere did I say we are "spoiled little rich kids who get everything [we] want just by throwing a fit". I said we are SONS. The definition of a son is not a "spoiled little rich kid".
I don't have a "faith group" thoughI would say you looked at the "totality" of scripture as interpreted by your faith group and made your decision.
I did the same and interpreted scripture much the same as you did, until I left the denomination I was a member of. This allowed me the rare privilege of being more objective in the way I interpret Gods dealing with men and, so, I reject a lot of what I had been taught (or mis-taught).
God wills all to be saved. Thats clear and unambiguous in scripturefor example the whosever passages and 2 Peter 3.9, The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. There is no such definitive statement about healing be Gods will for all. The only way we can say it is by threading often misinterpreted scriptures, 1+1=3 fashion and come up with the belief.
I also do not think you can equate temporary physical healing with eternal salvation, as when you insist on putting healing in the Atonement. IMO, that cheapens salvation and the atonement of Christ for sin. Sickness is simply a part of the human condition and God has always provided healing for humans in the OT as well as the NT (Naaman and Hezekiah, for example). Christ did not have to atone for something God was already providing. Christ died to atone for our sin. Our sickness was already being provided for; redemption for sin wasnt.
But God is not a horror stricken by sickness as we are and often uses it to teach us. Of course, some deny that (and would make Pauls thron in the flesh something other than what Paul called it, an infirmity) and we could argue that into the ground (again).
Anyhow, those are my thoughts.
~Jim
I would rather defend to the death your right to say stupid stuff than to have to listen to it.
I don't have a "faith group" though
But thanks for the reply back
In my opinion it has nothing to do with acting but allowing the Holy Spirit to lead you. As many people are led by the Spirit they are the sons of God. I'm sorry I don't have my Bible with me today.How much closer would God come to His desire, if we stopped going around acting like God and started acting like His servants?
I've been in this forum for almost 6 years and you don't know me yet?No worries. That just means we can each put you in whatever one we feel you should be in, based on how well we know you and your beliefs.
Gotta love it.
I've been in this forum for almost 6 years and you don't know me yet?
I'll help you out, I'm more WOF than anything else. Now you can commence to boxing me in...
So my words weren't so hard to understand as some here would have made them out to be.In my opinion it has nothing to do with acting but allowing the Holy Spirit to lead you. As many people are led by the Spirit they are the sons of God. I'm sorry I don't have my Bible with me today.
If I get the jist of your post correctly, if we born again christians started acting out in faith and become the servants He wants us to become then I believe that will make a difference. God has preordained works for us to do beforehand (Eph. 2) and He will lead us into those works if and when we allow it. I believe we have the power to allow this to happen. It's just a matter of letting go of the old self and letting the Spirit lead you. Simple concept but not always easy to do.
I'm sorry but I am not a Calvinist and I really didn't intend to get into any calvinistic debates.What is taught in the Bible, is that we are chosen for salvation and nowhere in the Scripture does it say that God chooses people to be damned. The Bible teaches election and predestination however, man's doctrines interepreted them differently. In the Old Testament, God calls Israel "mine elect" and chose Israel. In the New Testament, God calls Church "mine elect" and chose those whoever responded to the conviction of the Holy Spirit.
However, God can choose whatever He desires for us of us as we SERVE Him. The primary work of Christ in redemption is to justify and sanctify believers. God will use ordinary good people as well as ordinary very sinful people to accomplish great things. Through out the history (in the past 2, 000 years), God uses people of limitless backgrounds who can minister “together” (unity) for Christ. God works all things together for His purposes. God allowed Stephen to be stoned ( Acts 7:59-60 ) and James to be beheaded. God has given us the grace to sanctify us. The sources of "thorns" can be weaknesses, insults, distresses, persecutions and difficulties (which also includes sickness). James says count it all joy when you fall into various trials cause trials have a perfecting work. Peter says after you've suffered a while the Lord will make you perfect. God uses suffering to reveal our spiritual condition. In the midst of the sufferings, what kind of Christian do you see yourself?
So my words weren't so hard to understand as some here would have made them out to be.
Let me say this, I began a study on predestination, I haven't finished it yet, so I can't say too much, but so far it appears that the word used, in conjunction with the passage, means more like, I have arranged, or I have chosen you all to not die. In other words, God is not willing that any should perish. Now it also seems clear that there are individuals who have been hand picked for a specific task, John the Baptist comes to mind. But as to salvation, preliminary study points to an all inclusive idea. I'm anxious to finish the study and see if it all plays out the way the initial study appears to be going.I'm sorry but I am not a Calvinist and I really didn't intend to get into any calvinistic debates.
Here is what I believe Jim. I believe Jesus didn't die for just a select few but He died for all. Those who will accept Him as Lord will recieve salvation. Those who reject Him will not recieve salvation. When it comes right down to it, if He elects, wills, desires only a certain group to recieve salvation, by default, He then wills the rest to condemnation.
Whatever, the point is (John 3:16-17) Jesus came and died because of His love for all of mankind. He doesn't wish for anyone to be condemned but unless you accept His gift of salvation you will be condemned. God loved the whole world so much that He gave His only Son, that's saying alot about God's feelings towards all people, not just a select few. To me that is saying that God doesn't wish/desire/will/ that anyone should perrish, yet we all know that that is what happens to many. So regardless of what God desires and or wills for mankind, we know He isn't going to recieve what He desires
Personally, I wish people would stop acting like servants and realize they are sons.
I'm sorry but I am not a Calvinist and I really didn't intend to get into any calvinistic debates.
Here is what I believe Jim. I believe Jesus didn't die for just a select few but He died for all. Those who will accept Him as Lord will recieve salvation. Those who reject Him will not recieve salvation. When it comes right down to it, if He elects, wills, desires only a certain group to recieve salvation, by default, He then wills the rest to condemnation.
Whatever, the point is (John 3:16-17) Jesus came and died because of His love for all of mankind. He doesn't wish for anyone to be condemned but unless you accept His gift of salvation you will be condemned. God loved the whole world so much that He gave His only Son, that's saying alot about God's feelings towards all people, not just a select few. To me that is saying that God doesn't wish/desire/will/ that anyone should perrish, yet we all know that that is what happens to many. So regardless of what God desires and or wills for mankind, we know He isn't going to recieve what He desires