Really? We shouldn't treat childhood illnesses unless they're life or death? That's really the number 1 reason?
Upvote
0
SC Senate Passes Bill Banning Affirmative Care For Minors
- Thread starter rjs330
- Start date
Really? We shouldn't treat childhood illnesses unless they're life or death? That's really the number 1 reason?
The OP chose the article.
Seems like complaining that the facts from the OP's chosen article undermine the arguments made later in support of what the OP is trying to sell is blaming the messenger.
Upvote
0
I see. You have missed the calls to do away with the FDA and other government oversight agencies? Well, par for the course I guess.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
- Feb 10, 2013
- 15,528
- 9,069
- 28
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Celibate
- Politics
- US-Republican
It’s not made up. It’s essentially cosmetic surgery and genital mutation.
Upvote
0
- Feb 10, 2013
- 15,528
- 9,069
- 28
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Celibate
- Politics
- US-Republican
Cancer treatments are LIFESAVING and MEDICAL CARE.
“Gender affirming care” for minors who may change their mind over and over is not the same.
Upvote
0
Tge only similarity is that it's a treatment. You still ignored that the doctor doesn't give you any medication until it's proven you have a disease that will kill you. They don't just affirm you do and give it to you. I don't know what keytruda us but if it's a cancer drug they still won't give it to you just because you say you have the condition.
Your comparison continues to be a failure.
Upvote
0
- Feb 10, 2013
- 15,528
- 9,069
- 28
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Celibate
- Politics
- US-Republican
Furthermore permanent surgeries such as “gender affirming care” don’t need to be used on children. Wait until they’re ADULTS.
Upvote
0
Belk-Think that a complete ban on medicine that many specialists consider life saving is appropriate because you personally don't approve of it? Well, par for the course I guess.
It's never been proven to be life saving.thats a complete fabrication. It's seems my opinion is more in line with therapeutic practices around the world than yours is and has is in line with the systematic reviews than yours is.
It's never been proven to be life saving.thats a complete fabrication. It's seems my opinion is more in line with therapeutic practices around the world than yours is and has is in line with the systematic reviews than yours is.
Upvote
0
Doctors Agree: Gender-Affirming Care is Life-Saving Care | ACLU
Arkansas has become the first state to pass a bill banning health care for transgender youth and 16 other states have introduced similar legislation.
www.aclu.org
Gender-affirming Care Saves Lives
Growing legislative attempts to limit, ban, or criminalize access to this critical model of medical care endangers the health and well-being of transgender and nonbinary youth.
www.columbiapsychiatry.org
Get the Facts on Gender-Affirming Care
As attacks on the LGBTQ+ community continue to gain steam, it is important to get the facts about gender-affirming care.
Gender-affirming care for trans youths: What does science say?
Research demonstrates that having access to many forms of gender-affirming care is crucial for the mental health and well-being of trans and nonbinary youth.
www.medicalnewstoday.com
What the Science on Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Kids Really Shows
Laws that ban gender-affirming treatment ignore the wealth of research demonstrating its benefits for trans people’s health
Gender-affirming Care ‘Can Save Lives’ of Transgender Youth | UMass Amherst
New research co-authored by UMass economist Duc Hien Nguyen shows hormone therapy is associated with a 14.4% decrease in suicide risk if treatment is started between the ages of 14 and 17.
www.umass.edu
The benefits of gender-affirming care
Together, we can make health care inclusive for trans youth
I guess you should let all those stupid doctors, lawyers, and researchers know.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
It's all a complete.fabrication. Systematic reviews have proven the research on the subject is extremely poor and unreliable. All you posted were activist articles making unreliable claims based upon the same garbage research they've always used. There is NO evidence that transitioning for kids reduces their risk of suicidal ideation or suicide. None.Doctors Agree: Gender-Affirming Care is Life-Saving Care | ACLU
Arkansas has become the first state to pass a bill banning health care for transgender youth and 16 other states have introduced similar legislation.www.aclu.orgGender-affirming Care Saves Lives
Growing legislative attempts to limit, ban, or criminalize access to this critical model of medical care endangers the health and well-being of transgender and nonbinary youth.Get the Facts on Gender-Affirming Care
As attacks on the LGBTQ+ community continue to gain steam, it is important to get the facts about gender-affirming care.www.hrc.org
Gender-affirming care for trans youths: What does science say?
Research demonstrates that having access to many forms of gender-affirming care is crucial for the mental health and well-being of trans and nonbinary youth.What the Science on Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender Kids Really Shows
Laws that ban gender-affirming treatment ignore the wealth of research demonstrating its benefits for trans people’s healthwww.scientificamerican.com
Gender-affirming Care ‘Can Save Lives’ of Transgender Youth | UMass Amherst
New research co-authored by UMass economist Duc Hien Nguyen shows hormone therapy is associated with a 14.4% decrease in suicide risk if treatment is started between the ages of 14 and 17.The benefits of gender-affirming care
Together, we can make health care inclusive for trans youthsph.washington.edu
I guess you should let all those stupid doctors, lawyers, and researchers know.
I don't need to let any of them know. The systematic reviews have already determined that it's junk science. I refer you once again to the systematic reviews of the research.
Every single country has looked at the research and found it unreliable and inconclusive.
So you posting trans activism stuff isn't real evidence that it's effective. The claims they make that it helps is a complete.fabrication and unsupported by the evidence.
The Cass Report issued scathing condemnation for WPATH and stated that there are no long term.studies that show there is any improvement in mental health for kids who are medicalized. It stated that there is a strong possibility that any improvement seen in the short term is a placebo effect.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
You'll have to search for them for each country. Finland, Sweden, Norway, France and England.
Here's an article regarding them. But you'll have to do more research. I read a lot of stuff and I'm not going to do all the research again.
Europe And U.S. Diverge Sharply On Treatment Of Gender Incongruence In Minors
https://thehill.com/opinion/healthc...ite-directions-on-youth-transgender-medicine/
That's all I'm going to do. Bottom line is the other countries have put the brakes on including the Dutch. Many of these things are written in foreign languages that have to be interpreted. It's not an easy process.
The one difference is many of them haven't banned anything outright like the US. The difference being that they have very tight controls over the whole country, which the US doesn't have. They have research clinics where some kids can get into a tightly controlled research program that still isn't under the Affirmative Care model. The US in these states HAVE to ban the model because the medical field isn't doing anything. There is no other choice. Now if the medical field shut it down and did what the Europeans have done which is open up strictly controlled research groups where the kid has to apply to be part of the research then I don't think banning it outright would be necessary. But unfortunately that's not what is happening. Europe and rhe US has gone the opposite direction and kids are paying the price.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
No one said it was the same, just that a lot of excuses for government interference in personal medical decisions would apply equally to cancer treatments.
Weird how these posts need bring up stuff no one wrote to try and avoid talking about the things that were actually written.
Upvote
0
If you're just going to ignore the rest of my post I'll just restate the facts from it :
They're both treatments used on children which might not have a two decade long proven track record, are not 100% certain to work, and might potentially have side effects. So the comparison seems apt, given that those were excuses previously brought up to ban one of the two.
Plus the similarity you brought up that people are encouraged to ask their doctor about both of them.
Upvote
0
Uh huh.
And all those biologists are fooled by evolution.
All the climate researchers are fooled by APGW.
I guess we will just add this to the list of well evidenced research that will be overturned any minute now.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Similar threads
