- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,712
- 51,632
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
I've been told the same thing.I don't think.
Upvote
0
I've been told the same thing.I don't think.
youtu.be/F-d4zfovcog?t=141
Why Is There No Record of Ancient Humans?
similar to us (modern humans) in terms of their physical features, it does not mean they had broadly similar intelligence to us
Of course it's not " just because" but there is no reason toCarlson is wrong here. There is a significant record of ancient humans - just not a written record. We have 10,000s of artifacts from anatomically modern humans: stone tools, burial sites, cave paintings with associated tools, fire pits, rubbish sites, shell beads and others that all date back 100,000+ years.
What Carlson (and others of similar ilk) don't understand is that behavioural modernity is much younger than anatomical modernity. Just because a homo sapiens from 200,000 to 300,000 years ago looked broadly similar to us (modern humans) in terms of their physical features, it does not mean they had broadly similar intelligence to us.
Societal advancement to the point where sedentary civilisations could develop required a series of major technological breakthroughs. The domestication of plants and animals, invention of irrigation, development of smooth tools and pottery, and permanent housing. These in turn led to a major population breakthroughs (the Neolithic Demographic Transitions), but these took several thousand years to occur.
As someone with education in history and a little bit of palentology, it's so frustrating to see things mis-represented to conform to some wishful thinking.
Thanks.There is significant evidence of such. The size of the human brain is roughly the same as it was 300,000 years ago, but the shape and structure are different. The genetic evidence points to changes in the neocortex starting close to 100,000 years ago and continuing to around 12,000 years ago.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aao5961
Quantitative uniqueness of human brain evolution revealed through phylogenetic comparative analysis | eLife
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0500692102
How old do you think the pyramids are?
You believe in evolution, I believe in decline
I repeat my questions though:
How old do you think the pyramids are?
How old do you think human behavioural modernity is?
The latter is known, the former is not
But consider this…
youtube.com/watch?v=6lcjAg9HatM
Graham Hancock
How old do YOU think the pyramids are ?
Said changes continuing during " ice age",There is significant evidence of such. The size of the human brain is roughly the same as it was 300,000 years ago, but the shape and structure are different. The genetic evidence points to changes in the neocortex starting close to 100,000 years ago and continuing to around 12,000 years ago.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aao5961
Quantitative uniqueness of human brain evolution revealed through phylogenetic comparative analysis | eLife
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0500692102
News flash! Dinosaur spotted!