Actually ... we just received a copy of 2 news releases titled as follows ...
Study: Harm Outweighs Benefits of Spanking Washington Post 6/26/02
Study: Spare the rod, improve the child USA TODAY 7/8/02
This was included in our monthly newsletter for foster parents.
We did spank our child before our training to be foster parents (not very often though - it wasn't really needed) ... after our training we signed an agreement that we would not use corporal punishment on any foster child placed in our home (which we were in total agreement with after becoming more aware of disciplines that teach real life consequences).
Spanking is not the most effective form of discipline.
Train up a child - discipline - and he will not depart from it.
My children learn more from consequences than they do a spanking. It's very easy for a spanking to get out of control .....
Quotes from the articles ...
"Lots of people are worried that if parents never spanked, the result would be kids running wild ... Actually, what the research shows is just the opposite." Murray Straus, Univ. of New Hampshire
"Although spanking works, it does not work better than other methods of correcting and teaching kids."
"Spanking has harmful side effects. It increases "the chance that a child will become rebellious or depressed." These side effects may take years to show up ..."
"Toddlers and young children who are not spanked tend to have faster mental development, do better in school and have a better chance of graduating from college ... they also hit other children less and grow up to be parents who tend not to spank."
"The practice also does not teach a child right from wrong."
Discipline that uses real life consequences teaches ...
and that's not just "my" humble opinion