Obviously you didn't read the link, it's quite easily far more of an adequate explanation than that a Biology lecturer would get tongue tied on a basic upon basic question.
I'd disagree about Christ and the Apostles confirming the writings of Moses as anything other than Scripture.
I also find it interesting that you are saying I disagree with Moses, most people in your position say I disagree with God, I'd much rather be disagreeing with a 19th Century reading of a 7th Century BC text than disagreeing with God, that's what I believe I am doing and so would actually say I agree with the human autho- as far as I understand-him far more, after all this is what we want to achieve when reading any other piece of literature, yes the word of God is a piece of literature, it is far more than that but at probably its most basic level it is a piece of literature.
I've read many like it through the years. They are all wrong.
That's correct. If you differ with what God inspired Moses to write as historical then your position is in error. It is a very serious error and there is no excuse for it because the authors of scripture discussed Genesis as historical and literal. They never differentiated characters (Adam, Eve, Seth, Cain, Abel, Enoch, Noah, nor Abraham as compared with David, Solomon, Elijah, Isaiah, Daniel, etc.) as though the early chapters of Genesis were allegorial, symbolical,, etc. and the later O.T. characters as literal and historical. This is why your error & those of like mind with you in that error is so dreadful.
But a sampling of the literal and historical nature of the characters, events, and occurrences in Genesis is very evident in:
“For
Adam was first formed, then
Eve” (
I Tim. 2:13-15). This verse is a direct endorsement of the Creation account!
• “Nevertheless
death reigned from Adam to Moses.” (
Rom. 5:14).
• “the
first man Adam was made a living soul; the
last Adam [Christ] was made a quickening spirit” (
I Cor. 15:45). Christ, as the second Adam, is a type of the first.
• “For as
in Adam all die, even so
in Christ shall all be made alive” (
I Cor. 15:22).
• “
And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam.” (
Jude 1:14-15). Genealogies in the Old Testament are very extensive. When summarized in the New Testament, this validates the detailed renditions in the Old Testament.
Not only so but not only do the scripture shoot down any honest consideration of Darwinian philosophy but the scientific evidences available to all of us favors creationism and the Noahic flood and not evolution. It isn't even close.
