• With the events that occured on July 13th, 2024, a reminder that posts wishing that the attempt was successful will not be tolerated. Regardless of political affiliation, at no point is any type of post wishing death on someone is allowed and will be actioned appropriately by CF Staff.

  • Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,066
2,023
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟176,908.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
As I proved, Mr. Anonymous, Satan in imprisoned in the abyss in the next age, unable to prowl the earth, as he does now. And if you think I’m going to let your side-step Matt 13:38; Cor 5:5, 7:5; 2 Cor 11:14; 1 Thess 2:18; 1 Pet 5:8; and Rev 12:12-13 you’re sadly mistaken. The passages all affirm Christ rewards the saint with rule, power, and authority at his return, which proves we do not enter the eternal state then, insomuch as 1 Corinthians 15 affirms Christ ends all rule, power, and authority when the eternal state commences.

As to the silliness about the thrones, Revelation 5:10, along with those passages that cause such petulance, affirms the reign of the saints is on earth, not in heaven, which again vindicates Christ does not return to end all rule, power, and authority. And of course, Christ did not ascend to “his” throne but to his “Father’s throne” (Revelation 3:21). Christ returns to sit on “his” throne,

Matthew 25
31 "But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. NASB

And all this Premillennialist evidence complements Zechariah 14. Christ returns with “his holy ones” to be “be king over all the earth,” and enforce his rule over those “who are left of all the nations that went against Jerusalem” to “go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to celebrate the Feast of Booths,” just as foreshadowed by the Hebraic cultic calendar. Zechariah 14 NASB. Again, we have Christ establishing all rule, power and authority in the age to come.

Now if you have any true ability to interpret, then exegete on Zechariah 14 for us, without completely annihilating the grammatical-historical hermeneutic, if you can!
Hi Jerry,
back to the emphatic and bombastic tone again?
Silliness and petulance - nice tone! :oldthumbsup:
Keeping it civil hey? :doh:



THE TEXT SAYS SATAN IS BOUND "to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore"
Satan is limited in regards to deceiving the nations as the gospel goes forth. You know - this little detail that Jesus does rule the church now, from heaven now, over this earth with all authority NOW. Why do we have the Great Commission to share the gospel? Because Jesus HAS all authority. What does this do? Remember when the disciples went out declaring the good news, Jesus said he saw Satan 'fall like lightening'? It's the same thing. As we declare the gospel more and more - we bind Satan. That is the point of the start of Revelation 20.

THRONES ALL IN HEAVEN
Revelation 5:10 is obviously in heaven. It speaks about the FUTURE when the new people of God WILL reign on the earth - which we DO NOT see in Revelation 20 for a few reasons:-
Every other instance of 'thrones' in Revelation IS in heaven - especially Revelation 5:10! (One of the more obvious examples where John is setting up the symbolism for us.)
But back in Rev 20, John is discussing the martyrs who died coming alive before the thrones. John explains they are not in danger of hell. But he does so in a weird way - talking about the 'second death'. Why talk about it like that? Because the first death still has them. They are not physically alive yet - they're before the thrones. No where does Revelation 20 show Jesus touching down on the earth with these martyrs BEFORE the Millennium to 'reign during' the Millennium. Instead, Judgement Day and the resurrection of the dead all happens AFTER the "Millennium" WHEN JESUS RETURNS THE FIRST TIME as the rest of the NT confirms!
Therefore, the Millennium is most definitely the period between Jesus Resurrection and Return - as in right now - and the action in Revelation 20 is describing the martyrs safety in heaven. As us Amil's have been proving all along! So Revelation 5:10 does not support your reading, and your argument is demolished. (This over emphatic writing style is fun - I can see why you do it. :oldthumbsup: But maybe we should try and set a better example?)


PARALELLISM AS PER OTHER APOCALYPTIC WRITING
Scenes from heaven are then placed alongside scenes from earth in apocalyptic literature.
So what symbols act like grounding references as to where we are?
Jesus, THE throne, and Elders on thrones and white garments and martyrs? Heaven.
Bad stuff? Earth.
It's not hard.

CIRCULAR ARGUMENT WITH NO ACTUAL BEGINNING
Basically - you assert Revelation 20 is literal without proving it - and then break the rest of the New Testament in an attempt to look for a literal Millennium, and then circle around to say "Therefore Revelation 20 is literal! Hooray, I'm right - your arguments are all destroyed!"
But it was only your Premillennialist assumptions that kicked off this false circular argument.

Finally, the OT sets up the foundations, but the NT interprets the old.

That, my friend, is the sound of your argument being demolished. :oldthumbsup:
(Shall we drop this unfortunate tone next time?)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,101
140
Tucson
Visit site
✟280,695.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Jerry,
back to the emphatic and bombastic tone again?
Silliness and petulance - nice tone! :oldthumbsup:
Keeping it civil hey? :doh:



THE TEXT SAYS SATAN IS BOUND "to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore"
Satan is limited in regards to deceiving the nations as the gospel goes forth. You know - this little detail that Jesus does rule the church now, from heaven now, over this earth with all authority NOW. Why do we have the Great Commission to share the gospel? Because Jesus HAS all authority. What does this do? Remember when the disciples went out declaring the good news, Jesus said he saw Satan 'fall like lightening'? It's the same thing. As we declare the gospel more and more - we bind Satan. That is the point of the start of Revelation 20.

THRONES ALL IN HEAVEN
Revelation 5:10 is obviously in heaven. It speaks about the FUTURE when the new people of God WILL reign on the earth - which we DO NOT see in Revelation 20 for a few reasons:-
Every other instance of 'thrones' in Revelation IS in heaven - especially Revelation 5:10! (One of the more obvious examples where John is setting up the symbolism for us.)
But back in Rev 20, John is discussing the martyrs who died coming alive before the thrones. John explains they are not in danger of hell. But he does so in a weird way - talking about the 'second death'. Why talk about it like that? Because the first death still has them. They are not physically alive yet - they're before the thrones. No where does Revelation 20 show Jesus touching down on the earth with these martyrs BEFORE the Millennium to 'reign during' the Millennium. Instead, Judgement Day and the resurrection of the dead all happens AFTER the "Millennium" WHEN JESUS RETURNS THE FIRST TIME as the rest of the NT confirms!
Therefore, the Millennium is most definitely the period between Jesus Resurrection and Return - as in right now - and the action in Revelation 20 is describing the martyrs safety in heaven. As us Amil's have been proving all along! So Revelation 5:10 does not support your reading, and your argument is demolished. (This over emphatic writing style is fun - I can see why you do it. :oldthumbsup: But maybe we should try and set a better example?)


PARALELLISM AS PER OTHER APOCALYPTIC WRITING
Scenes from heaven are then placed alongside scenes from earth in apocalyptic literature.
So what symbols act like grounding references as to where we are?
Jesus, THE throne, and Elders on thrones and white garments and martyrs? Heaven.
Bad stuff? Earth.
It's not hard.

CIRCULAR ARGUMENT WITH NO ACTUAL BEGINNING
Basically - you assert Revelation 20 is literal without proving it - and then break the rest of the New Testament in an attempt to look for a literal Millennium, and then circle around to say "Therefore Revelation 20 is literal! Hooray, I'm right - your arguments are all destroyed!"
But it was only your Premillennialist assumptions that kicked off this false circular argument.

Finally, the OT sets up the foundations, but the NT interprets the old.

That, my friend, is the sound of your argument being demolished. :oldthumbsup:
(Shall we drop this unfortunate tone next time?)
Once again, Mr. Anonymous, I’m going to address the post I got in the email, not the one you changed drastically.

Revelation 20 doesn’t say Satan is “limited” in deceiving the nations, it says he’s “stopped,” insomuch as he confined to a prison and chained. The is but one proof Revelation 20 represents the age to come.

Revelation 5:10 also confirms my position, supported by Zechariah 14. The saints rule on earth in the age to come, in accord with Matt 13:38; Cor 5:5, 7:5; 2 Cor 11:14; 1 Thess 2:18; 1 Pet 5:8; Rev 12:12-13. And again, this is corroborated with 1 Corinthians 15 that the eternal state commences when Christ ends all rule, power and authority.

I’ve shown Revelation 20 is the age to come, disproving your weird notions that Christ is seated on his throne now issuing justice and security to the saint in accord with Jeremiah 23:3-6, while we live in a world in which Satan plants his tares in the Church to destroy and deceive.

Again, exegete on Zechariah 14 for us, without completely annihilating the grammatical-historical hermeneutic, if you can! Apparently, you’re afraid to enter into that debate because it substantiates Premillennialism.

As to the tenor of our debate, you might not have come here and overtly state that one day I’m “going to wake up and realize” you’re right, if you had wanted an affable debate. You can think that all you want but keep it to yourself if you want to take the high road.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,710
2,193
indiana
✟320,472.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Exegete Zechariah 14 for us, without butchering the grammatical-historical hermeneutic and then we’ll talk about whether postmill is correct on the kingdom of God in Matthew 13.

Your response is a “red herring” and an “argument from intimidation”

I asked for clarity on the OP as some of the issues you raised were a little confusing to me - 1.) why do you appear to define supersessionism only as replacement theology when there are other beliefs on supersessionism 2.) preterism doesn’t believe that God changed his mind or modified the soon coming kingdom, so why are you appearing to claim they do? 3.) which group of people in revelation are you talking about, as there are multiple different groups throughout different periods of time?

Your response doesn’t address these issues, but instead redirects to Zechariah 14 (red herring). Then Your response adds “without butchering the grammatical-historical hermeneutic”, thereby implying that any interpretation differing from his own would be invalid (argument from intimidation) This is not an argument but an attempt to preemptively discredit me.

I’ll ask again: so that I can address the OP with as best understanding as possible, can you clarify the 3 questions I asked?

Edit: i absolutely will address Zechariah 14, but I would appreciate feedback on the 3 questions first, so i can better understand your argument in the OP
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,895
2,674
MI
✟385,611.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't see that all your effort surmounted that Christ returns to reward his faithful with rule, power and authority (Matthew 19:28, 24:46-47; Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; John 14:2-3; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21). First Corinthian 15 says,

1 Corinthians 15​
25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.​
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.​

According to the NT Christ returns to rule the nations,

Revelation 2​
26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:​
27 And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.​

Consequently, since the eternal state is not entered until Christ ends "all rule and all authority and power," according to verse 24 in the passage, then we don't enter the eternal state when Christ returns. All the texts you cite must be interpreted from that truth, not amill dogma.
I see that you didn't even bother attempting to address anything I said in my post. I assume it's because you know you can't refute anything I said. Why did you not quote the other verses that talk about Him ruling with a rod of iron for context? Do you not care about context? Read Revelation 19:15 where Him ruling with a rod of iron is described alongside Him smiting His enemies and treading them in the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. That doesn't comes across as the kind of rule you are thinking of at all. It lines up with other scrpitures that teach He will destroy all of His enemies when He returns, not rule over them (Matt 24:35-39, Luke 17:26-30, 1 Thess 5:2-3, 2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:10-12).

Psalm 2:7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. 9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.

The original prophecy shows that Him "ruling" with a rod of iron is about Him breaking/destroying His enemies. In no way, shape or form does this text give any indication of Him ruling over them the way you falsely think He will. He will destroy them because His wrath is on them. He will take vengeance on all of them when He returns (2 Thess 1:7-10).
 
  • Like
Reactions: eclipsenow
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,895
2,674
MI
✟385,611.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Once again, Mr. Anonymous,
Calling Him Mr. Anonymous is so petty of you. You should be embarrassed for being so childish. Do you actually expect that he should use his real name on a forum like this the way you do? A vast majority do not. Do you have made up names for all the other posters on here who don't use their real names in their usernames as well, Mr. Jerry Huerta?
 
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,066
2,023
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟176,908.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Revelation 20 doesn’t say Satan is “limited” in deceiving the nations, it says he’s “stopped,” insomuch as he confined to a prison and chained. The is but one proof Revelation 20 represents the age to come.

Revelation 5:10 also confirms my position, supported by Zechariah 14. The saints rule on earth in the age to come, in accord with Matt 13:38; Cor 5:5, 7:5; 2 Cor 11:14; 1 Thess 2:18; 1 Pet 5:8; Rev 12:12-13. And again, this is corroborated with 1 Corinthians 15 that the eternal state commences when Christ ends all rule, power and authority.
Hi Jerry,
yes - I did rush my post and then had to do something and came back later and thought - "Oh dear - that's a little clunky - I had better tidy it up."

Revelation 5 is obviously happening around the throne of God in heaven - that is where the action is. I have started a Poll on it just for you to have a look at the results.


"MEANWHILE, IN GOTHAM CITY...."
I did not ask where the Elders on the thrones might have made a promise about the earth - I asked where Revelation actually SHOWS the thrones ON the Earth. Remember - this is apocalyptic symbolism. Parallelism is a common literary device running through Enoch and other apocalyptic writing of the period. Parallelism reminds me of how the old Batman show changes scene. "Meanwhile, in Gotham city!" and the screen twirls and the Batman trumpet jingle plays and we move to a scene with the Commissioner holding the Bat-phone behind that bland desk of his. The Commissioner and Bat-phone ground us. They are a clear signal. "Now we're in Gotham city!" Parallelism flips back and forth like that. It's how the genre works.

So what symbols act like grounding references as to where we are?

Heaven = JESUS, THE THRONE, the ELDERS on THRONES, Martyrs and White Garments.​

Earth = bad stuff.

It's not hard.


IN fact - and here is a controversial statement - I am prepared to state that I think John's actual visions and inspired truths did not actually look anything like the symbols he used in the book of Revelation. I think he was given a fresh sense of the eternal security of the martyrs, and of the gospel truths, and of the nature of the church and heaven. Apart from a very few cases, the bible does not write down dictation from God. Christianity is not Islam like that! The apostles were Spirit inspired to write the truth accurately - but they did so in the language and customs and genre of the time. John carefully crafted these images as much as Shakespeare!

So - as much as we might ask "What is God saying here to us today?" - we also need to ask "What images did JOHN use to craft this message and why?" It's not blasphemous to do so. It's hermeneutics. It's how the bible works.

John repeatedly and consistently shows that the THRONES THEMSELVES are in heaven in every single instance in Revelation!

This means the Millennium is actually reminding us that while the martyrs ARE dead - they come alive in heaven before the THRONES and with JESUS.

Problems for the Millennialist:-
IT CONTRADICTS REST OF NT:
Why do all the other verses in the NT equate Jesus returning with the raising of ALL the dead and Judgement Day and Heaven and Hell and a New Heavens and New Earth, not Jesus installing a half-heaven, half-earth, half mortal, half immortal kingdom?
Why does Revelation 20 show Jesus returning after the Millennium - not before?
Where does Revelation 20 ACTUALLY show Jesus returning to earth BEFORE the Millennium to reign DURING the Millennium on earth?

MORTALS AND IMMORTALS: Who are the 'nations' during the Millennium that are going to be deceived at the end of the Gazillion Years - when according to a literalist view, the dead martyrs have already been raised? Do we have mortals living alongside immortals? Doesn't Corinthians say that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom to come? Are you saying it can now?
Didn't Jesus say that in the age to come there would be no more marriage? In effect - no more babies? How will there be any "nations" to rebel at the end of Revelation 20 if there's no marriage and these non-Christians are all mortal? It's a Gazillion Years!

SATAN's BINDING:
The literal Millennialist insists that because we are currently in a spiritual battle with Satan - we cannot be in the Millennium. Because there’s no Satan in the Millennium, right? That’s a good question - but answering it will first involve the idea of Parallelism. We know from 24 other apocalyptic works of the time that the genre often uses a literary tool called Parallelism. In apocalyptic, this is often comparing the geopolitical darkness of the day on earth (dressed up in the theological language of monsters and symbols) with the action in heaven. But there is also what John is doing here in Revelation 20. There’s Parallelism that is roughly like an English or Art essay where we might be asked to “compare and contrast” 2 things. John uses this a LOT! EG: The great city of sin, Babylon, with the great city of light and life - the New Jerusalem. Those who took the Mark of the Beast in Rev 13, with those who did not in Rev 14. The righteous and how they fare, with the unrighteous and how they fare. Etc etc etc.

So in Revelation 13 we have Satan inspiring the Roman government persecution against God’s people. It's written in this symbolic language that shows while John is talking about the Romans - he is also warning that this applies to all Christians across all time - and that we should be ready for outbreaks of persecution like this in our own times. But it’s OK - because in Revelation 14 - the martyrs are safe!
It’s a similar scene in Revelation 20. We just saw Judgement Day at the end of Revelation 19. We are about to see it again in Revelation 20 - but from the Parallel point of view from heaven. What do we see here? We see Jesus, and the martyrs come to life before the thrones of the elders - and in Revelation they are always in heaven. John even speaks of the martyrs being safe from hell as being safe from the ‘second death’ - a weird way of talking about the pit - but they are safe from the ‘second death’ because the first death still has them! They are ‘alive’ in heaven!
Now, Satan has been bound in a very specific way! We’ve got to understand the imagery is not a geographic reality - Satan being bound in a literal pit - but a theological statement. Satan is bound with regard to 'deceiving the nations' as the gospel goes forward. That shows how ineffectual he is to prevent the growth of God's kingdom.
EG: There are now roughly a million Christians in IRAN - where there is intense persecution of Christians. As God's gospel charges into new lands, Satan's ability to 'deceive the nations' is in retreat.

DO WE SEE THIS USE OF SATAN BOUND ANYWHERE ELSE LIKE THIS?
The Greek word for "Bound" when Satan is "Bound" in Revelation 20 is ἔδησεν (edēsen). I’m no Greek scholar - but apparently this word ἔδησεν (edēsen) is the aorist active indicative, third person singular form of the verb δέω (deō).
δέω (deō) is the Greek root word and it means "to bind, tie, fasten; to imprison, to put in bonds."
This root word is the same word used in Matthew 12. The Pharisees have just accused Jesus of using Satanic powers to defeat demons. But Jesus answers that this is a matter of kingdoms at war - and that a kingdom divided against itself will fall. Then...
“Again, how can anyone enter a strong man’s house and carry off his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man? Then he can plunder his house.”
It’s the same root word deō. Jesus is here to bind Satan and carry off his plunder! How does he do this? The next few Chapters of Matthew explain the parable of the sower, the weeds in the kingdom, Judgement Day, etc. That is - Jesus is creating his kingdom through his gospel message. He is choosing people for his kingdom. That’s the plunder! Jesus is binding Satan as the gospel marches forward. (See also Mark 3:27) Also see Luke 13:11 where the woman ‘crippled’ (or bound) by Satan for years is healed by Jesus. He is unbinding her from Satan. He binds Satan’s kingdom as he frees Satan’s captives.
There is also the unusual passage of 2 Peter 2 where in a list of God’s past judgements against his enemies, it says... “For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them in chains of darkness[to be held for judgment;” etc That’s past tense. It already happened. There seems to have been some binding of demons - and 2 Peter specifically says they are there to wait for Judgement. But here’s the thing. Revelation 20 does not say that - it says Satan is bound specifically in regard to deceiving the nations.
Finally - we come to the march of the gospel as a means of binding Satan. “When the seventy returned from their preaching mission, they said to Jesus, "Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name." Jesus replied, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven" (Luke 10:17-18) A certain kind of binding of the strongman, of the restriction of Satan’s power and kingdom, occurs as we declare the gospel.
But Jesus goes EVEN FURTHER than this when he says: "Now is the judgment of this world, now shall the ruler of this world be cast out; and I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself." John 12:31-32:
The Greek for "Cast out" in Revelation 20:3 is ebalen, and the root word is ballo: "to throw, cast, hurl, fling, cast down, throw down, put, place, lay." This is the root word for ‘will be cast out’ or the longer term ekblēthēsetai that we see in John 12:31-32!
Then when Jesus rises - he is given all power and authority - and as a result gives us the Great Commission. His reign now gives us the authority now to declare the gospel now and bind Satan’s kingdom now. Combine this with our understanding of parallelism in Revelation - we can see that John is warning us that we are in a spiritual war with Satan, and this will sometimes influence governments to turn against us. But remember - as we declare the gospel and see people saved, we are binding the strongman, taking his plunder, making Satan ‘fall like lightning’, and claiming the victory through the cross because Satan’s authority over this world WAS cast out - past tense - once and for all - on the cross! All that awaits is the final Judgement Day which we see at the end of Revelation chapter 20, at the end of this millennium that we are currently in!
 
Upvote 0