• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

Status
Not open for further replies.

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,468
2,297
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟187,927.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
As I proved, Mr. Anonymous, Satan in imprisoned in the abyss in the next age, unable to prowl the earth, as he does now. And if you think I’m going to let your side-step Matt 13:38; Cor 5:5, 7:5; 2 Cor 11:14; 1 Thess 2:18; 1 Pet 5:8; and Rev 12:12-13 you’re sadly mistaken. The passages all affirm Christ rewards the saint with rule, power, and authority at his return, which proves we do not enter the eternal state then, insomuch as 1 Corinthians 15 affirms Christ ends all rule, power, and authority when the eternal state commences.

As to the silliness about the thrones, Revelation 5:10, along with those passages that cause such petulance, affirms the reign of the saints is on earth, not in heaven, which again vindicates Christ does not return to end all rule, power, and authority. And of course, Christ did not ascend to “his” throne but to his “Father’s throne” (Revelation 3:21). Christ returns to sit on “his” throne,

Matthew 25
31 "But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. NASB

And all this Premillennialist evidence complements Zechariah 14. Christ returns with “his holy ones” to be “be king over all the earth,” and enforce his rule over those “who are left of all the nations that went against Jerusalem” to “go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to celebrate the Feast of Booths,” just as foreshadowed by the Hebraic cultic calendar. Zechariah 14 NASB. Again, we have Christ establishing all rule, power and authority in the age to come.

Now if you have any true ability to interpret, then exegete on Zechariah 14 for us, without completely annihilating the grammatical-historical hermeneutic, if you can!
Hi Jerry,
back to the emphatic and bombastic tone again?
Silliness and petulance - nice tone! :oldthumbsup:
Keeping it civil hey? :doh:



THE TEXT SAYS SATAN IS BOUND "to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore"
Satan is limited in regards to deceiving the nations as the gospel goes forth. You know - this little detail that Jesus does rule the church now, from heaven now, over this earth with all authority NOW. Why do we have the Great Commission to share the gospel? Because Jesus HAS all authority. What does this do? Remember when the disciples went out declaring the good news, Jesus said he saw Satan 'fall like lightening'? It's the same thing. As we declare the gospel more and more - we bind Satan. That is the point of the start of Revelation 20.

THRONES ALL IN HEAVEN
Revelation 5:10 is obviously in heaven. It speaks about the FUTURE when the new people of God WILL reign on the earth - which we DO NOT see in Revelation 20 for a few reasons:-
Every other instance of 'thrones' in Revelation IS in heaven - especially Revelation 5:10! (One of the more obvious examples where John is setting up the symbolism for us.)
But back in Rev 20, John is discussing the martyrs who died coming alive before the thrones. John explains they are not in danger of hell. But he does so in a weird way - talking about the 'second death'. Why talk about it like that? Because the first death still has them. They are not physically alive yet - they're before the thrones. No where does Revelation 20 show Jesus touching down on the earth with these martyrs BEFORE the Millennium to 'reign during' the Millennium. Instead, Judgement Day and the resurrection of the dead all happens AFTER the "Millennium" WHEN JESUS RETURNS THE FIRST TIME as the rest of the NT confirms!
Therefore, the Millennium is most definitely the period between Jesus Resurrection and Return - as in right now - and the action in Revelation 20 is describing the martyrs safety in heaven. As us Amil's have been proving all along! So Revelation 5:10 does not support your reading, and your argument is demolished. (This over emphatic writing style is fun - I can see why you do it. :oldthumbsup: But maybe we should try and set a better example?)


PARALELLISM AS PER OTHER APOCALYPTIC WRITING
Scenes from heaven are then placed alongside scenes from earth in apocalyptic literature.
So what symbols act like grounding references as to where we are?
Jesus, THE throne, and Elders on thrones and white garments and martyrs? Heaven.
Bad stuff? Earth.
It's not hard.

CIRCULAR ARGUMENT WITH NO ACTUAL BEGINNING
Basically - you assert Revelation 20 is literal without proving it - and then break the rest of the New Testament in an attempt to look for a literal Millennium, and then circle around to say "Therefore Revelation 20 is literal! Hooray, I'm right - your arguments are all destroyed!"
But it was only your Premillennialist assumptions that kicked off this false circular argument.

Finally, the OT sets up the foundations, but the NT interprets the old.

That, my friend, is the sound of your argument being demolished. :oldthumbsup:
(Shall we drop this unfortunate tone next time?)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Jerry,
back to the emphatic and bombastic tone again?
Silliness and petulance - nice tone! :oldthumbsup:
Keeping it civil hey? :doh:



THE TEXT SAYS SATAN IS BOUND "to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore"
Satan is limited in regards to deceiving the nations as the gospel goes forth. You know - this little detail that Jesus does rule the church now, from heaven now, over this earth with all authority NOW. Why do we have the Great Commission to share the gospel? Because Jesus HAS all authority. What does this do? Remember when the disciples went out declaring the good news, Jesus said he saw Satan 'fall like lightening'? It's the same thing. As we declare the gospel more and more - we bind Satan. That is the point of the start of Revelation 20.

THRONES ALL IN HEAVEN
Revelation 5:10 is obviously in heaven. It speaks about the FUTURE when the new people of God WILL reign on the earth - which we DO NOT see in Revelation 20 for a few reasons:-
Every other instance of 'thrones' in Revelation IS in heaven - especially Revelation 5:10! (One of the more obvious examples where John is setting up the symbolism for us.)
But back in Rev 20, John is discussing the martyrs who died coming alive before the thrones. John explains they are not in danger of hell. But he does so in a weird way - talking about the 'second death'. Why talk about it like that? Because the first death still has them. They are not physically alive yet - they're before the thrones. No where does Revelation 20 show Jesus touching down on the earth with these martyrs BEFORE the Millennium to 'reign during' the Millennium. Instead, Judgement Day and the resurrection of the dead all happens AFTER the "Millennium" WHEN JESUS RETURNS THE FIRST TIME as the rest of the NT confirms!
Therefore, the Millennium is most definitely the period between Jesus Resurrection and Return - as in right now - and the action in Revelation 20 is describing the martyrs safety in heaven. As us Amil's have been proving all along! So Revelation 5:10 does not support your reading, and your argument is demolished. (This over emphatic writing style is fun - I can see why you do it. :oldthumbsup: But maybe we should try and set a better example?)


PARALELLISM AS PER OTHER APOCALYPTIC WRITING
Scenes from heaven are then placed alongside scenes from earth in apocalyptic literature.
So what symbols act like grounding references as to where we are?
Jesus, THE throne, and Elders on thrones and white garments and martyrs? Heaven.
Bad stuff? Earth.
It's not hard.

CIRCULAR ARGUMENT WITH NO ACTUAL BEGINNING
Basically - you assert Revelation 20 is literal without proving it - and then break the rest of the New Testament in an attempt to look for a literal Millennium, and then circle around to say "Therefore Revelation 20 is literal! Hooray, I'm right - your arguments are all destroyed!"
But it was only your Premillennialist assumptions that kicked off this false circular argument.

Finally, the OT sets up the foundations, but the NT interprets the old.

That, my friend, is the sound of your argument being demolished. :oldthumbsup:
(Shall we drop this unfortunate tone next time?)
Once again, Mr. Anonymous, I’m going to address the post I got in the email, not the one you changed drastically.

Revelation 20 doesn’t say Satan is “limited” in deceiving the nations, it says he’s “stopped,” insomuch as he confined to a prison and chained. The is but one proof Revelation 20 represents the age to come.

Revelation 5:10 also confirms my position, supported by Zechariah 14. The saints rule on earth in the age to come, in accord with Matt 13:38; Cor 5:5, 7:5; 2 Cor 11:14; 1 Thess 2:18; 1 Pet 5:8; Rev 12:12-13. And again, this is corroborated with 1 Corinthians 15 that the eternal state commences when Christ ends all rule, power and authority.

I’ve shown Revelation 20 is the age to come, disproving your weird notions that Christ is seated on his throne now issuing justice and security to the saint in accord with Jeremiah 23:3-6, while we live in a world in which Satan plants his tares in the Church to destroy and deceive.

Again, exegete on Zechariah 14 for us, without completely annihilating the grammatical-historical hermeneutic, if you can! Apparently, you’re afraid to enter into that debate because it substantiates Premillennialism.

As to the tenor of our debate, you might not have come here and overtly state that one day I’m “going to wake up and realize” you’re right, if you had wanted an affable debate. You can think that all you want but keep it to yourself if you want to take the high road.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,725
2,194
indiana
✟326,297.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Exegete Zechariah 14 for us, without butchering the grammatical-historical hermeneutic and then we’ll talk about whether postmill is correct on the kingdom of God in Matthew 13.

Your response is a “red herring” and an “argument from intimidation”

I asked for clarity on the OP as some of the issues you raised were a little confusing to me - 1.) why do you appear to define supersessionism only as replacement theology when there are other beliefs on supersessionism 2.) preterism doesn’t believe that God changed his mind or modified the soon coming kingdom, so why are you appearing to claim they do? 3.) which group of people in revelation are you talking about, as there are multiple different groups throughout different periods of time?

Your response doesn’t address these issues, but instead redirects to Zechariah 14 (red herring). Then Your response adds “without butchering the grammatical-historical hermeneutic”, thereby implying that any interpretation differing from his own would be invalid (argument from intimidation) This is not an argument but an attempt to preemptively discredit me.

I’ll ask again: so that I can address the OP with as best understanding as possible, can you clarify the 3 questions I asked?

Edit: i absolutely will address Zechariah 14, but I would appreciate feedback on the 3 questions first, so i can better understand your argument in the OP
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,046
2,705
MI
✟400,698.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't see that all your effort surmounted that Christ returns to reward his faithful with rule, power and authority (Matthew 19:28, 24:46-47; Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; John 14:2-3; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21). First Corinthian 15 says,

1 Corinthians 15​
25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.​
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.​

According to the NT Christ returns to rule the nations,

Revelation 2​
26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:​
27 And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.​

Consequently, since the eternal state is not entered until Christ ends "all rule and all authority and power," according to verse 24 in the passage, then we don't enter the eternal state when Christ returns. All the texts you cite must be interpreted from that truth, not amill dogma.
I see that you didn't even bother attempting to address anything I said in my post. I assume it's because you know you can't refute anything I said. Why did you not quote the other verses that talk about Him ruling with a rod of iron for context? Do you not care about context? Read Revelation 19:15 where Him ruling with a rod of iron is described alongside Him smiting His enemies and treading them in the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. That doesn't comes across as the kind of rule you are thinking of at all. It lines up with other scrpitures that teach He will destroy all of His enemies when He returns, not rule over them (Matt 24:35-39, Luke 17:26-30, 1 Thess 5:2-3, 2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:10-12).

Psalm 2:7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. 9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.

The original prophecy shows that Him "ruling" with a rod of iron is about Him breaking/destroying His enemies. In no way, shape or form does this text give any indication of Him ruling over them the way you falsely think He will. He will destroy them because His wrath is on them. He will take vengeance on all of them when He returns (2 Thess 1:7-10).
 
  • Like
Reactions: eclipsenow
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,046
2,705
MI
✟400,698.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Once again, Mr. Anonymous,
Calling Him Mr. Anonymous is so petty of you. You should be embarrassed for being so childish. Do you actually expect that he should use his real name on a forum like this the way you do? A vast majority do not. Do you have made up names for all the other posters on here who don't use their real names in their usernames as well, Mr. Jerry Huerta?
 
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,468
2,297
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟187,927.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Revelation 20 doesn’t say Satan is “limited” in deceiving the nations, it says he’s “stopped,” insomuch as he confined to a prison and chained. The is but one proof Revelation 20 represents the age to come.

Revelation 5:10 also confirms my position, supported by Zechariah 14. The saints rule on earth in the age to come, in accord with Matt 13:38; Cor 5:5, 7:5; 2 Cor 11:14; 1 Thess 2:18; 1 Pet 5:8; Rev 12:12-13. And again, this is corroborated with 1 Corinthians 15 that the eternal state commences when Christ ends all rule, power and authority.
Hi Jerry,
yes - I did rush my post and then had to do something and came back later and thought - "Oh dear - that's a little clunky - I had better tidy it up."

Revelation 5 is obviously happening around the throne of God in heaven - that is where the action is. I have started a Poll on it just for you to have a look at the results.


"MEANWHILE, IN GOTHAM CITY...."
I did not ask where the Elders on the thrones might have made a promise about the earth - I asked where Revelation actually SHOWS the thrones ON the Earth. Remember - this is apocalyptic symbolism. Parallelism is a common literary device running through Enoch and other apocalyptic writing of the period. Parallelism reminds me of how the old Batman show changes scene. "Meanwhile, in Gotham city!" and the screen twirls and the Batman trumpet jingle plays and we move to a scene with the Commissioner holding the Bat-phone behind that bland desk of his. The Commissioner and Bat-phone ground us. They are a clear signal. "Now we're in Gotham city!" Parallelism flips back and forth like that. It's how the genre works.

So what symbols act like grounding references as to where we are?

Heaven = JESUS, THE THRONE, the ELDERS on THRONES, Martyrs and White Garments.​

Earth = bad stuff.

It's not hard.


IN fact - and here is a controversial statement - I am prepared to state that I think John's actual visions and inspired truths did not actually look anything like the symbols he used in the book of Revelation. I think he was given a fresh sense of the eternal security of the martyrs, and of the gospel truths, and of the nature of the church and heaven. Apart from a very few cases, the bible does not write down dictation from God. Christianity is not Islam like that! The apostles were Spirit inspired to write the truth accurately - but they did so in the language and customs and genre of the time. John carefully crafted these images as much as Shakespeare!

So - as much as we might ask "What is God saying here to us today?" - we also need to ask "What images did JOHN use to craft this message and why?" It's not blasphemous to do so. It's hermeneutics. It's how the bible works.

John repeatedly and consistently shows that the THRONES THEMSELVES are in heaven in every single instance in Revelation!

This means the Millennium is actually reminding us that while the martyrs ARE dead - they come alive in heaven before the THRONES and with JESUS.

Problems for the Millennialist:-
IT CONTRADICTS REST OF NT:
Why do all the other verses in the NT equate Jesus returning with the raising of ALL the dead and Judgement Day and Heaven and Hell and a New Heavens and New Earth, not Jesus installing a half-heaven, half-earth, half mortal, half immortal kingdom?
Why does Revelation 20 show Jesus returning after the Millennium - not before?
Where does Revelation 20 ACTUALLY show Jesus returning to earth BEFORE the Millennium to reign DURING the Millennium on earth?

MORTALS AND IMMORTALS: Who are the 'nations' during the Millennium that are going to be deceived at the end of the Gazillion Years - when according to a literalist view, the dead martyrs have already been raised? Do we have mortals living alongside immortals? Doesn't Corinthians say that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom to come? Are you saying it can now?
Didn't Jesus say that in the age to come there would be no more marriage? In effect - no more babies? How will there be any "nations" to rebel at the end of Revelation 20 if there's no marriage and these non-Christians are all mortal? It's a Gazillion Years!

SATAN's BINDING:
The literal Millennialist insists that because we are currently in a spiritual battle with Satan - we cannot be in the Millennium. Because there’s no Satan in the Millennium, right? That’s a good question - but answering it will first involve the idea of Parallelism. We know from 24 other apocalyptic works of the time that the genre often uses a literary tool called Parallelism. In apocalyptic, this is often comparing the geopolitical darkness of the day on earth (dressed up in the theological language of monsters and symbols) with the action in heaven. But there is also what John is doing here in Revelation 20. There’s Parallelism that is roughly like an English or Art essay where we might be asked to “compare and contrast” 2 things. John uses this a LOT! EG: The great city of sin, Babylon, with the great city of light and life - the New Jerusalem. Those who took the Mark of the Beast in Rev 13, with those who did not in Rev 14. The righteous and how they fare, with the unrighteous and how they fare. Etc etc etc.

So in Revelation 13 we have Satan inspiring the Roman government persecution against God’s people. It's written in this symbolic language that shows while John is talking about the Romans - he is also warning that this applies to all Christians across all time - and that we should be ready for outbreaks of persecution like this in our own times. But it’s OK - because in Revelation 14 - the martyrs are safe!
It’s a similar scene in Revelation 20. We just saw Judgement Day at the end of Revelation 19. We are about to see it again in Revelation 20 - but from the Parallel point of view from heaven. What do we see here? We see Jesus, and the martyrs come to life before the thrones of the elders - and in Revelation they are always in heaven. John even speaks of the martyrs being safe from hell as being safe from the ‘second death’ - a weird way of talking about the pit - but they are safe from the ‘second death’ because the first death still has them! They are ‘alive’ in heaven!
Now, Satan has been bound in a very specific way! We’ve got to understand the imagery is not a geographic reality - Satan being bound in a literal pit - but a theological statement. Satan is bound with regard to 'deceiving the nations' as the gospel goes forward. That shows how ineffectual he is to prevent the growth of God's kingdom.
EG: There are now roughly a million Christians in IRAN - where there is intense persecution of Christians. As God's gospel charges into new lands, Satan's ability to 'deceive the nations' is in retreat.

DO WE SEE THIS USE OF SATAN BOUND ANYWHERE ELSE LIKE THIS?
The Greek word for "Bound" when Satan is "Bound" in Revelation 20 is ἔδησεν (edēsen). I’m no Greek scholar - but apparently this word ἔδησεν (edēsen) is the aorist active indicative, third person singular form of the verb δέω (deō).
δέω (deō) is the Greek root word and it means "to bind, tie, fasten; to imprison, to put in bonds."
This root word is the same word used in Matthew 12. The Pharisees have just accused Jesus of using Satanic powers to defeat demons. But Jesus answers that this is a matter of kingdoms at war - and that a kingdom divided against itself will fall. Then...
“Again, how can anyone enter a strong man’s house and carry off his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man? Then he can plunder his house.”
It’s the same root word deō. Jesus is here to bind Satan and carry off his plunder! How does he do this? The next few Chapters of Matthew explain the parable of the sower, the weeds in the kingdom, Judgement Day, etc. That is - Jesus is creating his kingdom through his gospel message. He is choosing people for his kingdom. That’s the plunder! Jesus is binding Satan as the gospel marches forward. (See also Mark 3:27) Also see Luke 13:11 where the woman ‘crippled’ (or bound) by Satan for years is healed by Jesus. He is unbinding her from Satan. He binds Satan’s kingdom as he frees Satan’s captives.
There is also the unusual passage of 2 Peter 2 where in a list of God’s past judgements against his enemies, it says... “For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them in chains of darkness[to be held for judgment;” etc That’s past tense. It already happened. There seems to have been some binding of demons - and 2 Peter specifically says they are there to wait for Judgement. But here’s the thing. Revelation 20 does not say that - it says Satan is bound specifically in regard to deceiving the nations.
Finally - we come to the march of the gospel as a means of binding Satan. “When the seventy returned from their preaching mission, they said to Jesus, "Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name." Jesus replied, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven" (Luke 10:17-18) A certain kind of binding of the strongman, of the restriction of Satan’s power and kingdom, occurs as we declare the gospel.
But Jesus goes EVEN FURTHER than this when he says: "Now is the judgment of this world, now shall the ruler of this world be cast out; and I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself." John 12:31-32:
The Greek for "Cast out" in Revelation 20:3 is ebalen, and the root word is ballo: "to throw, cast, hurl, fling, cast down, throw down, put, place, lay." This is the root word for ‘will be cast out’ or the longer term ekblēthēsetai that we see in John 12:31-32!
Then when Jesus rises - he is given all power and authority - and as a result gives us the Great Commission. His reign now gives us the authority now to declare the gospel now and bind Satan’s kingdom now. Combine this with our understanding of parallelism in Revelation - we can see that John is warning us that we are in a spiritual war with Satan, and this will sometimes influence governments to turn against us. But remember - as we declare the gospel and see people saved, we are binding the strongman, taking his plunder, making Satan ‘fall like lightning’, and claiming the victory through the cross because Satan’s authority over this world WAS cast out - past tense - once and for all - on the cross! All that awaits is the final Judgement Day which we see at the end of Revelation chapter 20, at the end of this millennium that we are currently in!
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Your response is a “red herring” and an “argument from intimidation”

I asked for clarity on the OP as some of the issues you raised were a little confusing to me - 1.) why do you appear to define supersessionism only as replacement theology when there are other beliefs on supersessionism 2.) preterism doesn’t believe that God changed his mind or modified the soon coming kingdom, so why are you appearing to claim they do? 3.) which group of people in revelation are you talking about, as there are multiple different groups throughout different periods of time?

Your response doesn’t address these issues, but instead redirects to Zechariah 14 (red herring). Then Your response adds “without butchering the grammatical-historical hermeneutic”, thereby implying that any interpretation differing from his own would be invalid (argument from intimidation) This is not an argument but an attempt to preemptively discredit me.

I’ll ask again: so that I can address the OP with as best understanding as possible, can you clarify the 3 questions I asked?

Edit: i absolutely will address Zechariah 14, but I would appreciate feedback on the 3 questions first, so i can better understand your argument in the OP

Zechariah 14 intimidates post and amills; don’t blame that on me. It’s relevant because it depicts the antitype of the Festival of Tabernacles, Succot, the name of the age to come when Christ reigns on earth before he puts “down all rule and all authority and power.” Christ isn’t reining now; we aren’t living in an ecclesiocracy (Rev 20:6).1 I’m quite aware of your eschatology, claninja.

I’ll summarize my OP but do exegete Zechariah 14 without annihilating the grammatical-historical hermeneutic if you can.

Christ didn’t come to establish “his” kingdom; the kingdom at hand was that of the Fathers. In the kingdom of God, the sheep are scattered; in Christ’s kingdom they are gathered,

Matthew 24
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

1 Thessalonians 4
16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

Jeremiah 23:
1 Woe be unto the pastors that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith the LORD.
2 Therefore thus saith the LORD God of Israel against the pastors that feed my people; Ye have scattered my flock, and driven them away, and have not visited them: behold, I will visit upon you the evil of your doings, saith the LORD.
3 And I will gather the remnant of my flock out of all countries whither I have driven them, and will bring them again to their folds; and they shall be fruitful and increase.
4 And I will set up shepherds over them which shall feed them: and they shall fear no more, nor be dismayed, neither shall they be lacking, saith the LORD.
5 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.
6 In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.

The OP cited several OT passages as the source of the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares, depicting the scattering of Israel, “the kingdom of God,” finding grace in the wilderness (Jeremiah 31:1-2; Ezekiel 34:25; Hosea 2:14-23). And of course, Matthew 19:28, 24:46-47; Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; John 14:2-3; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21 affirm that the saints rule on earth in power and authority with Christ in “his” kingdom at his return, before he puts “down all rule and all authority and power” and the eternal state commences, according to 1 Corinthians 15.

Preterists have become adroit in marketing their wares. However, by any other name, supersessionism is still the same and promotes God changed his mind to replace Israel. If He didn’t replace Israel, then the good seed gathered into the “barn” in the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares represents the remnant of Jacob with the Gentiles “attached” to them, in fulfillment of many passages in the OT,

Isaiah 14
1 When the LORD will have compassion on Jacob and again choose Israel, and settle them in their own land, then strangers will join them and attach themselves to the house of Jacob.
2 The peoples will take them along and bring them to their place, and the house of Israel will possess them as an inheritance in the land of the LORD as male servants and female servants; and they will take their captors captive and will rule over their oppressors.

In accord with the grammatical-historic hermeneutic, this passage depicts the antitype of Tabernacles just like Zechariah 14 and the “strangers” represent the Gentile overcomers in this age; the “servants” would be the “nations” that the overcomers rule with the rod of iron in NT passages like Revelation 2:25-26. That’s Premillennialism.
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I see that you didn't even bother attempting to address anything I said in my post. I assume it's because you know you can't refute anything I said. Why did you not quote the other verses that talk about Him ruling with a rod of iron for context? Do you not care about context? Read Revelation 19:15 where Him ruling with a rod of iron is described alongside Him smiting His enemies and treading them in the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. That doesn't comes across as the kind of rule you are thinking of at all. It lines up with other scrpitures that teach He will destroy all of His enemies when He returns, not rule over them (Matt 24:35-39, Luke 17:26-30, 1 Thess 5:2-3, 2 Thess 1:7-10, 2 Peter 3:10-12).

Psalm 2:7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. 9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.

The original prophecy shows that Him "ruling" with a rod of iron is about Him breaking/destroying His enemies. In no way, shape or form does this text give any indication of Him ruling over them the way you falsely think He will. He will destroy them because His wrath is on them. He will take vengeance on all of them when He returns (2 Thess 1:7-10).
The reason I didn’t address some aspects of your post is because you have the same old stale, and tired arguments, SJ, as if we haven’t heard them before; you might want to come up with a new shtick. But the greatest reason I didn’t address them is because they didn’t overcome the challenge I presented. Matthew 19:28, 24:46-47; Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; John 14:2-3; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21 all affirm Christ returns to rule in all power and authority, which means we don’t enter the eternal state when he returns. That comes later when he puts “down all rule and all authority and power,” according to 1 Corinthians 15.

Furthermore, Christ doesn’t rule with all power and authority over the saints when he returns; that’s a non-sequitur. What I present exposes your dogma as non-sequiturs. For instance, your dogma promotes the absurdity that “rule” means “destroy” in Psalms 2; the heathen “never” become the “inheritance” and “possession” of Christ in your dogma. In contradiction, 1 Corinthians 15:28 says the end comes when God is “all in all.” But God is already “all in all” with the saints when Christ returns. Evidence of power in the saints in the age to come affirms there is still force against those whom God is not “all in all.” The object of power cannot be directed to any saint in the age to come, it must be those few men left in Isaiah 24:6, which supports Premillennialism. The object of the rule, power, and authority must be upon those whom God “is not” all in all, because it can’t be upon the saints that overcome this age. And again, Matthew 19:28, 24:46-47; Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; John 14:2-3; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21 all affirm Christ returns to rule in all power and authority, which means we don’t enter the eternal state when he returns. That comes later when he puts “down all rule and all authority and power,” according to 1 Corinthians 15.

Your dogma is also guilty of proof texting. You fail to take into account “all” the parallel passages about Christ’s return and only push the ones that suit your dogma. One such passage that doesn’t agree with your dogma is Isaiah 24,

Isaiah 24:
1 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof.
2 And it shall be, as with the people, so with the priest; as with the servant, so with his master; as with the maid, so with her mistress; as with the buyer, so with the seller; as with the lender, so with the borrower; as with the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him.
3 The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken this word.
4 The earth mourneth and fadeth away, the world languisheth and fadeth away, the haughty people of the earth do languish.
5 The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant.
6 Therefore hath the curse devoured the earth, and they that dwell therein are desolate: therefore the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and few men left.

Isaiah 24 concerns the same phenomenon in Revelation 19-20; “the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and few mean are left,” which affirms Premillennialism. Christ rules over these few men that are left, those whom God “is not” all in all. The context relates, “in that day,” God gathers the “high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth” into “the pit,” and after many days they are visited again, in correspondence with Revelation 20,

Isaiah 24:
21 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the LORD shall punish the host of the high ones that are on high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth.
22 And they shall be gathered together, as prisoners are gathered in the pit, and shall be shut up in the prison, and after many days shall they be visited.
23 Then the moon shall be confounded, and the sun ashamed, when the LORD of hosts shall reign in mount Zion, and in Jerusalem, and before his ancients gloriously.

Your dogma suppresses the hermeneutic that different perspectives of the same event produce additional details.

The conflagration at Christ’s return in Revelation 19:15 can’t be used to contradict or destroy other passages of the same event, such as Zechariah 14, which maintains the rule, power, and authority of Christ’s kingdom is upon “every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem.” Zechariah 14:16. Zechariah gives us additional details about Christ’s return missing in Revelation 19:11-21 and your dogma. Furthermore, in the same verse, those left from coming against Jerusalem are compelled to observe “the feast of tabernacles.” Both the Old and New Testaments follow the pattern of the Hebraic cultic calendar that upholds the age to come as Tabernacles. God follows the plan of salvation foreshadowed by the Hebraic Festivals; your dogma does not. And Christ reigning over mortals isn’t unheard when that’s how you portray Christ’s reign now.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Spiritual Jew
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Jerry,
yes - I did rush my post and then had to do something and came back later and thought - "Oh dear - that's a little clunky - I had better tidy it up."

Revelation 5 is obviously happening around the throne of God in heaven - that is where the action is. I have started a Poll on it just for you to have a look at the results.


"MEANWHILE, IN GOTHAM CITY...."
I did not ask where the Elders on the thrones might have made a promise about the earth - I asked where Revelation actually SHOWS the thrones ON the Earth. Remember - this is apocalyptic symbolism. Parallelism is a common literary device running through Enoch and other apocalyptic writing of the period. Parallelism reminds me of how the old Batman show changes scene. "Meanwhile, in Gotham city!" and the screen twirls and the Batman trumpet jingle plays and we move to a scene with the Commissioner holding the Bat-phone behind that bland desk of his. The Commissioner and Bat-phone ground us. They are a clear signal. "Now we're in Gotham city!" Parallelism flips back and forth like that. It's how the genre works.

So what symbols act like grounding references as to where we are?

Heaven = JESUS, THE THRONE, the ELDERS on THRONES, Martyrs and White Garments.​

Earth = bad stuff.

It's not hard.


IN fact - and here is a controversial statement - I am prepared to state that I think John's actual visions and inspired truths did not actually look anything like the symbols he used in the book of Revelation. I think he was given a fresh sense of the eternal security of the martyrs, and of the gospel truths, and of the nature of the church and heaven. Apart from a very few cases, the bible does not write down dictation from God. Christianity is not Islam like that! The apostles were Spirit inspired to write the truth accurately - but they did so in the language and customs and genre of the time. John carefully crafted these images as much as Shakespeare!

So - as much as we might ask "What is God saying here to us today?" - we also need to ask "What images did JOHN use to craft this message and why?" It's not blasphemous to do so. It's hermeneutics. It's how the bible works.

John repeatedly and consistently shows that the THRONES THEMSELVES are in heaven in every single instance in Revelation!

This means the Millennium is actually reminding us that while the martyrs ARE dead - they come alive in heaven before the THRONES and with JESUS.

Problems for the Millennialist:-
IT CONTRADICTS REST OF NT:
Why do all the other verses in the NT equate Jesus returning with the raising of ALL the dead and Judgement Day and Heaven and Hell and a New Heavens and New Earth, not Jesus installing a half-heaven, half-earth, half mortal, half immortal kingdom?
Why does Revelation 20 show Jesus returning after the Millennium - not before?
Where does Revelation 20 ACTUALLY show Jesus returning to earth BEFORE the Millennium to reign DURING the Millennium on earth?

MORTALS AND IMMORTALS: Who are the 'nations' during the Millennium that are going to be deceived at the end of the Gazillion Years - when according to a literalist view, the dead martyrs have already been raised? Do we have mortals living alongside immortals? Doesn't Corinthians say that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom to come? Are you saying it can now?
Didn't Jesus say that in the age to come there would be no more marriage? In effect - no more babies? How will there be any "nations" to rebel at the end of Revelation 20 if there's no marriage and these non-Christians are all mortal? It's a Gazillion Years!

SATAN's BINDING:
The literal Millennialist insists that because we are currently in a spiritual battle with Satan - we cannot be in the Millennium. Because there’s no Satan in the Millennium, right? That’s a good question - but answering it will first involve the idea of Parallelism. We know from 24 other apocalyptic works of the time that the genre often uses a literary tool called Parallelism. In apocalyptic, this is often comparing the geopolitical darkness of the day on earth (dressed up in the theological language of monsters and symbols) with the action in heaven. But there is also what John is doing here in Revelation 20. There’s Parallelism that is roughly like an English or Art essay where we might be asked to “compare and contrast” 2 things. John uses this a LOT! EG: The great city of sin, Babylon, with the great city of light and life - the New Jerusalem. Those who took the Mark of the Beast in Rev 13, with those who did not in Rev 14. The righteous and how they fare, with the unrighteous and how they fare. Etc etc etc.

So in Revelation 13 we have Satan inspiring the Roman government persecution against God’s people. It's written in this symbolic language that shows while John is talking about the Romans - he is also warning that this applies to all Christians across all time - and that we should be ready for outbreaks of persecution like this in our own times. But it’s OK - because in Revelation 14 - the martyrs are safe!
It’s a similar scene in Revelation 20. We just saw Judgement Day at the end of Revelation 19. We are about to see it again in Revelation 20 - but from the Parallel point of view from heaven. What do we see here? We see Jesus, and the martyrs come to life before the thrones of the elders - and in Revelation they are always in heaven. John even speaks of the martyrs being safe from hell as being safe from the ‘second death’ - a weird way of talking about the pit - but they are safe from the ‘second death’ because the first death still has them! They are ‘alive’ in heaven!
Now, Satan has been bound in a very specific way! We’ve got to understand the imagery is not a geographic reality - Satan being bound in a literal pit - but a theological statement. Satan is bound with regard to 'deceiving the nations' as the gospel goes forward. That shows how ineffectual he is to prevent the growth of God's kingdom.
EG: There are now roughly a million Christians in IRAN - where there is intense persecution of Christians. As God's gospel charges into new lands, Satan's ability to 'deceive the nations' is in retreat.

DO WE SEE THIS USE OF SATAN BOUND ANYWHERE ELSE LIKE THIS?
The Greek word for "Bound" when Satan is "Bound" in Revelation 20 is ἔδησεν (edēsen). I’m no Greek scholar - but apparently this word ἔδησεν (edēsen) is the aorist active indicative, third person singular form of the verb δέω (deō).
δέω (deō) is the Greek root word and it means "to bind, tie, fasten; to imprison, to put in bonds."
This root word is the same word used in Matthew 12. The Pharisees have just accused Jesus of using Satanic powers to defeat demons. But Jesus answers that this is a matter of kingdoms at war - and that a kingdom divided against itself will fall. Then...
“Again, how can anyone enter a strong man’s house and carry off his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man? Then he can plunder his house.”
It’s the same root word deō. Jesus is here to bind Satan and carry off his plunder! How does he do this? The next few Chapters of Matthew explain the parable of the sower, the weeds in the kingdom, Judgement Day, etc. That is - Jesus is creating his kingdom through his gospel message. He is choosing people for his kingdom. That’s the plunder! Jesus is binding Satan as the gospel marches forward. (See also Mark 3:27) Also see Luke 13:11 where the woman ‘crippled’ (or bound) by Satan for years is healed by Jesus. He is unbinding her from Satan. He binds Satan’s kingdom as he frees Satan’s captives.
There is also the unusual passage of 2 Peter 2 where in a list of God’s past judgements against his enemies, it says... “For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them in chains of darkness[to be held for judgment;” etc That’s past tense. It already happened. There seems to have been some binding of demons - and 2 Peter specifically says they are there to wait for Judgement. But here’s the thing. Revelation 20 does not say that - it says Satan is bound specifically in regard to deceiving the nations.
Finally - we come to the march of the gospel as a means of binding Satan. “When the seventy returned from their preaching mission, they said to Jesus, "Lord, even the demons are subject to us in your name." Jesus replied, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven" (Luke 10:17-18) A certain kind of binding of the strongman, of the restriction of Satan’s power and kingdom, occurs as we declare the gospel.
But Jesus goes EVEN FURTHER than this when he says: "Now is the judgment of this world, now shall the ruler of this world be cast out; and I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself." John 12:31-32:
The Greek for "Cast out" in Revelation 20:3 is ebalen, and the root word is ballo: "to throw, cast, hurl, fling, cast down, throw down, put, place, lay." This is the root word for ‘will be cast out’ or the longer term ekblēthēsetai that we see in John 12:31-32!
Then when Jesus rises - he is given all power and authority - and as a result gives us the Great Commission. His reign now gives us the authority now to declare the gospel now and bind Satan’s kingdom now. Combine this with our understanding of parallelism in Revelation - we can see that John is warning us that we are in a spiritual war with Satan, and this will sometimes influence governments to turn against us. But remember - as we declare the gospel and see people saved, we are binding the strongman, taking his plunder, making Satan ‘fall like lightning’, and claiming the victory through the cross because Satan’s authority over this world WAS cast out - past tense - once and for all - on the cross! All that awaits is the final Judgement Day which we see at the end of Revelation chapter 20, at the end of this millennium that we are currently in!
It’s contradictory to hold the NT establishes “all the dead” are raised on Judgment Day, and at the same time promote profuse resurrections in heaven? How absurd! Make up your mind, Anonymous; is it “one” resurrection or “profuse” ones? How many judgment days are there? The Bible says it is appointed “once” unto men to die and then the judgment that resurrects them,

Hebrews 9
27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:

The passage above follows the hermeneutic that different perspectives of the same event produce additional details. Revelation 20 shows there is a “second death” or judgment separated by 1000 year. That means a “second” resurrection after the 1000 years. Again, differing perspectives of the same event produce additional details. Hebrews 9:27 is one passage that exposes your notion of profuse resurrections as dogma fit for the “fire” (1 Cor 3:13). It is appointed that the saints die (with the exception of those who are alive at Christ’s return) and resurrect at Christ’s return, the judgment. The belief in profuse resurrections is a pagan doctrine, claiming the immortality of the soul.

It seems you’re trying to get around the traditional amill dogma that the “first resurrection” in Revelation 20 represents being born again. How absurd, when John sees those who were beheaded alive again. Your solution isn’t any better, with its silly notion of the “thrones” in heaven for copious resurrections. And if it’s a resurrection of death to life as you concur, then ascribing the ordinal indicator “first” affirms there is a “second” separated by 1000 years in Revelation 20, in support of Premillennialism. As John 5:29 states, “they that have done good” rise “unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.” That’s two different resurrections, not one. It certainly doesn’t support copious resurrection that go to heaven and sit on thrones but don’t get to reign as kings and priests until they return to earth! How absurd.

As to your claim Christ’s return is depicted at the end of Revelation 20, verse 10 demolished such folly. Christ’s return is depicted in the previous chapter, in linear narration, where the beast and false prophet are alive to oppose his return. At the end of the 1000 years, we find the beast and false prophet already in the lake of fire. This means chapter 19 and 20 are not parallel, but in chronological order.

As to where Christ is depicted in Revelation 20, that would be the angel with the key of the bottomless pit and etc. Reformed Covenant Theology agrees Christ is depicted in the OT as the “angle of the Lord” “copious” times.
 
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,468
2,297
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟187,927.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
It’s contradictory to hold the NT establishes “all the dead” are raised on Judgment Day,

All the dead ARE raised on Judgement Day as the rest of the NT shows. But you would take a hyper literalistic and genre defying read of one small section of the most symbolic book of the bible - and super impose that over the plainer texts I have quoted elsewhere in my 2 Ages Model.

It's quite telling that you never methodically work your way through those verses to explain how they say something other than what they plainly say - yet you stage fortifying actions around your favourite verses. Quite telling indeed.

Also congratulations on noticing that 19 and 20 focus on Judgement Day from different perspectives. It's still the one Judgement Day event - just focussing on different aspects of it! There's quite a few Judgement Day references in Revelation like Chapter 6? Is that sequential as well? My goodness - just how many times is the Lord going to return?

As for the argument that the Lord is already on the Earth for the Millennium - how is it we are seeing spiritual events like the binding of Satan? Did he return with the Lord as well?
And I never said the thrones meant 24 resurrections. Does the passage even use that word? It says came alive, they see Jesus who is usually in heaven to start these scenes, and there are thones! Boy - hard to place where the action is given thrones are ALWAYS in heaven in Revelation!

Dude - until you can deal with every verse in the 2 ages model - you are advertising the illegitimacy of your position.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,725
2,194
indiana
✟326,297.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Zechariah 14 intimidates post and amills; don’t blame that on me. It’s relevant because it depicts the antitype of the Festival of Tabernacles, Succot, the name of the age to come when Christ reigns on earth before he puts “down all rule and all authority and power.” Christ isn’t reining now; we aren’t living in an ecclesiocracy (Rev 20:6).1 I’m quite aware of your eschatology, claninja.

I’ll summarize my OP but do exegete Zechariah 14 without annihilating the grammatical-historical hermeneutic if you can.

Christ didn’t come to establish “his” kingdom; the kingdom at hand was that of the Fathers. In the kingdom of God, the sheep are scattered; in Christ’s kingdom they are gathered,

Matthew 24
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

1 Thessalonians 4
16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

Jeremiah 23:
1 Woe be unto the pastors that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith the LORD.
2 Therefore thus saith the LORD God of Israel against the pastors that feed my people; Ye have scattered my flock, and driven them away, and have not visited them: behold, I will visit upon you the evil of your doings, saith the LORD.
3 And I will gather the remnant of my flock out of all countries whither I have driven them, and will bring them again to their folds; and they shall be fruitful and increase.
4 And I will set up shepherds over them which shall feed them: and they shall fear no more, nor be dismayed, neither shall they be lacking, saith the LORD.
5 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.
6 In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.

The OP cited several OT passages as the source of the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares, depicting the scattering of Israel, “the kingdom of God,” finding grace in the wilderness (Jeremiah 31:1-2; Ezekiel 34:25; Hosea 2:14-23). And of course, Matthew 19:28, 24:46-47; Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; John 14:2-3; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21 affirm that the saints rule on earth in power and authority with Christ in “his” kingdom at his return, before he puts “down all rule and all authority and power” and the eternal state commences, according to 1 Corinthians 15.

Preterists have become adroit in marketing their wares. However, by any other name, supersessionism is still the same and promotes God changed his mind to replace Israel. If He didn’t replace Israel, then the good seed gathered into the “barn” in the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares represents the remnant of Jacob with the Gentiles “attached” to them, in fulfillment of many passages in the OT,

Isaiah 14
1 When the LORD will have compassion on Jacob and again choose Israel, and settle them in their own land, then strangers will join them and attach themselves to the house of Jacob.
2 The peoples will take them along and bring them to their place, and the house of Israel will possess them as an inheritance in the land of the LORD as male servants and female servants; and they will take their captors captive and will rule over their oppressors.

In accord with the grammatical-historic hermeneutic, this passage depicts the antitype of Tabernacles just like Zechariah 14 and the “strangers” represent the Gentile overcomers in this age; the “servants” would be the “nations” that the overcomers rule with the rod of iron in NT passages like Revelation 2:25-26. That’s Premillennialism.

Zechariah 14 is absolutely a difficult passage. I’m not sure why I’d blame you for that though? That’s kind of a strange thing to say.

My simple understanding of the oracle is that it predicted a future time when the nations would be gathered together to battle Jerusalem, capture it, ransack it, and send many off into exile. However the Lord’ authority over the earth would then be realized and his judgments would result in jerusalem dwelling securely with many Israelites and those of the nations worshipping there. The living waters of Zechariah 14, when alluded to in the NT, may provide 2 main possible fulfillments —> the outpouring of the spirit (John 7:38) or the New Jerusalem (revelation 22:1-2). Thus the timing might possibly disagree with your assertion that it occurs during a future literal millennium.

as to supersessionism, “Soft” or “fulfillment” supersessionism holds that the new covenant superseded the old covenant, and thus, those from the nations were grafted into faithful Israel to become inheritors of the promises of God. In this understanding of supersessionism, the church does NOT replace Israel. So your argument appears geared toward “replacement” supersessionism and NOT supersessionism in general.

As to the eschatological gathering aspect of the kingdom of God/Heaven, which would occur at the end of the age (Matthew 13:39, Matthew 13:47-49, Matthew 24:31, Matthew 25:32), preterism does NOT believe that this was modified, repented, or changed. Preterism holds that this gathering occurred or would begin to occur in Jesus’ generation, around the time after the destruction of Jerusalem, as demonstrated by the kingdom parable of the wedding feast and the explicit words of Jesus in the olivet discourse.

Matthew 24:34 34Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have happened

Matthew 22:7-10 7The king was enraged, and he sent his troops to destroy those murderers and burn their city. 8Then he said to his servants, ‘The wedding banquet is ready, but those I invited were not worthy. 9Go therefore to the crossroads and invite to the banquet as many as you can find.’ 10So the servants went out into the streets and gathered everyone they could find, both evil and good, and the wedding hall was filled with guests.

Though considering all these things, it really doesn’t help me understand which group of people from revelation you are asking about in the OP?
 
  • Like
Reactions: eclipsenow
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,468
2,297
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟187,927.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Hi Jerry,
here's Kim Riddelbarger's 2 ages model for your kind consideration.
Enjoy.



If we begin with clear passages of Scripture, we can construct a very simple, basic model to help us with the “weirder,” tougher passages. One such approach is known as the “two-age” model. Both Jesus and Paul, for example, speak of “this age” and the “age to come” as distinct eschatological periods of time (Mt 12:32; Lk 18:30; 20:34-35; Eph 1:21). For both our Lord and the apostle, there are two contrasting ages in view. The first age (spoken of as “this age” in the New Testament) is the present period of time before the Second Coming of Christ. The second age, a distinctly future period of time, is referred to as “the age to come.” When these two ages (“this age” and “the age to come”) are placed in contrast with each other, we are able us to look at the qualities ascribed by the Biblical writers to each in such a way that we can answer questions about the timing of the return of Christ and the nature and timing of the millennium.

When we look at the qualities ascribed to “this age” by the biblical writers, we find that the following are mentioned: “homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children, and fields — and with them persecutions” (Mk 10:30); “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage” (Lk 20:34); the scholar, philosopher and such wisdom are of this age (1 Cor 1:20); secular and religious rulers dominate (1 Cor 2:6-8); “the god of this age [Satan] has blinded the minds of unbelievers” (2 Cor 4:4); this age is explicitly called “the present evil age” (Gal 1:4); ungodliness and worldly passions are typical of it (Titus 2:12). All of these qualities are temporal, and are certainly destined to pass away with the return of our Lord. “This age” is the age in which we live, and is the age in which we struggle as we long for the coming of Christ and the better things of the age to come.
By marked contrast however, “the age to come” has an entirely different set of qualities ascribed to it: There will be no forgiveness for blasphemy against the Holy Spirit (Mt 12:32); it is preceded by signs (Mt 24:3); it is characterized by eternal life (Mk 10:30; Lk 18:30); is also denoted as a time when there is no marriage or giving in marriage (Lk 20:35); and it is which is characterized by “life that is truly life” (I Tim 6:19). These qualities are all eternal, and are indicative of the state of affairs and quality of life after the return of Christ. In other words, these two ages, the present (“this age”) and the future (the “age to come”) stand in diametrical opposition to one another. One age is temporal; the other is eternal. One age is characterized by unbelief and ends in judgement; the other is the age of the faithful and is home to the redeemed. It is this conception of biblical history that dominates the New Testament.

It is also imperative to see that the same contrasts which Jesus and Paul make between these two ages are in turn related to the one event that forever divides them, the return of Christ. This line of demarcation is expressly stated in Scripture. “The harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels. As the weeds are pulled up and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of the age. . . This is how it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come and separate the wicked from the righteous” (Mt. 13:39-49). These statements are the type of clear and unambiguous texts mentioned earlier. Notice that according to this text judgement occurs immediately at Christ’s return, not after a one-thousand year millennium (as in the premillennial scheme). This is not the only line of Biblical evidence, however, for in addition to this we can find other such statements about the coming of Christ that fit very clearly into the two-age model.

According to Scripture, the resurrection of both the just and the unjust occurs simultaneously. Jesus expressly states that he will raise believers up on the “last day” (Jn 6:39, 40, 44, 54; 11:24). Thus we told quite clearly that the resurrection of the just occurs on the last day, at the end of this age. In addition, Jesus also proclaims that “There is a judge for the one who rejects me and does not accept my words; that very word which I spoke will condemn him at the last day” (John 12:48). Notice that the very same event is also said to be the time of judgment for those who reject Christ. Add to these important passages those additional verses that, relate the trumpet of God to the “last day” and to the return of Christ. The return of Christ will occur “in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed” (1 Co. 15:52; cf. 1 Thess 4:16). Notice that there are no gaps of time indicated between the resurrection and the judgement. These texts collectively speak of the resurrection, the judgment, and the return of Christ as distinct aspects of but one event, occurring at precisely the same time (cf. Mt 25:31-46). Premillennialists, who often chide amillennialists for not taking the Bible “literally” and who champion what they call the “literal” interpretation of Scripture, must now insert a thousand-year gap between the Second Coming of Christ (and the resurrection) and the Final Judgment to make room for the supposed future millennial reign of Christ! And this, ironically, when the clear declarations of Scripture do not allow for such gaps.

Thus, we can conclude that “this age” — the period of time Peter calls the “last days” (Acts 2:17), and which Jesus characterizes as a period of birth pains of wars, earthquakes, famine, and distress (Mt 24, Mk 13) — ends with the return of Christ, the resurrection and the judgement on the “last day.” An event that, by the way, Peter describes like the “day of the Lord [which] will come as a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare” (2 Pet 3:10). It is only after this that the age to come will be a present and visible reality. Notice that the focus is not upon a half-way kingdom and somewhat improved temporal age on the earth (i.e., a future millennium).

Instead, the biblical focus is upon the consummation and the summing up of all things with the creation of the new heavens and the new earth! The return of Jesus Christ is the key event in biblical prophecy. For when our Lord Jesus Christ returns, the end of the age, the resurrection, the judgment, and the creation of the new heavens and the new earth are at hand!
Thus the two-age model is very simple in its structure and is based on texts that can only be described as clear and straightforward. This enables us to make the following conclusions about the nature of the New Testament’s teaching regarding the return of Christ and the timing of the so-called “millennial age.”
A Present or Future Millennium? by Kim Riddlebarger

 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Zechariah 14 is absolutely a difficult passage. I’m not sure why I’d blame you for that though? That’s kind of a strange thing to say.

My simple understanding of the oracle is that it predicted a future time when the nations would be gathered together to battle Jerusalem, capture it, ransack it, and send many off into exile. However the Lord’ authority over the earth would then be realized and his judgments would result in jerusalem dwelling securely with many Israelites and those of the nations worshipping there. The living waters of Zechariah 14, when alluded to in the NT, may provide 2 main possible fulfillments —> the outpouring of the spirit (John 7:38) or the New Jerusalem (revelation 22:1-2). Thus the timing might possibly disagree with your assertion that it occurs during a future literal millennium.

as to supersessionism, “Soft” or “fulfillment” supersessionism holds that the new covenant superseded the old covenant, and thus, those from the nations were grafted into faithful Israel to become inheritors of the promises of God. In this understanding of supersessionism, the church does NOT replace Israel. So your argument appears geared toward “replacement” supersessionism and NOT supersessionism in general.

As to the eschatological gathering aspect of the kingdom of God/Heaven, which would occur at the end of the age (Matthew 13:39, Matthew 13:47-49, Matthew 24:31, Matthew 25:32), preterism does NOT believe that this was modified, repented, or changed. Preterism holds that this gathering occurred or would begin to occur in Jesus’ generation, around the time after the destruction of Jerusalem, as demonstrated by the kingdom parable of the wedding feast and the explicit words of Jesus in the olivet discourse.

Matthew 24:34 34Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have happened

Matthew 22:7-10 7The king was enraged, and he sent his troops to destroy those murderers and burn their city. 8Then he said to his servants, ‘The wedding banquet is ready, but those I invited were not worthy. 9Go therefore to the crossroads and invite to the banquet as many as you can find.’ 10So the servants went out into the streets and gathered everyone they could find, both evil and good, and the wedding hall was filled with guests.

Though considering all these things, it really doesn’t help me understand which group of people from revelation you are asking about in the OP?
You’re skipping a very significant point in Zechariah 14; the nations are compelled to keep Tabernacles; that’s force. That’s a huge faux pas on your part. It’s significant because the NT reveals Christ puts “down all rule and all authority and power” upon entering the eternal state, according to 1 Corinthians 15. Zechariah 14 doesn’t depict the eternal state or this age according to Matthew 19:28, 24:46-47; Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; John 14:2-3; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21, which substantiates Christ returns to rule in all power and authority over the nations.

Postmills try and use some little phrase like “living waters” to dismiss the grammatical-historical hermeneutic as well as what the NT actually upholds.

As to the eschatological gathering, you’re confusing or attempting to obfuscate, once again, the grammatical-historic interpretation of the centripetal nature of the gathering when Christ returns.

Isaiah 14
1 When the LORD will have compassion on Jacob and again choose Israel, and settle them in their own land, then strangers will join them and attach themselves to the house of Jacob.
2 The peoples will take them along and bring them to their place, and the house of Israel will possess them as an inheritance in the land of the LORD as male servants and female servants; and they will take their captors captive and will rule over their oppressors.

The grammatical-historic interpretation of the eschatological gathering of Tabernacles conveys a centripetal calling, not a centrifugal one. The former is how the ancient people of God would have understood Isaiah 14. A centrifugal calling is for this age and why Jerusalem is an abstract, the people of God at this time; it will not remain so when Christ returns.

As to the preterist’s misrepresentation of eschatological imminence, we’ve been here before and you should know I’m not going to agree. When referring to end-time events, the Bible often uses the literary device of symbolism in connection with time to conceal delay in imminence, to prevent the evil servant from taking advantage of the circumstance,

Matthew 24:
48 But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming;
49 And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken;
50 The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of,
51 And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

The OD conveys both imminence and delay, which thwarts the preterist’s misrepresentations. Christ concealed delay in eschatological imminence. Christ emphasized that wars, rumors of wars, and other related events will persist until the end of this age when he returns. Wars, rumors of wars, famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places persist to this day. Christ’s return aligns with historicists’ interpretation of the OD rather than the futurists or preterists’ interpretations.

As to the people of the Revelation, let me say in its narration, as in any dramatic narration, there are protagonists and antagonists. I do believe I related who the protagonists are; ya just need to actually read it.
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
All the dead ARE raised on Judgement Day as the rest of the NT shows. But you would take a hyper literalistic and genre defying read of one small section of the most symbolic book of the bible - and super impose that over the plainer texts I have quoted elsewhere in my 2 Ages Model.

It's quite telling that you never methodically work your way through those verses to explain how they say something other than what they plainly say - yet you stage fortifying actions around your favourite verses. Quite telling indeed.

Also congratulations on noticing that 19 and 20 focus on Judgement Day from different perspectives. It's still the one Judgement Day event - just focussing on different aspects of it! There's quite a few Judgement Day references in Revelation like Chapter 6? Is that sequential as well? My goodness - just how many times is the Lord going to return?

As for the argument that the Lord is already on the Earth for the Millennium - how is it we are seeing spiritual events like the binding of Satan? Did he return with the Lord as well?
And I never said the thrones meant 24 resurrections. Does the passage even use that word? It says came alive, they see Jesus who is usually in heaven to start these scenes, and there are thones! Boy - hard to place where the action is given thrones are ALWAYS in heaven in Revelation!

Dude - until you can deal with every verse in the 2 ages model - you are advertising the illegitimacy of your position.
Don’t go all scholarly and theologian on me, Anonymous; I’m no theologian, ya know.

Ya know, your ilk takes a hammer to the OT grammatical-historic hermeneutic, don’t ya? I even cited one of your published theologians in Amill who agrees: Vern S. Poythress. You won’t exegete on Zechariah 14 because such over-spiritualizing is embarrassing. You should know that the OT provides the interpretation of the symbolism in Revelation. And symbolism in prophecy doesn’t preclude it’s about literal phenomena; as an Idealist, you should know that, I would think.

Dude, you sure make some outrages statements; how does one take “highly symbolic language” for what it “plainly” says?

And I’m not going to “methodically work” my way to explain all the citations you claim support your view when all you did with my citations in the OP is deny them by saying they don’t meet the amill seal of approval, which I’m supposed to care about.

And congratulations on admitting Revelation 19 and 20 depict Judgment Day, which is as concession the 1000 years is the age to come, the antitype of the Feast of Tabernacles. That concedes there are two resurrections separated by 1000 years.

As for the angel in Revelation 20:1 symbolizing Christ at his return, he imprisons Satan in the pit so that he can’t prowl the earth, which wasn’t what happened at Christ’s first advent.

And again, tell me in 100 words or less, why should I be interested in Riddelbarger's false beliefs, beyond what I have to know to expose them?
 
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,468
2,297
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟187,927.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
You’re skipping a very significant point in Zechariah 14; the nations are compelled to keep Tabernacles; that’s force. That’s a huge faux pas on your part. It’s significant because the NT reveals Christ puts “down all rule and all authority and power” upon entering the eternal state, according to 1 Corinthians 15.

The problem is 1 Cor 15 also affirms the power we will have in the eternal state.

"42 So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; 43 it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; 44 it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body."

1 Cor 15:24 says: "Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power."

As the ESV Bible Commentary says:
1 Cor 15:24–28​
15:24–28 See “Jesus’ Heavenly Reign” at Acts 7:55. Although Paul’s argument in this section is difficult in its details, its thrust is clear and powerful. The Corinthians must understand that the Resurrection is not an isolated event with limited repercussions. It is rather an integrating and culminating event in God’s sovereign rule over history. Redemption is not complete “until he has put all his enemies under his feet” (v. 25, a clear reference to Ps. 110:1), and since death is “the last enemy” (v. 26), Christ’s work is not done until death is destroyed. Paul’s statement that the Son “will also be subjected” to the Father (v. 28) does not mean that the Son is inferior in dignity and being. Rather, in His messianic work the Son subjects Himself to the will of the Father “when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father” (v. 24). The climax of Christ’s submissive, messianic work is this total conquest over His enemies, “that God may be all in all,” when His absolute rule is universally acknowledged.


Zechariah 14 is a great Covenant Theology & Amil chapter!​


It's written in apocalyptic symbolism - has all the genre hallmarks. It probably describes such matters in general symbolism rather than describing literal events. However, after Zechariah it should be noted that the persecution of Antiochus 4 really damaged Jerusalem and her people.

Then the Lord stands on the Mount of Olives and it splits apart, falling away, becoming a great valley. There are 'holy ones' that arrive, there's a day without light, and living water flowing out from Jerusalem. Then the Lord is king over the whole earth! There is judgement against God's enemies. There is an image of the world paying homage to God in various Jewish understandings of the forms. The secular and boring items of household life are like items out of the temple - the mixing of the sacred and secular.

This is a fairly typical symbol of the "Day of the Lord". The OT prophets seem to combine all the ingredients of the Day of the Lord as one event. But in the NT we find it arrives in an unexpected "Now but not yet" manner in eschatological tension. In Inaugurated Theology. In other words - what the OT often pictured as the one resurrection and one judgement day and one day of salvation - all wrapped into the one event, becomes two separate events. The Day of the Lord's salvation - when he says "I am the resurrection and the life!" standing there in front of them is the Resurrection! The Judgement Day! The one with the Sword coming out of his mouth - who judges people by their reaction to his word. As John 3 says - they are ALREADY judged by rejecting God's word! But in the now and not yet sense. They are spiritually judged and sentenced - but the execution has not happened yet. So how does this relate to Zechariah 14?

JESUS SPLITS THE MOUNTAIN!
Jesus has just judged the Olive tree as he comes out of Bethany on the way to Jerusalem. Bethany is on the slopes of the Mount of Olives. The disciples ask about the fig tree - a metaphor for Israel not producing any fruit and being judged for it - and then Jesus says the weirdest thing!
Matthew 21:​
21 Jesus replied, “Truly I tell you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and it will be done. 22 If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer.”​

That is - if you believe - you will not need all the accoutrements of Israel and the temple system. IF YOU BELIEVE you can be the ones who split the Mount of Olives into a valley - and bring that living water out of Israel and change the world! If you believe the gospel - you will not need the temple system! You will not be afraid of the city of Zion itself falling into the sea - because you'll have living water which is independent of geographic location or ethnicity. Because Jesus is the temple that will be destroyed and rebuilt, and by doing so creates us to be the temple of God as we fulfil our mission in the church; he is Judgement Day on the cross - where all evil is judged - and yet will also return to execute the sentence while saving his people; he is the high priest who makes us a nation of prophets and priests; he is the living water pouring out of the middle east after Acts 1:8 where he has ALL authority and power given to him - and so gives us that authority and power to declare the gospel and share the living water with the world.

Finally - if you do not believe we have authority to reign over the world in paradise - I think you might need to go double check your theology on 'rewards in heaven' (even though it's actually the NHNE).
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The problem is 1 Cor 15 also affirms the power we will have in the eternal state.

"42 So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; 43 it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; 44 it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body."

1 Cor 15:24 says: "Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power."

As the ESV Bible Commentary says:
1 Cor 15:24–28​
15:24–28 See “Jesus’ Heavenly Reign” at Acts 7:55. Although Paul’s argument in this section is difficult in its details, its thrust is clear and powerful. The Corinthians must understand that the Resurrection is not an isolated event with limited repercussions. It is rather an integrating and culminating event in God’s sovereign rule over history. Redemption is not complete “until he has put all his enemies under his feet” (v. 25, a clear reference to Ps. 110:1), and since death is “the last enemy” (v. 26), Christ’s work is not done until death is destroyed. Paul’s statement that the Son “will also be subjected” to the Father (v. 28) does not mean that the Son is inferior in dignity and being. Rather, in His messianic work the Son subjects Himself to the will of the Father “when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father” (v. 24). The climax of Christ’s submissive, messianic work is this total conquest over His enemies, “that God may be all in all,” when His absolute rule is universally acknowledged.​

I do believe I addressed your assertion that the victory over death in 1 Corinthians 15 maintains Christ’s return inaugurates the eternal state by citing 2 Timothy,

2 Timothy 1:
10 But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality to light through the gospel.

Christ triumphed over the grave and abolished death at his first advent in the same sense Paul declared death “is swallowed up in victory” for the saints at the first resurrection. It can’t actually relate the eternal state because Christ doesn’t put “down all rule and all authority and power” at his return according to Matthew 19:28, 24:46-47; Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; John 14:2-3; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21.

You’re simply not going to surmount what these passages affirm, Mr. Anonymous and the victory over death in 1 Corinthians 15 must be understood in light of 2 Timothy 1:10.

Zechariah 14 is a great Covenant Theology & Amil chapter!​


It's written in apocalyptic symbolism - has all the genre hallmarks. It probably describes such matters in general symbolism rather than describing literal events. However, after Zechariah it should be noted that the persecution of Antiochus 4 really damaged Jerusalem and her people.

Then the Lord stands on the Mount of Olives and it splits apart, falling away, becoming a great valley. There are 'holy ones' that arrive, there's a day without light, and living water flowing out from Jerusalem. Then the Lord is king over the whole earth! There is judgement against God's enemies. There is an image of the world paying homage to God in various Jewish understandings of the forms. The secular and boring items of household life are like items out of the temple - the mixing of the sacred and secular.

This is a fairly typical symbol of the "Day of the Lord". The OT prophets seem to combine all the ingredients of the Day of the Lord as one event. But in the NT we find it arrives in an unexpected "Now but not yet" manner in eschatological tension. In Inaugurated Theology. In other words - what the OT often pictured as the one resurrection and one judgement day and one day of salvation - all wrapped into the one event, becomes two separate events. The Day of the Lord's salvation - when he says "I am the resurrection and the life!" standing there in front of them is the Resurrection! The Judgement Day! The one with the Sword coming out of his mouth - who judges people by their reaction to his word. As John 3 says - they are ALREADY judged by rejecting God's word! But in the now and not yet sense. They are spiritually judged and sentenced - but the execution has not happened yet. So how does this relate to Zechariah 14?

JESUS SPLITS THE MOUNTAIN!
Jesus has just judged the Olive tree as he comes out of Bethany on the way to Jerusalem. Bethany is on the slopes of the Mount of Olives. The disciples ask about the fig tree - a metaphor for Israel not producing any fruit and being judged for it - and then Jesus says the weirdest thing!
Matthew 21:​
21 Jesus replied, “Truly I tell you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and it will be done. 22 If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer.”​

That is - if you believe - you will not need all the accoutrements of Israel and the temple system. IF YOU BELIEVE you can be the ones who split the Mount of Olives into a valley - and bring that living water out of Israel and change the world! If you believe the gospel - you will not need the temple system! You will not be afraid of the city of Zion itself falling into the sea - because you'll have living water which is independent of geographic location or ethnicity. Because Jesus is the temple that will be destroyed and rebuilt, and by doing so creates us to be the temple of God as we fulfil our mission in the church; he is Judgement Day on the cross - where all evil is judged - and yet will also return to execute the sentence while saving his people; he is the high priest who makes us a nation of prophets and priests; he is the living water pouring out of the middle east after Acts 1:8 where he has ALL authority and power given to him - and so gives us that authority and power to declare the gospel and share the living water with the world.

Your cut and paste amill interpretation of Zechariah 14 reminds me of someone who imbibed something trippy before they read it, Mr. Anonymous. It’s kind of new age.

As I stated previously, you should know that the OT provides the interpretation of the symbolism in Revelation and in the case of Zechariah 14, Daniel 2 is indispensable to the serious student,

Daniel 2:
34 Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces…
42 And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.

Daniel tells us Christ establishes his kingdom in the days of the ten toes or kings also conveyed in Daniel 7 and Revelation 17, which certainly wasn’t Christ’s first advent; Christ’s first advent was at the time of the legs of iron. The head, breast, belly, and legs represented successive kingdoms or empires; consequently, Daniel wasn’t taking about Christ’s return and filling the whole earth during the Roman empire but the time of the kingdoms that supplanted that Empire who have not cleaved to one another to this day but rule concurrently. Daniel 2:44 affirms Christ sets up his kingdom with kings that rule concurrently, just like the kings in Revelation 17.

Furthermore, you’re still missing the point that Zechariah 14 conveys the nations are compelled to keep Tabernacles; that’s force. That’s a huge faux pas on your part. It’s significant because the NT reveals Christ puts “down all rule and all authority and power” upon entering the eternal state, according to 1 Corinthians 15. Zechariah 14 doesn’t depict the eternal state or this age according to Matthew 19:28, 24:46-47; Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; John 14:2-3; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21, which substantiates Christ returns to rule in all power and authority over the nations.

Finally - if you do not believe we have authority to reign over the world in paradise - I think you might need to go double check your theology on 'rewards in heaven' (even though it's actually the NHNE).

My scriptures trump yours,

Matthew 16:
27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.

Revelation 11:
18 And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.

Revelation 22:
12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,468
2,297
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟187,927.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
By the way - did you know it was against forum rules to give people childish nicknames and repeat them endlessly?

Check the goading and flaming rules.

Also 2 Timothy 1 is about the gospel abolishing death - and has nothing to do with the Millennium. That's some pretty desperate plucking out of context - feeling desperate are we?

Your respectful tone and polite manner are as delightful as always.

Have a great day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spiritual Jew
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
By the way - did you know it was against forum rules to give people childish nicknames and repeat them endlessly?

Check the goading and flaming rules.

Also 2 Timothy 1 is about the gospel abolishing death - and has nothing to do with the Millennium. That's some pretty desperate plucking out of context - feeling desperate are we?

Your respectful tone and polite manner are as delightful as always.

Have a great day.

I do believe trolling is also against the rules, making statements that upset others, trying to elicit emotional responses. I warned you I don’t appreciate condescending comments like I’m going to wake up some day and see you’re right. Those types of comments are common in your responses. You should know by now I'm not going to see the issues your way and have the grace to let me be. And I kept a copy of that special email response of yours to CC the mods if I have to. Tell you what, keep those comments to yourself and I’ll avoid using the anonymous label. But it's time for you to end your comments, cause I'm not going to agree with you and it's trolling on your part as far as I'm concerned. I don't want to report you but....

As for Timothy, the point is there is a sense Christ abolished death at his resurrection and in the same sense death is conquered further when Christ returns to establish his rule, power and authority. But it's not the end when he puts down that rule, power and authority.

And the comment I'm feeling desperate is just the continuance of trolling, for that matter.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
9,468
2,297
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟187,927.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
You should know by now I'm not going to see the issues your way and have the grace to let me be.
It's not trolling to want discuss why someone holds a different interpretation when they have posted in a public forum for discussion. Indeed - I know discussions on forums like this can change opinions when confronted with enough data - because it has happened to me.

And I kept a copy of that special email response of yours to CC the mods if I have to.
If you must - but isn't that the post I felt bad about and apologised for? While we then immediately had other issues - I thought we had moved on from that?
But it's time for you to end your comments, cause I'm not going to agree with you and it's trolling on your part as far as I'm concerned...
Again - public forum. I'm discussing the topic. Trolling is an off topic goad to wreck the conversation.

And if it's matter of tone - go through and tally up the most sarcastic and condescending comments. You'll find I'm not the only one with issues with your tone.
As for Timothy, the point is there is a sense Christ abolished death at his resurrection and in the same sense death is conquered further when Christ returns
Exactly. But that's where it should be left. Because when he returns the dead are raised and all are judged and there is no more crying or pain or sin. A half righteous half worldly, half resurrected half mortal kingdom of the returned Christ is anathema to the rest of the New Testament.


And the comment I'm feeling desperate is just the continuance of trolling, for that matter.
That this was an unfortunate comment we agree. (Although it's probably goading more than trolling. Again trolling is of topic rubbish designed to get a huge reaction.)

But this time I'll only apologize if you will acknowledge you also know how to dish it out as well. Again - if you got an objective friend to do a tone tally - I think you would be surprised to see how the count came out. 8 am not the only commenter here that has had an issue with your tone.
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,111
141
Tucson
Visit site
✟284,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It's not trolling to want discuss why someone holds a different interpretation when they have posted in a public forum for discussion. Indeed - I know discussions on forums like this can change opinions when confronted with enough data - because it has happened to me.


If you must - but isn't that the post I felt bad about and apologised for? While we then immediately had other issues - I thought we had moved on from that?

Again - public forum. I'm discussing the topic. Trolling is an off topic goad to wreck the conversation.

And if it's matter of tone - go through and tally up the most sarcastic and condescending comments. You'll find I'm not the only one with issues with your tone.

Exactly. But that's where it should be left. Because when he returns the dead are raised and all are judged and there is no more crying or pain or sin. A half righteous half worldly, half resurrected half mortal kingdom of the returned Christ is anathema to the rest of the New Testament.



That this was an unfortunate comment we agree. (Although it's probably goading more than trolling. Again trolling is of topic rubbish designed to get a huge reaction.)

But this time I'll only apologize if you will acknowledge you also know how to dish it out as well. Again - if you got an objective friend to do a tone tally - I think you would be surprised to see how the count came out. 8 am not the only commenter here that has had an issue with your tone.
Your comment that “discussions on forums like this can change opinions when confronted with enough data” is just another way of saying to me “one day you're going to wake up and realize” I'm right, and you're wrong. That's what you have overtly stated to me and that’s trolling. It’s irrelevant and inflammatory to a debate and fits the definition of trolling,

Trolling is the act of deliberately provoking or upsetting others online by posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or content. This behavior can disrupt conversations and create conflict… Trolling - (English 11) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable

Comments like yours are irrelevant, inflammatory and presumptuous, and you just can’t resist being overt about it. One might think they're right, we all do if we’re honest, but most have the grace to keep such hubris to themselves and deal strictly with the issues, which you can’t. And when you don't, I'm tempted to respond with sarcasm, which unfortunately I've succumbed to, but I'm done with it.

We are at an impasse, which is the grammatical-historical hermeneutic. I start with the literal interpretation and determine what's allegorical from there. It’s one of my highest presuppositions in interpreting scripture; it’s not one of yours. You are not going to change my mind and I’m not going to change yours, so what is the point of further argument?

At this juncture if you continue to argue for the purpose of changing my mind, I’m going to have to report you, and we’ll see what happens.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.