Whistleblower warns FBI can’t be trusted with background checks for Trump’s nominees

[DaisyDay]

This was a huge problem for Hillary back when Bill was president. A lot of their people were criminals and could not be vetted.

Lols, bald assertion is worthless. Also, rank what-aboutism.

 

[NxNW]

How is it honorable to prosecute your own son on charges brought forth as a result of Russian disinformation?

At least we agree the pardon was justified.

 

[NxNW]

Trump will not be removed from office unless the Left tries to kill him again.

The only attempt on Trump's life was from his own party.

The party for Left-Wing deep state Authoritarian spying lawfare and corruption is over. The people have spoken. The Left was ousted. Now it's time for Trump to fulfill the will of the people.

This party is just getting started.

How can the party be over if it's just getting started?

 

[HARK!]

How can the party be over if it's just getting started?

We are moving from one party to the next.

 

[Say it aint so]

An official at FBI headquarters in Washington is warning that the bureau’s security clearance division is politicized and can’t be trusted to screen President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees for top administration jobs.

The allegations of political bias at the FBI’s security division, or SecD, were revealed in a protected whistleblower disclosure sent to the House Judiciary Committee, which The Washington Times reviewed.

The official said the security clearance process has been “contaminated by the political agendas of [security division] officials and other executives in the FBI.”

Whistleblower warns FBI can’t be trusted with background checks for Trump’s nominees

An official at FBI headquarters in Washington is warning that the bureau’s security clearance division is politicized and can’t be trusted to screen President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees for top administration jobs.

www.washingtontimes.com

The corruption in the Deep State swamp runs deep.

My goodness. The Moonie Paper the Washington Times. I give this story one eye roll simply because I can't get beyond the claims. Their links take you no where. It's odd Trump never had a problem with having his admin pass background checks last go round less Jared and Ivanka for obvious reasons. Concerns Jared validated at the end of this term. It's odd that a group, the FBI, who as a whole are mostly conservative including Wray, are seen as this cabal to go after their own kind with the same kind of conservative views. Maybe, just maybe, it this has more to do with the kind of horrid picks Trump is trying to have sail through nomination than the background process itself. It is that hard to find people who aren't sexually abusing teenagers, misogynists, drunkards, and just plain ol crazy?

 

[Diamond72]

bald assertion is worthless.

I read a book written by the FBI agent who was assigned the job of vetting their people.
NOW it is against the law to write a book like that.

"Unlimited Access: An FBI Agent Inside the Clinton White House" by Gary Aldrich. Aldrich, an FBI agent, wrote about his experiences and the challenges he faced while conducting background checks on members of the Clinton administration. It's an intriguing read that provides insight into the inner workings of the White House during that time.