• With the events that occured on July 13th, 2024, a reminder that posts wishing that the attempt was successful will not be tolerated. Regardless of political affiliation, at no point is any type of post wishing death on someone is allowed and will be actioned appropriately by CF Staff.

  • Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Trump: States he has every right to interfere in a Presidential Election

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
19,492
12,184
Earth
✟179,616.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat


Maybe listen to between 10 and 14 minutes within the interview and probably most people will keep their same views on Trump. Whatever people decide, I think this is an example of left wing garbage media distortion.
I dunno, it has a lot of all my enemies are in cahoots! vibe, going on.

This is not a rational thought to think, let alone try to use as an argument as why he might lose the 2024 Presidential Election.

This is an “own-goal”.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

E pluribus unum
Mar 11, 2017
17,580
13,846
54
USA
✟339,980.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It speaks for itself. IMO your post was the distortion by trying to make charges that were not charges of insurrection sound the same as or equal to . The fact is there was no insurrection by those rioters or by Trump and all of this liberal propaganda is just furthering the agenda of the left.
What does this sound like to you:

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
5,722
1,969
South
✟139,099.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What does this sound like to you:

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
What does this sound like to you?

From thefederalcriminalattorneys.com: “While many have been convicted of other crimes related to the riots, none have been charged under 18 U.S.C. 2383.”

The revolutionary war was an insurrection Jan 6 was a protest turned into a riot. No one has been charged with insurrection as you continue to imply. Not interested in your analysis the facts are the facts.

From Google: “Approximately 718 individuals have pleaded guilty to a variety of federal charges, many of whom faced or will face incarceration at sentencing. Approximately 213 have pleaded guilty to felonies. Another 505 have pleaded guilty to misdemeanors.Jan 5, 2024”

Pleading guilty as we know from the Hunter Biden debacle does not always imply actual guilt. Hunter said he pled guilty to save the family the embarrassment. But for a variety of reasons many choose to plead guilty for reduced sentences, lack of funds to fight, threats to go after family friends or just weariness. Some pled guilty because the were guilty of rioting but no one was charged with insurrection.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

E pluribus unum
Mar 11, 2017
17,580
13,846
54
USA
✟339,980.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
What does this sound like to you?

From thefederalcriminalattorneys.com: “While many have been convicted of other crimes related to the riots, none have been charged under 18 U.S.C. 2383.”

The revolutionary war was an insurrection Jan 6 was a protest turned into a riot. No one has been charged with insurrection as you continue to imply. Not interested in your analysis the facts are the facts.
It was more of a coup attempt backed by a mob of duped supporters.
From Google: “Approximately 718 individuals have pleaded guilty to a variety of federal charges, many of whom faced or will face incarceration at sentencing. Approximately 213 have pleaded guilty to felonies. Another 505 have pleaded guilty to misdemeanors.Jan 5, 2024”

Pleading guilty as we know from the Hunter Biden debacle does not always imply actual guilt. Hunter said he pled guilty to save the family the embarrassment. But for a variety of reasons many choose to plead guilty for reduced sentences, lack of funds to fight, threats to go after family friends or just weariness. Some pled guilty because the were guilty of rioting but no one was charged with insurrection.
Are you now claiming Hunter Biden *didn't* violate the laws requiring him to file and pay his taxes on time?
 
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
5,722
1,969
South
✟139,099.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are you now claiming Hunter Biden *didn't* violate the laws requiring him to file and pay his taxes on time?
No not at all. He claimed it was to save his family the embarrassment which was probably partially true. The overriding reason was to protect Joe from what we all know to be true, selling influence to foreign governments. Say does that sound at least illegal to you or maybe even treasonous? We all know Joe will fip flop and pardon Hunter. What a convenient arrangement. Everybody goes free whoopee.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
5,722
1,969
South
✟139,099.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It was more of a coup attempt backed by a mob of duped supporters.
Ridiculous, this was no attempt to overthrow the government! Did you think the guy with the funny head dress was wanting to be president? Nonsense how can liberals believe this junk?
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
18,691
12,789
71
Bondi
✟293,892.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
No not at all. He claimed it was to save his family the embarrassment which was probably partially true. The overriding reason was to protect Joe from what we all know to be true, selling influence to foreign governments. Say does that sound at least illegal to you or maybe even treasonous? We all know Joe will fit flop and pardon Hunter. What a convenient arrangement. Everybody goes free whoopee.
He's already declared that he wouldn't pardon his son. And Trump has already declared that he will pardon those jailed for Jan 6. As much as we know how much Trump lies, he (and Biden) are telling the truth in this case.
 
Upvote 0

Postvieww

Believer
Sep 29, 2014
5,722
1,969
South
✟139,099.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
He's already declared that he wouldn't pardon his son. And Trump has already declared that he will pardon those jailed for Jan 6. As much as we know how much Trump lies, he (and Biden) are telling the truth in this case.
I am well aware of what Biden said, but you can write this date down , Hunter will be pardoned even If Joe steps down and Kamala does it . It will happen !
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

E pluribus unum
Mar 11, 2017
17,580
13,846
54
USA
✟339,980.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
No not at all. He claimed it was to save his family the embarrassment which was probably partially true. The overriding reason was to protect Joe from what we all know to be true, selling influence to foreign governments. Say does that sound at least illegal to you or maybe even treasonous? We all know Joe will fip flop and pardon Hunter. What a convenient arrangement. Everybody goes free whoopee.
I don't know why you are talking about pleas. I mentioned nothing of pleas.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

E pluribus unum
Mar 11, 2017
17,580
13,846
54
USA
✟339,980.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Ridiculous, this was no attempt to overthrow the government! Did you think the guy with the funny head dress was wanting to be president? Nonsense how can liberals believe this junk?
I can't fill in the gaps in your awareness.
 
Upvote 0