Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then perhaps this will help mitigate the bewilderment. It is beneficial to engage our enemies. I understand sometimes they can be bought off. Doesn't seem to had much of a positive result on Iran. Oh well.
Sounds to me like "Vain imagination."Engaging our enemies in an official capacity....certainly. Putin understand Trump is a transactional man....I can only imagine the favors exchanged. Oh well, I guess we'll never know unless the Kremlin releases the recordings of their conversations...
The Logan Act, which "makes it illegal for American citizens to negotiate with foreign governments in dispute with the United States without prior approval, was introduced in 1799 and is meant to prevent unauthorized diplomacy from undermining the current administration’s position."It is beneficial to engage our enemies.
I could call Putin. so what. He would not answer. Now if I called with information on sensitive gov info that may not be a windmill, but rather an issue. anyone can write a book and many these days do and publish online. Again So what?The Logan Act, which "makes it illegal for American citizens to negotiate with foreign governments in dispute with the United States without prior approval, was introduced in 1799 and is meant to prevent unauthorized diplomacy from undermining the current administration’s position."
You seem perplexed about this. Woodward is NOT saying complimentary things about Trump. I hope we can agree on that. We know he is a rabid Trump hater because he just wrote an...unflattering trilogy of books - THREE - books about him. I cited all this above.No no, it doesn't work THAT way.
If you make a claim that woodward is "disparaging" Trump, I don't know if you are saying that the content of his books are true or not. IF he is representing and writing about Trump's actions, it's totally reasonable for me to ask you whether any content currently in the book HAS been proven as false. In fact, has Woodward EVER had issues with truthfulness? For any president? Also, it's not disparaging if you are reporting his actions.
Those things are easily proven false. Trump
I'm asking you to prove you have a basis to question his credibility.
How Gorbachev and Reagan's Friendship Helped Thaw the Cold War | HISTORY Reagan met with and had a friendship with Gorbachev. There is far more to worry about with the Democrat party.Indeed. Those of us who recall a Republican Party of Regan that detested leaders such as Kim and Putin are a bit puzzled by the party's apparent turn.
How Gorbachev and Reagan's Friendship Helped Thaw the Cold War | HISTORY Reagan met with and had a friendship with Gorbachev. There is far more to worry about with the Democrat party.
Have you read any of them?No, it's indeed a deflection to a different question. And "what people do here" is irrelevant.
One should have substantive information backed by a legitimate source before making remarks that are not clearly just opinion. "Harris or Trump would be a bad President" = Opinion. "Harris (or Trump) stated this illegal or bad thing." =authoritative assertion which requires proof beyond "Trust me, bro".
But this is just Woodward expanding upon his favorite subject recently, Trump disparagement. He wrote THREE separate rant books about him - not one, as he has done for some other Presidents,
See here's the thing. IT really doesn't MATTER if things are "complimentary" or not.You seem perplexed about this. Woodward is NOT saying complimentary things about Trump. I hope we can agree on that. We know he is a rabid Trump hater because he just wrote an...unflattering trilogy of books - THREE - books about him. I cited all this above.
Well, it's pretty commonly known that Trump has had 1 to 1 conversations with Putin. This is not a surprise. Several people have confirmed that conversation.He is using an anonymous source here to say the quote in the original quote. He doesn't even know if Trump spoke to Putin. He just "may have." But pay attention to how all the propagandist media is running with it as if it is established as true, when it is not. It's just "somebody said it may have happened". Nope.
IF you use a source that is unnamed, is it appropriate to FULLY assert that it did happen? No. OF course not. You can't definitively say that is a third party reporting on the incident."..and may have spoken with Putin seven times since Trump left the White House in 2020. This, according to an unnamed Trump aide in Bob Wooward's upcoming book:
"Trump denied the reporting, telling ABC News' Jonathan Karl that Woodward is “a storyteller. A bad one. And he’s lost his marbles.”
LOL!!! What a baby.Trump had previously spoken to Woodward for the journalist's 2021 book, “Rage.” Trump later sued over it, claiming Woodward never had permission to publicly release recordings of their interviews for the book. The publisher and Woodward denied his allegations."
Steven Cheung, Trump’s communications director, said none of the stories in Woodward’s books are true."
3 and half books on Trump. The fourth book also covers the Biden campaign and the early months of the Biden administration.You seem perplexed about this. Woodward is NOT saying complimentary things about Trump. I hope we can agree on that. We know he is a rabid Trump hater because he just wrote an...unflattering trilogy of books - THREE - books about him. I cited all this above.
That's true. I didn't mention the "half book".3 and half books on Trump. The fourth book also covers the Biden campaign and the early months of the Biden administration.
Woodward has also written two books on Obama, two on Clinton, four on GW Bush, one on the first Bush, and five on Nixon/Watergate.
Woodward writes a lot of books about presidents.
Oddly Trump keeps sitting for interviews with him.That's true. I didn't mention the "half book".
But he has not written in such a prolific or demonizing way about any other President. If you read his tweets back during the Old Twitter era, you know he is rabidly anti-Trump. Not exactly an impartial source of information.
What did he write that was both "demonizing" and false?That's true. I didn't mention the "half book".
But he has not written in such a prolific or demonizing way about any other President. If you read his tweets back during the Old Twitter era, you know he is rabidly anti-Trump. Not exactly an impartial source of information.
I was once told that an Irishman who doesn't drink loses his status as an Irishman. I think it might be that way for Russians, too.(As a Russian, he apparently doesn't drink)
I’m only 1/4 Irish, but my soul is Russian because of all the vodka I’ve consumedI was once told that an Irishman who doesn't drink loses his status as an Irishman. I think it might be that way for Russians, too.
He goes into the lion's den regularly. Harris has not done so; she fears questions.Oddly Trump keeps sitting for interviews with him.
But he's never going to go back into the lioness's den again, is he?He goes into the lion's den regularly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?