- Aug 20, 2019
- 12,025
- 12,921
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
We've heard "we should switch to single payer health care as soon as possible because look how great it worked in country XYZ", "we should do publicly funded Tuition because XYZ did it and it's working great", "we should implement XYZ's model of gun control asap", etc...
Yet the one thing where he's actually taking that approach, and suddenly it's a problem.
I guess. That still seems like a strange way to argue the point. Is it a problem? That's my question. Is this the best way to do it. Do we just stop producing the penny, let'ssay, tomorrow? If your argument is that we should because other "progressive" countries have, then I think your argument for doing so is strangely self-defeating in relation to your larger point. Why is this the best thing to do? I definitely think Trump is shooting from the hip and that he has more change than sense, whatever, but do you think this is a good idea?
Upvote
0