You have it all backwards, of course. Since God has asked me to warn the sheep in this way, I draw judgment if I fail to speak out and do what I am doing.
God never violates His own Word. Can I suppose you're a fan of what is represented as the Book of Enoch? This is a common behavior among those who read this "revelation".
it was more like inspired writing . . . he would sit down with a pen and just start writing, as his imagination progressed, his story unfolded. He never actually visited heaven, despite the impression he gave at first.
Of course it was inspired writing. That's called prophecy. Prophecy is more than "Thus saith the Lord" and "vision" is more than being translated in the spirit. Revelation can come like a flood. It is sometimes build precept upon precept over a course of time. Prophetic understanding and knowledge can take place over time. His occurred over time.
I never visited Heaven either, yet I've appeared before God twice in my dreams. Both times having passed through "space". Once as a teenager and the other right before I repented from my backsliding. Although I make no claims whatsoever as going to Heaven, I have absolutely no doubt that God spoke to me, and that I was in His presence, communicating His heart in prophetic knowledge and understanding to me (not words).
She's one of the chief wolves in sheep clothing.
What are the fruits? Her ministry magnifies Jesus, preaches the gospel, gets people saved and filled. The call is to repentance and faith. She edifies the Body of Christ. Even if their were some doctrine incorporated that seemed a little extreme (to borrow a term), that does not make her a wolf. Furthermore, if such a doctrine did exist that was that radical, it would be commonly known. I may not share some of the manifestations in some people's meetings, but that does not warrant a personal judgment as an enemy of Christ.
In fact, the Word specifically states that personal judgment of God's servants warrants that same judgment. The difference between Paul's judging and yours, is that Paul did it by revelation of the Holy Spirit. Your "discernment" from your last post and now here, can in no way be confused to be spiritual (of the Holy Spirit). That is the difference. People who take the mantle of judging without revelation always justify themselves in the actions of Paul, but Paul did not act independently.
You've obviously never read Paul and his challenges and rebukes to others claiming to be servants of God. It's not all happy, happy, joy, joy. Sometimes, shepherds need to protect the flock and chase off the wolves. And sometimes, like Paul confronted Peter, one shepherd needs to challenge another demanding repentance. Until they do, my position on them remains unchanged as it is a message from God, a prophetic call to repentance. I will not pull it back or repent, it is not me who is sinning here.
Furthermore, she is not approaching "your flock". If you disagreed with her doctrine and she was preaching in your church, that might be different. Peter was fellowshipping among the flock Paul was watching over. It was his hypocrisy at that moment that he was rebuked for. He was NOT called a wolf either. It was a specific behavior that was challenged. Furthermore, the rebuke of elders is done with a (local) witness, and is not a public matter.
Why do believers feel they can break scripture about judgment using Paul as an excuse? When challenged to repent, they stand self-assured. You even believe God sends a message to violate His own Word. Who is amiss? You've made a number of serious accusations against some very anointed servants of God (wno are not perfect), and your stance is not to repent.
Go out of the box for a minute. Consider "if" you were wrong about receiving your judgment from the Holy Spirit: Think about it. One day you'll appear before God to answer for that judgment you have taken upon yourself. The result of that judgment at minimum is that you would be found a wolf among the flock. Are you going to stand behind your claim of hearing this from God? I strongly urge you to reconsider because you will reap what you sow.
Upvote
0