My apologies. Obviously I have problems and issues.
The poor have a friend in Jesus and in all believers that have compassion. One might compare the house of Saul to the house of David with a dilemma you consider.
“David left Gath and escaped to the cave of Adullam. When his brothers and his father’s household heard about it, they went down to him there. All those who were in distress or in debt or discontented gathered around him, and he became their commander. About four hundred men were with him” (1 Samuel 22:1-2).
Here we have the poor, the discontented being on the righteous side, while Saul and ones around him were carrying on in doing "works" toward God. You have some good discernment in seeing how far some churches have gone from their faith. Hating hypocrisy is Ok, but sometimes we do this in judging others. The fact is we all our hypocrites except Jesus. If others are not genuine sometimes it is best just left to God.
Suppose one Christian is made rich, and all their gains were righteous and just. They gave and in turn God blessed them, though that was not the motivation. Others though are like Eli's sons, as priests they overcharged for the sacrifices, putting themselves first and for a time had wealth their way. For a time both these examples might be equally rich, but God has the motives, the rewards, the judgment.
Another issue I see in discontent with wealth is a world mentality that we have limited resources. Yes, the world things that if one receives much, then some will be totally left behind in poverty. However, when we add God to the occasion, resources really are not limited. God can give a preacher two planes and still bless everyone else that he desires. The problem is that we sometimes cannot know what is just. So i do not sweat other's prosperity because it does not take away from mine. I too have escaped this "wealth" dilemma by spending time in some of the poorest nations where things are far more real and motives easier to see.
The classic definition of politics is "who gets what when and where." This power draws evil people. The only way it is put in check is through a Constitution or people that are givers, not takers. Term limits, less pay, no using your past position to lobby in the future, etc. The founders of the US tried to limit government, but stuff like the income tax amendment got changed later. The founders simply did not fully imagine enough people would be depraved and corrupt to do most anything. As one put it, the U.S. was designed to be a moral and religious nation. it seems the writers of Pink Floyd were correct in assuming dogs, sheep and pigs?
the Dogs represent the ruthless business men, the Pigs are the corrupt leaders and the Sheep are the ignorant and impressionable common folk."
To me it is interesting that God in Matt. 10:16 says "“I am sending you out like sheep surrounded by wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves." Why can't Christianity get with the program?
Consider too, the parable of the employer who paid wages to employees that did not take into account the hours that each had worked. It seemed unjust, but the wages were agreed upon. Thus, we have to just turn outcomes over to God. God is just and even evildoers that prosper for a time will take a huge hit in this lifetime or at judgment. Anyway, just a few thoughts to consider. 
