All of your responses have convinced me even more that I would not want you to teach this subject to children.
The condescension - the little jabs at my intellect and maybe even my morality - and all while never sharing a single fact.
I'm convinced you would treat any student the same way who had doubts or questions about all these statements you are making.
That's strange. I'm literally personality mirroring but you're right, it is a frustrating way of conversing.
I am asking you to list what particular aspect of the evidence of AGW you have difficulty with and you also, "never sharing a single fact".
And in regards to my capacity to teach, you'd be wrong there as well.
I LOVE informing my students and when they have doubts and questions I LOVE to help. I would posit though, that my junior high student also know that if they have HAVE questions and doubts, they need to be kind of specific. They can't just say "I disagree with finding equivalent Fractions!" because that's not a complaint. Nor is it a useful way to say "I don't understand equivalent fractions". There are MANY different things that can trip someone up.
I expect them to be able to pinpoint WHERE they have a problem with finding equivalent fractions; whether it's a strategy, or a concept they don't understand or a calculation that trips them up. Then I work with them to help them understand the problem.
THIS is why I was asking you to share WHERE you are struggling with AGW.
I have trouble understanding why I am obliged to share the things you already know and, as you say in post 13,
"I said that I would need to know how the information was presented before I could object to it being included in the book.
I said that I would not initially object to topics - like climate change - being presented in the book."
This makes me think that you already KNOW the information that is being provided in the book, but you don't know about HOW it is presented. So, if you already "know" the information, what is the purpose in me repeating it? I want to understand your "how" better.