Subduction Zone
Regular Member
And why would a Buddhist say this?
By not being atheist
By being Christian
Upvote
0
And why would a Buddhist say this?
By not being atheist
By being Christian
And why would a Buddhist say this?
You appear to be your own type of Buddhist since there is nothing about following Christianity in that religion. They would agree with some things in the religion, but then most religions agree on some points. They would also disagree on others. You appear to be a poorly disguised Christian is all. Buddhist tend to value rational thinking.
I am Christian as well as Buddhist
Because why not
No. Buddhists tend to understand about delusion. You appear to subscribe to Moha:
Near Death videos
You appear to be your own type of Buddhist
Yes, and is usually a terribly flawed belief since people do not do so rationally. You pick what you think is right from each religion, meanwhile you can easily miss the main message of both religions. Your relying on NDE's is not Buddhist as all.
Syncretism is the combining of different beliefs and various schools of thought.
From Wikipedia
Your relying on NDE's is not Buddhist
Pascal's wager is a self-contradictory and selfish fallacy.It's like buying insurance of a kind
Pascal's wager is a self-contradictory and selfish fallacy.
If pretending to believe, "like buying insurance of a kind", helps you, then you're welcome to it.Pascal’s wager is merely an attempt to help
If pretending to believe… helps you, then you're welcome to it.
Accepting without evidence is faith, an unjustified form of belief. Accepting without evidence, "like buying insurance of a kind", is fake faith, a pretence.accepting God… just accepting
Accepting without evidence
Exactly, the words of a classic con.
Accepting God sounds great! But doesn't that mean I have to have some concept of what I'm accepting?
But is just "accepting" enough if you don't even have a clue what you are accepting?
How does that help your position?
And you are wrong! Congrats.