- May 19, 2007
- 1,874
- 94
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
There should be some discussion about this topic, as it is a current topic among traditionalists and pentecostals.
If you have someone in mind, invite them to this thread, and I'll be glad to set something up for you.There should be some discussion about this topic, as it is a current topic among traditionalists and pentecostals.
Ok, you have my attention but I don't know how interested you are in doctrine and theology. Pentecostals are traditionalists, they are a thriving fundamentalist movement so your proposing a false dichotomy. The former rain and later rain while have an interesting interpretive appeal doesn't really define what exactly you think did or did not cease in the Apostolic age.
I assume your talking about speaking in tongues.
That's not why I'm responding, what do you mean 'if you believe in the rapture'? That's really just another word for the resurrection, it's in no way tied to God's gifts of grace for the building up of the body of Christ.
If you have a serious proposal in mind I will be glad to consider it. What exactly is it you want to debate?
Grace and peace,
Mark
There is no doubt that charismatic gifts would eventually disappear as it would be described in Corinthians.
That much is clear.
At the heart of the debate is whether there should be considered a third option to be explored, that is of a latter-rain revival of the same gifts.
For those that believe in the rapture, one must also believe that the latter rains include the same gifts as part of the same end-time event.
In other words, if you believe in the rapture but reject the gifts that come with the latter rains, you can't have it both ways.
Any further interest in this topic?