Not that idiot. Let's discuss his 'reasons"
10. Jesus was famous for giving away free healthcare.
That has nothing to do with the government giving out free health. Absolutely pointless to discuss the miracles of Jesus with government doing healthcare, but that is a theme common with such writings that they are trying to use the government to replace God, as we see in his other "reasons"
9. Rich Evangelicals would see him as a divisive candidate who waged class warfare.
The same goes for Rich non-evangelicals, but the point Jesus was making was about a rich person trusting their riches rather than Christ, but the fact remains that conservatives and that would include most evangelicals out give liberals since they believe charity should be an individual's role, not the government's role.
8. He threatened those who exclude immigrants and do not help the poor
Conflating immigrants with poor is yet another typical leftist claptrap. Nowhere does the Bible say we have to accept immigrants. If you read the Old Testament it talks about sojourners or those already present in the land and that while they are in Israel they are to be treated as they would teat each other, but for them to be able to live in the land they would have to become Jews via various ceremonies, and not just show up and expect to be part of the nation, which is what we are seeing nowadays. The problem is that letting people who don't share your culture will destroy you from within, as we are seeing in Europe right now, with many immigrants refusing to integrate and are causing massive problems with a clash of culture
7. He told people to pay their taxes.
He also told those who collect taxes to be righteous with the taxes. There is a role for government to lay, but what we are saying tha government is too big and should be smaller.
6. Jesus was known for staging public protests at church.
I have no idea what he is going on with this one.
5. He often resorted to name calling when confronting the popular religious leaders of his day.
He would say these things to the liberal leaders, since he did that to those who were liberal with the scriptures. Obviously this guy doesn't understand what he is saying.
4. Jesus would be viewed as anti-death penalty and soft on crime.
Facepalm. This is twisted logic at it's worse. Jesus came not to earth to condemn people but to save them from his sins, but Jesus did willing allow himself to be executed via the death penalty as a payment for our sins. This just shows how poorly this guy thinks.
3. Jesus’ absurd teaching on enemy love would be seen as a threat to national defense.
Yet again conflating personal commands with national. Turning the other cheek is an act of defiance not of submission. Far too often people twist the meaning of Jesus' words out of their context into what they want it to be.
2. Jesus rebuked those who were into concealed carry.
This author misses the point that Jesus didn't need to be defended since he knew he was going to be a sacrifice. Peter's heart was in the wrong place at that time, but this has nothing to do with what the author wants it to be about. More liberal gibberish about taking modern issues into an ancient context, when they aren't related.
1. Instead of “American Exceptionalism” Jesus would spend his campaign talking about a place that is WAY better than America.
What is the point of this? This is pointless since Jesus had nothing to do with America, since it was not founded in his time, but Jesus' life was not about the political but about his goal on earth, which was to fulfil the desires of the Father, which was his payment for our sins. But I love such commentary since it says more about them than it does about Jesus.
