RandyPNW
Well-Known Member
- Jun 8, 2021
- 2,391
- 519
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Dan 7 talks about the pompous one who is persecuting and prevailing over the saints for a time times and half a time. Now the the gates of hell do not prevail over the church and the 70 weeks of Daniels are clearly set for the city of Jerusalem noted as the Holy City and the Jews noted at Daniels people.
I can't argue this point because it is predicated on belief that Daniel's 70th Week plays a role in this. I don't believe it does. What we are told about Jerusalem, however, is that it will suffer oppression from external pagan peoples until the end of the age, when Christ returns.
The dispensational view has the church gone and the focus back on Israel. Luke one ties this in as well with the prophecy of Zachariah noting that Jesus would be the horn of salvation for the house of Jacob and would keep the covenants, oaths, promises and prophecies to deliver them from their enemies and to enter a time where from then on they would worship and serve the LORD in righteousness and holiness without fear and dwell in safety all their days.
I agree with Dispensationalism in regard to Israel's national restoration and acceptance of Christ at his Coming. I just don't believe this supposed "return to Israel" begins at a Pretrib Rapture.
The Dispensational view has a Secret Rapture of the Church, turning focus back to Israel. And then Israel is refined to accept Christ at his 2nd Coming. I don't believe there is any basis for such a belief except that indeed, Israel will be restored at the 2nd Coming. No Pretrib Rapture.
This is the focus of the tribulation to accomplish this transition. The same with Isaiah 61 where Jesus read half the 1st sentence up until the declaring of the acceptable year of the LORD and he stopped and declared that fulfilled. The rest of the sentence and chapter are all the things accomplished in the day of vengeance of our God. Again this is a clear before and after picture for Zion and support the idea that the 70th week of Daniel is focused on the outcome for Daniels people and Zion.
Again, I don't believe the 70th Week of Daniel plays a role in this. I used to believe that, but no longer. It was, I believe, fulfilled at Christ's 1st Coming, followed by the beginning of a long age of Jewish Punishment. This long age of Jewish Punishment is, I believe, the "Great Tribulation" spoken of by Jesus. It is not the Reign of Antichrist, as is often thought.
Obviously, the Jewish Punishment of the present age, the "Jewish Diaspora," will not end until the 2nd Coming. So during Antichrist's Reign, this Jewish Punishment will continue, until Israel is purged of those opposing the Coming of Christ.
The many who convert post rapture will be the ones who's souls are under the altar crying out for justice and the that number will be completed. The rapture has the saints meeting the dead in Christ in the air called to Jesus and the distinction of this is Jesus is coming for the bride and not coming in vengeance. The contrast to him coming to tread the winepress of the wrath of God is when He comes from Bozrah and all His garments are stained in blood and in that day His feet will touch the Mount of Olives which will split in two and then He will be king over all the earth.
I see no distinction in Scriptures between Jesus' Coming in Vengeance and his Coming to deliver his Church. So I'm not going to "read these distinctions into" the various passages, when they are not explicitly there.
The promise to keep the church of Philedelphia from the hour that is coming to test all those who dwell on the earth is linked to the prayer Jesus told us to pray that we would be counted worthy to escape these things that are coming upon the whole earth and to be standing before the son of man.
I've heard this argument for many years, and I find it a very poor argument in some respects. At best, this proves that at times God wishes Christians to escape judgments meant only for unbelievers. This was true in 70 AD and this was true with the Christians at Philadelphia.
But the only escape Christians are assured they will escape from is the judgment of Hell. We are specifically told we are not guaranteed an escape from tribulation in the world. And there have been many martyrs who have died in tribulation, and did not escape.
There have also been many Christian casualties in natural disasters and wars caused by unbelievers. But we live in the same world with unbelievers, and share in their suffering, much as Christ shared in the suffering brought on in the world by sinful Man.
The church is not mentioned in Rev after chapter 3 and I do agree with you the 144K are not evangelists as many say but the gospel is said to be proclaimed at that time by Then I saw another angel flying in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach to those who dwell on the earth—to every nation, tribe, tongue, and people—
I think the church is gone and those beheaded are tribulation saints and not the church.
For one thing, I do not assume the 70th Week of Daniel is involved--no 7 year period--only a short 3.5 year period. And that is very, very short! No time for evangelism, and who can work when the "night" has come?
The evangelism brought by angels are different from human missionary activity, and largely has to do with God speaking to the human conscience generally. It is a warning to consciences of men that judgment is coming against their choice to commit terrible evils.
I am aware of what signs would prove this view wrong and am committed to stand in Christ no matter what. I appreciate your invitation to share my views and hope we enjoy the same application to be laboring for the kingdom.
Of course, future prophecy isn't really for speculation, but neither is there anything wrong with speculating about it. The more we focus on future prophecy, the more we will pay attention to its lessons. Thanks for sharing!
Upvote
0