Gentlemen,
I'll be honest here and say that I don't want to argue with either of you about the points I have asserted (as it almost always turns nasty and that's not what I was going for) so I will not go any further in evidentiary matters in this thread (as you said Vance, it's not the place).
I also don't want to get too far away from my original point, which is that I am doubtful of both sides. The problem I have is that although science is
supposed to be objective, it will always be subjective simply because it's a human concept. Everyone has a point of view and that individual perspective will always leak into other areas, even those that are supposed to be exclusive of them, simply because we're human and that's what human beings do. Is it conscious? No. But it is inevitable because it's our nature.
Also scientists in general don't always convey results that are contrary to their point of view. It is rare indeed to see a study published that contradicts the hypothesis presented (and the few that do are almost always presented in a manner that makes it seem like a success...that's partly why there are always very heated debates within the scientific community itself). Why is that? Because results that don't jibe with the idea are considered failures. Not too many people publicly proclaim their "failures". This goes for scientists on both sides of the debate.
Now aside from physical evidence, I have a few logical/theological problems with evolutionary theory that maybe you guys can help me with, since you both seem to have a pretty good handle on the origins debate. I realize that a strictly literal interpretation currently appears to contradict geological findings about the Earth's age, etc. Personally, I think there certainly could have been, and most likely were other humans during the age of Adam and Eve. I see Genesis, and the Old Testament as a tracking of Christ's geneology.
But my problem is this: if God is who we believe He is (loving, caring, personal, etc.) I have a hard time believing that He would leave human creation to
random natural processes (which is the basis of Darwinist evolution). I certainly don't doubt He
COULD do it, but it seems very impersonal. That doesn't fit, in my head at least, with the God of the Bible, who has His hand in everything, who loves His creatures so much He sacrificed His Son for us. I'm not baiting you guys here. I genuinely want to know from people who firmly believe in both creation and evolution, how do you reconcile
random micro-mutation with a loving God???
OK, so I did stray a bit.
My curiosity got the better of me.
Thanks again for your thoughtful input,
=) Mandy