Trump is accused of influencing campaign, but money was spent after the election?!

[discombobulated1]

This week could be a turning point in the election: Marc Thiessen | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley analyzes Day 8 of the NY v. Trump case and the ‘Outnumbered’ panel discuss the political implications of the trial.

www.foxnews.com

Did I get that right? In this commentary by attorneys and Thiessen, it seems to say that Trump could not possibly have been trying to sway an election because the election (2016) was over (2017).

I'll try to find it, it's at the end of the video.

I've been watching this case a lot, though and not only is there no crime mentioned by the prosecutor, but Bragg doesn't have the ability to prosecute outside his jurisdiction anyway...

And the statute of limitations has run out on the potential misdemeanor charges-- all of them!

I just cannot believe what is happening here.

Ok, it's at point 6.40 in the video

 

[AlexB23]

This week could be a turning point in the election: Marc Thiessen | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley analyzes Day 8 of the NY v. Trump case and the ‘Outnumbered’ panel discuss the political implications of the trial.

www.foxnews.com

Did I get that right? In this commentary by attorneys and Thiessen, it seems to say that Trump could not possibly have been trying to sway an election because the election (2016) was over (2017).

I'll try to find it, it's at the end of the video.

I've been watching this case a lot, though and not only is there no crime mentioned by the prosecutor, but Bragg doesn't have the ability to prosecute outside his jurisdiction anyway...

And the statute of limitations has run out on the potential misdemeanor charges-- all of them!

I just cannot believe what is happening here.

Ok, it's at point 6.40 in the video

Hey, can you post this from an article such as AP or Reuters?

 

[discombobulated1]

Hey, can you post this from an article such as AP or Reuters?

No, I have a brain and watch news I trust.

kind of makes sense

But I understand your apparent need to be one of the popular ones who disparage Fox all the time. It's a fad. And you wouldn't want to be out of style, right?

 

[AlexB23]

No, I have a brain and watch news I trust.

kind of makes sense

But I understand your apparent need to be one of the popular ones who disparage Fox all the time. It's a fad. And you wouldn't want to be out of style, right?

Well, this graph explains it all. Seems that our news is polarized in this country. At least ABC is popular amongst both parties.

5 facts about Fox News

While U.S. Democrats turn to a variety of outlets for political news, no source comes close to matching the appeal of Fox News for Republicans.

www.pewresearch.org

 

[discombobulated1]

Well, this graph explains it all. Seems that our news is polarized in this country. At least ABC is popular amongst both parties.

5 facts about Fox News

While U.S. Democrats turn to a variety of outlets for political news, no source comes close to matching the appeal of Fox News for Republicans.

www.pewresearch.org

I don't see how that addresses one thing I said but oh well.

 

[AlexB23]

I don't see how that addresses one thing I said but oh well.

Well, pretty much anyone in the center of the political spectrum (neither for Biden or Trump) would agree that CNN and Fox are not based in truth.

 

[discombobulated1]

Well, pretty much anyone in the center of the political spectrum (neither for Biden or Trump) would agree that CNN and Fox are not based in truth.

That's what someone told you, someone with a political ax to grind.

Again, you look @ all those people who show up on fox as guests. They are all lying through their teeth because, what... they know they will get away with it?

CNN has been sued for lying, more than once. Fox had some kind of legal issue a couple years ago and I can't speak on it but I can speak on CNN being accused of lying, one lawsuit was a whopper: millions.

And i don't think the legal issues Fox had a couple years ago had much to do with lying. Then again, I haven't studied up on that one. The thing is that when all guests say the same thing, present the same facts and information, I mean REALLY? And then there all the videos we are shown.. illegals crossing by the thousands into our country, etc..

But all these people are in some kind of grand conspiracy to lie?

That is SO incredibly illogical. No one believes that.

 

[AlexB23]

That's what someone told you, someone with a political ax to grind.

Again, you look @ all those people who show up on fox as guests. They are all lying through their teeth because, what... they know they will get away with it?

CNN has been sued for lying, more than once. Fox had some kind of legal issue a couple years ago and I can't speak on it but I can speak on CNN being accused of lying, one lawsuit was a whopper: millions.

And i don't think the legal issues Fox had a couple years ago had much to do with lying. Then again, I haven't studied up on that one. The thing is that when all guests say the same thing, present the same facts and information, I mean REALLY? They are all in a conspiracy to lie?

That is just SO incredibly UNLIKELY. No one believes that.

Well, most large media companies spin stuff. The two-party system is the devil trying to divide our country, same with CNN and Fox.

 

[BobRyan]

This week could be a turning point in the election: Marc Thiessen | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley analyzes Day 8 of the NY v. Trump case and the ‘Outnumbered’ panel discuss the political implications of the trial.

www.foxnews.com

Did I get that right? In this commentary by attorneys and Thiessen, it seems to say that Trump could not possibly have been trying to sway an election because the election (2016) was over (2017).

Indeed - they can't claim election interference in the 2016 election based on payments for investigations that were made in 2017-- see the 6:40 point in the video

 

[Arcangl86]

This week could be a turning point in the election: Marc Thiessen | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley analyzes Day 8 of the NY v. Trump case and the ‘Outnumbered’ panel discuss the political implications of the trial.

www.foxnews.com

Did I get that right? In this commentary by attorneys and Thiessen, it seems to say that Trump could not possibly have been trying to sway an election because the election (2016) was over (2017).

I'll try to find it, it's at the end of the video.

I've been watching this case a lot, though and not only is there no crime mentioned by the prosecutor, but Bragg doesn't have the ability to prosecute outside his jurisdiction anyway...

And the statute of limitations has run out on the potential misdemeanor charges-- all of them!

I just cannot believe what is happening here.

Ok, it's at point 6.40 in the video

He isn't on trial for campaign finance violations. He's on trial for altering business records in an attempt to hide the campaign finance violations. It's a subtle distinction, but it's a valid one under NY law.

 

[discombobulated1]

Well, most large media companies spin stuff. The two-party system is the devil trying to divide our country, same with CNN and Fox.

the parties are not in cahoots (at least not all the time) trying to divide our country. We are divided because the leftis are EXTREMISTS and do not honor God's laws, whereas the conservatives do. Of course there will be division and there SHOULD be. Division is a word that gets a bad name but Jesus told us we would have division. He said that the father will be against his son, the daughter against her mother and etc... and that His follower would be "hated by all" because of Him. If a person can't stand being hated by all in society, he should not become a Christian. She will not be able to finish the Race.

 

[discombobulated1]

He isn't on trial for campaign finance violations. He's on trial for altering business records in an attempt to hide the campaign finance violations. It's a subtle distinction, but it's a valid one under NY law.

I don't see much of a distinction, if any.

Well, yeh, trying to cover up a crime is different than the crime itself. The thing is, I don't think Trump kept his own business records or accounting. Yes, I know, he told others to do this or that, presumably.

Well, I wish I had time to explore these issues thoroughly, but I just don't think the Lord wants me to get into the minutiae any more than I already do. I believe He may have other things for me to do?

 

[discombobulated1]

Indeed - they can't claim election interference in the 2016 election based on payments for investigations that were made in 2017-- see the 6:40 point in the video

yeh, I already posted where that info is

6:40

to me, they do not have a case at all. I know the case has not been dismissed because of

2 words

Alvin Bragg

 

[discombobulated1]

Well, pretty much anyone in the center of the political spectrum (neither for Biden or Trump) would agree that CNN and Fox are not based in truth.

I find massive truth at Fox.

they quote FACTS that even CNN states. And there are other stations also.

Fox is NOT lying. IF they were, I am a great lie detector and would have stopped watching a decade or more ago.

 

[AlexB23]

I find massive truth at Fox.

they quote FACTS that even CNN states. And there are other stations also.

Fox is NOT lying. IF they were, I am a great lie detector and would have stopped watching a decade or more ago.

We can agree to disagree on Fox, but hey, at least we both agree that abortions are a sin/not Godly, and that the trans movement is worldly.

 

[discombobulated1]

We can agree to disagree on Fox, but hey, at least we both agree that abortions are a sin/not Godly, and that the trans movement is worldly.

forcing a child to listen to a bunch of nonsense about how they can choose their own gender and trying to talk the child into undergoing surgery to change it

is child abuse