Using AI to further debunk ancient Egyptians used technologies to drill granite far beyond the current level.

[Hans Blaster]

Seeing as geometry was originally developed by humans to objectively describe what we mean whenever we use the term 'nature', the notion of it being 'found in nature' is completely nonsensical double-talk.

I guess that's what @Hans Blaster means by 'you're killing' him .. and I'll add to that by saying that you're also 'killing me'!
But why?

Do I need to put "sarcasm" tags in my post? The "tiny jugs with their own handles" was kind of a give away. If that didn't do the trick, I spoke of going smaller than fundamental particles... (Charge radius, as best we know the electron has no actual dimensions or structure.)

 

[SelfSim]

Do I need to put "sarcasm" tags in my post? The "tiny jugs with their own handles" was kind of a give away. If that didn't do the trick, I spoke of going smaller than fundamental particles... (Charge radius, as best we know the electron has no actual dimensions or structure.)

Ah .. ok.
That, first and foremost. (Its so obvious I must've skipped over it in my mind).
Cheers

 

[sjastro]

"Maybe not the electron but who knows. If this natural geometry is found in nature then maybe it does go down to the electron lol."

This nonsense has led to another AI challenge describing the electron orbitals for the hydrogen atom in particular the 2s, 2p and 3d orbitals.
At first GPT-4o struggled with the code until I gave it a few hints using the solution of Schrodinger's equation involving associated Laguerre polynomials and spherical harmonics.

What surprised me was it was able to produce the code from the mathematics indicating it has access to some extensive mathematical libraries.
It's response went far beyond what I expected which included probability densities and required the orbitals to be featured as cross sections through the x-y plane where z = 0.

These are in agreement with textbook illustrations.

The Python code.

Explanation of code next post.

 

[sjastro]

Explanation of code by GPT-4o in terms of Quantum theory.

 

[SelfSim]

"Maybe not the electron but who knows. If this natural geometry is found in nature then maybe it does go down to the electron lol."

This nonsense has led to another AI challenge describing the electron orbitals for the hydrogen atom in particular the 2s, 2p and 3d orbitals.
At first GPT-4o struggled with the code until I gave it a few hints using the solution of Schrodinger's equation involving associated Laguerre polynomials and spherical harmonics.

What surprised me was it was able to produce the code from the mathematics indicating it has access to some extensive mathematical libraries.
It's response went far beyond what I expected which included probability densities and required the orbitals to be featured as cross sections through the x-y plane where z = 0.

View attachment 359122​

These are in agreement with textbook illustrations.

The Python code.

View attachment 359123​

Explanation of code next post.

Ok so can someone explain what: 'lug handles were perfectly aligned with the rest of the vase down to the micron level. So yes the precision is down to the micron level' .. has to do with the 2s, 2p and 3d electron orbitals in hydrogen?

 

[sjastro]

Ok so can someone explain what: 'lug handles were perfectly aligned with the rest of the vase down to the micron level. So yes the precision is down to the micron level' .. has to do with the 2s, 2p and 3d electron orbitals in hydrogen?

You will have to ask the Dunning Kruger candidate in this thread who suggested natural geometry might go down to the electron level.....

 

[SelfSim]

You will have to ask the Dunning Kruger candidate in this thread who suggested natural geometry might go down to the electron level.....

Apologies for appearing to be asking you there .. 'twasn't meant to be a question for you. (It should've been a stand alone post).
Cheers