DAY OF CHRIST THE DAY OF CHRIST -
Since Christians will be raptured before the beginning of the tribulation, we who are alive during the church age will not see the Antichrist’s rise to power. It is possible that we will see him on the world stage, but we will not recognize him as the beast, because he will not yet have made his move toward world domination.
The fact that the Antichrist is not revealed until after the rapture is taught in 2 Thessalonians 2. Speaking of the Day of the Lord, Paul writes that the tribulation will not begin until after the Antichrist is already revealed: “That day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God” (verses 3–4). Also, the revelation of the Antichrist must come after something else, because right now there is something “holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time. For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way. And then the lawless one will be revealed” (verses 6–8). We believe this One who “holds back” the Antichrist is none other than the Holy Spirit. When the restraining influence of the Spirit is removed from this world—along with the church that the Spirit indwells—then the Antichrist will have free rein.
Will Christians see the Antichrist? No, at least not in his role as described in Revelation. The removal of the Restrainer’s influence precedes the revealing of the Antichrist. Evil is hindered right now, but, once the church age ends, the obstruction will be gone, and the rebellion will have the upper hand, at least temporarily. At the end of the tribulation, “the Lord Jesus will overthrow [the Antichrist] with the breath of his mouth and destroy [him] by the splendor of his coming” (2 Thessalonians 2:8). The ultimate doom of evil is sure.
We should note that there will be people who come to faith in Christ during the tribulation period. Many of these people will be Jews who believe in Jesus (Revelation 7). These believers will not only see the Antichrist but endure severe persecution because of him. These tribulation saints will either die during the tribulation or live to see the second coming of Jesus Christ (Revelation 19).
The phrase “day of Christ” occurs three times in the Bible (Philippians 1:10, 2:16; 2 Thessalonians 2:2). Its occurrence in the epistle to the Philippians most definitely refers to the Rapture and/or the Judgment Seat of Christ. Similar phrases like “day of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 1:8), “day of the Lord Jesus” (1 Corinthians 5:5; 2 Corinthians 1:14), and “the day” (1 Corinthians 3:13) refer to the Judgment Seat of Christ as well. Likewise, it is clear that the phrase “day of Jesus Christ” (Philippians 1:6) points to the Judgment Seat of Christ and not the Second Advent as in the day of the Lord. However, when reading 2 Thessalonians 2:2, it is apparent that there must be more to “the day of Christ” than meets the eye. Here is the verse in its context:
NOW we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. (2 Thessalonians 2:1–6)
Classic dispensationalists from Scofield to Ironside claimed that the reading “day of Christ” in 2 Thessalonians 2 was “a faulty translation.” 75 Bible believers recognize this claim as typical Alexandrian tampering. A simple look at the Nestle-Aland critical apparatus reveals that “the day of Christ” was not a “mistranslation” at all! 76 It was a legitimate translation of Christos (Christ) from the Majority text – which is the Byzantine or Syrian type text. Modern Bible versions read “the day of the Lord” because they are based on corrupt manuscripts that insert kurios (Lord) for Christos (Christ). 77
The phrase “day of Christ” in 2 Thessalonians is the correct and accurate phrase, but there are a few variations as to its meaning. The first view defines “the day of Christ” in 2 Thessalonians like it is elsewhere defined in scripture, referring to the Rapture and the Judgment Seat of Christ, and from this option, there are a few alternative teachings. The second view is that “the day of Christ” is used in 2 Thessalonians 2 synonymously with “the day of the Lord.”
DAY OF CHRIST VIEW 1= THE RAPTURE
The first teaching from the belief that “the day of Christ” is the Rapture proposes that “Christ will not come until the revelation of the Man of Sin.” 78 This teaching differs from the typical teaching that the Rapture is imminent, but does agree that “the only scripturally sound doctrinal position for the Bible believer is a pre-tribulation rapture of the body of Christ.” 79 This understanding “does not take our eyes off the anticipated and expected event of the rapture,” 80 but it does teach by default that two things must come before the Rapture: “a falling away” and the revelation of “that man of sin.” The fact that John is a type of the church and “has the antichrist revealed to him before he begins his work” 81 (referring to John knowing about Judas as the betrayer – John 13:35–36) is used as proof to substantiate the prelude of the Antichrist being revealed before the Rapture.
The second teaching from the belief that “the day of Christ” is the Rapture maintains that the Antichrist “was revealed at the First Advent so the comma after the word ‘first’ separates the rest of verse 3 from the Second Coming in verses 1–2.” 82 Those who believe this teaching hold to the fact that both the Rapture (“our gathering together unto him”) and the Second Advent (“the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ…destroy with the brightness of his coming”) are within the context of the passage. Therefore “a falling away first” will begin before the Rapture, and “that man of sin” will “be revealed” before the Second Advent. 83
DAY OF CHRIST VIEW 2 = THE DAY OF THE LORD
The more likely option is the second view, that the phrase “the day of Christ” actually refers to “the day of the Lord,” because “the ‘day of the Lord’ overlaps the end of the Church Age and the beginning of the Millennium.” 84 This view takes into consideration four factors: the motive behind the corruption found in Alexandrian Greek manuscripts, advanced revelation in the King James’ italics, Paul’s purpose for writing this chapter, and the fact that the revelation of the man of sin is synonymous with the Abomination of Desolation.
The change by corrupt manuscripts of “the day of Christ” to “the day of the Lord” erases the obvious truth that “the word ‘Christ’ was inserted to confirm His Deity.” 85 Jesus Christ of the New Testament is and will be the LORD of the day of the LORD mentioned so often in the Old Testament. This substitution of “Christ” for “LORD” is similar to the substitution of “Holy Ghost” for “LORD” in the New Testament phrase, “Thus saith the Holy Ghost” (Acts 21:11), a verse proving the deity of the Holy Spirit.
The revelation found with the italicized words, “that day shall not come, ” gives further credence that “the day of Christ” can have reference to the day of the Lord. Italicized words in the Bible draw your attention to them, and often reveal advanced truth. For example, in John 18:5, the italicized “he” points to the fact that Jesus is the “I am” of the Old Testament. Most new versions read “I am he” without the italics, thus losing the emphasis. In 2 Thessalonians, with the words “that day” italicized, it is even more clear that they were added to highlight the antecedent “day of Christ.” Additionally, the phrase “that day” is actually connected “to four days: the Judgment Seat of Christ (1 Cor. 3), the Battle of Armageddon…the Millennium, and the First Advent.” 86 Since “that day” often refers to the Second Advent (Isaiah 2:11, 17, 11:10–11, 17:14, 26:1, 27:1; 1 Thessalonians 5:4; 2 Timothy 1:12, 18, 4:8, etc.), it opens up the possibility of “the day of Christ” referring to the Second Advent as well.
Next, the motive of Paul writing to the Thessalonians in this second letter should be considered. If “the day of Christ” is the Rapture, why would the fact of it being “at hand” trouble them and shake them up? For something to be “at hand” means that it is very close and pending (Genesis 27:41; Isaiah 13:6; Joel 1:15, 2:1; Matthew 3:2, 4:17; Mark 14:42; John 2:13). Why would Paul not want them thinking the Rapture was “at hand” when he had previously told them it was something to look forward to, not something to be frightened of? He said, “Comfort one another with these words” (1 Thessalonians 4:18). On the other hand, if “that day” and “the day of Christ” refer to the Second Advent, then Paul’s message is addressing their mistaken fear that they were about to be recipients of God’s judgment and wrath – something he had previously taught them was impossible (1 Thessalonians 5:9). Whatever false rumors or letters they had received were undoubtedly teaching that “the first resurrection was SPIRITUAL, so they have missed it.” 87 This heretical teaching was taught by “Hymenaeus and Alexander” (1 Timothy 1:20; 2 Timothy 2:17), and was connected to spreading the idea that the Second Advent was “at hand.” You can see why believers would be upset if they were following that teaching. It would imply they were about to fall under God’s wrath. Paul had previously clarified that they “should suffer tribulation” (1 Thessalonians 3:4), but he never taught they would be in the last half of Daniel’s Seventieth Week, called “a time of trouble” (Daniel 12:1) and the “great tribulation” (Matthew 24:21; Revelation 2:22, 7:14). Instead, he encouraged, assured, and comforted them (1 Thessalonians 4:18, 5:9).
Finally, it seems clear from the context as well as comparing scripture, that the timing when “that man of sin be revealed” is when “he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.” So the revealing of “that man of sin” is not the church receiving a revelation, but rather the Antichrist being revealed to the world! Granted, the word “revealed” can be used in other contexts to mean knowledge (see Matthew 16:17; Luke 2:26, etc.), but in this instance, it is just not the case. The wording and context in 2 Thessalonians does not use the word “revealed” in this way (see 2 Thessalonians 1:7, 2:8). The Antichrist is not uncovered by some secret revelation by the church. If this revelation is simply knowledge as to who the Antichrist is, then we already know who he is. He is Judas Iscariot, because Judas was “a devil” (John 6:70), went “to his own place” after he died (Acts 1:25), and was identified by Christ as “the son of perdition” (John 17:12). The Antichrist is not only identified by name and title, but by the English acronym “sop” (John 13:26–30) or “son of Perdition.” He is “the beast that was, and is not, and yet is” (Revelation 17:8).
Proof that the church must be gone prior to “the abomination of desolation” (Matthew 24:15) is evident by two things: First, during the time preceding “the abomination of desolation” the “gospel of the kingdom” (Matthew 24:14) will “be preached in all the world, ” not the “gospel of the grace of God” (Acts 20:24). A different dispensation will be in place during the time when the Antichrist goes into the temple. Secondly, Judas was never alive on the earth during the Church Age. He “went and hanged himself” (Matthew 27:5) prior to Jesus Christ being “hanged on a tree” (Acts 5:30). When the “one body” of Jesus Christ began at “the cross” (Ephesians 2:16– 17), Judas was already dead. The ministry of the “son of perdition” will last 1260 days and concerns “the time of Jacob’s trouble” (Jeremiah 30:7) because he will be the “idol shepherd” (Zechariah 11:7) to the nation of Israel, not the church! The body of Christ is not to anticipate “his time” but “high time” when “the Lord is at hand” (Philippians 4:5). Judas will show back up on the earth after the body of Christ has made an exodus!
So, in summary, “the day of Christ” may only refer to the Rapture and the Judgment Seat of Christ. If this is the case, then there are two possibilities with regard to 2 Thessalonians 2. The first concedes that the church will see “a falling away first” before the Rapture. The second suggests that the church will see both “a falling away” and the Antichrist before the Rapture. Both positions are clear that the church “will be caught up before the tribulation can begin.” 88 The other view holds that “the day of Christ” is an overlap from “the day of the Lord” and Paul “calls it ‘the day of Christ’ because ‘that day,’ for them, will begin with the Rapture (1 Thess. 4), not the Advent,” 89 and the church will not see the Antichrist prior to the Rapture. — with Dennis P. Grant and 2 others.