• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

The political elite ... an answer to a recurring question

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟826,037.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
The Growing Tyranny of the Political Elite | American Thinker

A small cadre of elite administrators, czars, judges, or politicians -- often just one person -- thinks it (or he or she) has the right to decide what's best for 320 million Americans.
...
Heibroner's books popularized the liberal premise that the political elite has the right and obligation to make fundamental decisions on behalf of the mass of citizens. In doing so, Heilbroner understood, the elite must find ways to subvert the naturally conservative inclinations of the people -- especially those lumpen-headed businessmen whom Heilbroner so despised. Decision-making must be shifted from individuals and elected representatives to bureaucrats and judges appointed by leftist politicians. Public opinion must be shaped and molded by elitist academics and journalists. The will of the state must be imposed, by violence if necessary. This was the future of America, according to Robert L. Heilbroner, and it is the vision of America adopted by those young activists in the 1960s and 1970s who now constitute the leadership of the Democratic Party.

Heilbroner believed that it would take hundreds of years to overturn democracy in America, in part because of the nation's widespread support of capitalism and the country's pesky tradition of individual rights. He noted, however, that the process could be speeded up in the event of a severe economic crisis. Another great national depression or prolonged recession would make it possible for government to enact a series of "reforms" that would shift control from the private sector to government. Government would then control not just major sectors of the economy, but the personal lives of all citizens. Their incomes, their health care, their educations, their home mortgages, their communications and entertainment, their access to news and information would all fall under the control of the political elite. At that point, Heilbroner believed, utopia would be at hand.
...
Fortunately, Americans are becoming more aware of the concentration of power within the new political elite and more skeptical of the elite's ability to govern.
Though the American Thinker restricts the usage of 'political elite' to Democrats ... the problem is obviously and profoundly manifested in both political parties and throughout the capitol.
 

stamperben

It's an old family tradition
Oct 16, 2011
14,551
4,079
✟61,194.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
And who controls that "small cadre of elite administrators, czars, judges, or politicians -- often just one person -- thinks it (or he or she) has the right to decide what's best for 320 million Americans."? Who holds power? Since speech is power, and now money has been defined as speech, who is it that has the money? Nearly one billion dollars by one set of brothers who freely admit it is to "influence" elections, millions of dollars given to candidates by a casino magnate, enormous amounts of money that the average American can't even truly contemplate going to elections; so tell us, who is it that are the actual elites?

I hold that it is that very small cadre of billionaires who are the true elite who call the shots that their administrators, judges and politicians carry out. Those at the American Thinker did not think this out obviously. But I wouldn't expect them to, they might lose their support.
 
Upvote 0

Sistrin

We are such stuff as dreams are made on...
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2012
6,488
3,399
Location Location Location
✟197,980.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's fine, add Soros. Just be honest about who these elites are.

Look up David Brock and his current efforts on behalf of Hillary.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,004
28,556
Baltimore
✟702,708.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Let's not forget that George Soros spent far more than the Kochs

No, he didn't.

... and started years earlier.

The Kochs are neophytes in comparison.

Lol, what?

Charles Koch helped found the Cato Institute in 1977 and David was the Libertarian Party VP nominee in 1980. Soros wasn't very active in the US until the early 2000's.
 
Upvote 0

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟826,037.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
No, he didn't.

Lol, what?

Charles Koch helped found the Cato Institute in 1977 and David was the Libertarian Party VP nominee in 1980. Soros wasn't very active in the US until the early 2000's.
LOL, if you want to believe they've been competing in the same league as Soros for longer than Soros ... then they've been horribly ineffective during that time.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,004
28,556
Baltimore
✟702,708.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
LOL, if you want to believe they've been competing in the same league as Soros for longer than Soros ... then they've been horribly ineffective during that time.

How have they been ineffective? Their policy ideals are held by most of the middle of the country and they've got a significant chunk of federal-level Republicans doing their bidding. They've succeeded in shifting the entire political perspective in this country towards the right.
 
Upvote 0

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟826,037.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
How have they been ineffective? Their policy ideals are held by most of the middle of the country and they've got a significant chunk of federal-level Republicans doing their bidding. They've succeeded in shifting the entire political perspective in this country towards the right.
But the TEA party's dead.
Winking_smiley.gif


Long live the TEA party.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,004
28,556
Baltimore
✟702,708.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
But the TEA party's dead.
Winking_smiley.gif


Long live the TEA party.

idk why people say that the Tea Party's dead. I neither think it's dead nor think that it's a relatively new movement. The Tea Party is just a popularization of the same sort of things that Rush Limbaugh et al have been preaching for 25 years. It only took this long to gain widespread popularity, because notmany people can listen to the radio during the middle of the day, and it took a while for cable tv political punditry to gain enough market penetration to make the movement successful. I think their influence may wane over the next couple years, as people learn just how crotchety, misguided, and ill-informed it all really is, but it's not going to do away.
 
Upvote 0

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟826,037.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
idk why people say that the Tea Party's dead. I neither think it's dead nor think that it's a relatively new movement. The Tea Party is just a popularization of the same sort of things that Rush Limbaugh et al have been preaching for 25 years. It only took this long to gain widespread popularity, because notmany people can listen to the radio during the middle of the day, and it took a while for cable tv political punditry to gain enough market penetration to make the movement successful. I think their influence may wane over the next couple years, as people learn just how crotchety, misguided, and ill-informed it all really is, but it's not going to do away.
Nah ... Rush Limbaugh merely gave it voice. He had barely started his national radio program when Ross Perot took the country by storm.

13dd621f7593140cbb4191818c36935d.jpg
 
Upvote 0