• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

the evolving brain vs the created brain

Status
Not open for further replies.

: D

Active Member
Nov 12, 2015
183
17
south coast UK
✟15,465.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
not sure if this is the correct part of the forum or if I am going about it the right way due to not being around these parts for long.

I propose a debate with anyone who would like to support the case for an evolving brain,
flexibility on a "historical" starting point is fine with me,
as are both organic and psychological citations.

I would also propose a layman's description of evidence along side the offered evidence so as not to lose the casual observers interest or understanding.

finally due to the vastness and complexity of the subject I am happy to split between the organic and psychological areas (for example best of three on each and then best of three including both),
or a longer debate involving both areas (for example best of five).

this would make a hugely fascinating debate in my opinion,

(what happens now ?)
 

Dr GS Hurd

Newbie
Feb 14, 2014
577
257
Visit site
✟26,009.00
Faith
Taoist
Marital Status
Private
There are several reasons that I would not pursue your proposal. I'll review them as they might help you to focus your ideas.

The first issue that I see is that there is an open question of the idea, even the existence, of consciousness. Is there anything beyond "remembering that we remember?" This leads rather quickly to René Descartes "mind brain" duality.

Is that your topic?

If consciousness exists, which seems likely naively, what are the constraints on it. Is there free will?

Is that your topic?

Since we know that alterations, even mechanical alterations, of the brain alter perception and cognition, is there anything beyond a material "thinking machine?"

Is that your topic?

Language alters brain structure. Language is a historical accident. Language carries culture. Is that a historical accident?

Is that your topic?

And lastly, it is absurd to discuss this in "a layman's description of evidence along side the offered evidence" since I certainly do not propose to teach a graduate level course in K-12 language. Nor can I imagine starting with an undergraduate introduction.

Your question was interesting, but impractical for this setting.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.