What I find antagonizing is you young people say these things as if they are proven facts.
They are facts, as in "observations made so many time that it is ludicrous to treat them as anything other than fact". The constancy of the speed of light is as established as the existence of the Great Pyramids or the wetness of water.
But if any of us ever gain immortality you'll then learn time isn't a real thing.
That same argument could be used to ignore any fact, which is probably why creationists use the argument so often. Reality is a problem for them, so they need some made up excuse to ignore reality.
Would you say the same thing about a murder trial? If a defense attorney used the same argument, would you buy it?
"If the members of the jury will notice, if they were to gain immortality they would learn that just because the DNA, fingerprint, fiber, shoe print, and all of the other forensic evidence clearly matches my client, it doesn't mean that any of that evidence is trustworthy. Therefore, I ask that you find my client innocent because facts don't matter."
Upvote
0