My Alcohol Challenge

[Lost Angel]

So, one claims to drink beer, but then immediately claims, using the same word, not to not to know what it tastes like.

Sounds like deliberate deception to confuse the message.

In 1611, was wine considered a fermented drink?

In the easiest writings of the Jesus water to..., was the word defined as fermented or non fermented, or ambiguous?

 

[quatona]

Ya! How 'bout that!?

Well, either you consider Root Beer to be beer (in which case you do know what beer tastes like), or you don´t (in which case you haven´t been drinking beer).

 

[quatona]

I've drank beer before ... many times

Yet I don't know what beer tastes like.

Can you make sense of this?

The alcohol killed your last remaining brain cells?

 

[quatona]

121

Well, John 2:11 tells us that people get drunk from drinking wine. [Or else the argument to first serve the good wine, and later (when people are drunk anyway) serve the worse wine doesn´t make any sense at all).
But maybe their drunkenness was only embedded, or something.

 

[AV1611VET]

But maybe their drunkenness was only embedded, or something.

Or maybe the wine Jesus made was grape juice.

Joel 1:10 The field is wasted, the land mourneth; for the corn is wasted: the new wine is dried up, the oil languisheth.

Isaiah 65:8 Thus saith the LORD, As the new wine is found in the cluster, and one saith, Destroy it not; for a blessing is in it: so will I do for my servants' sakes, that I may not destroy them all.

Jeremiah 48:33 And joy and gladness is taken from the plentiful field, and from the land of Moab; and I have caused wine to fail from the winepresses: none shall tread with shouting; their shouting shall be no shouting.

 

[quatona]

Or maybe the wine Jesus made was grape juice.

Or maybe the wine Jesus made was WD40.

 

[AV1611VET]

Or maybe the wine Jesus made was WD40.

So it's either intoxicating wine or WD40?

Or maybe you're just playing games.

I'd hate to see what you compare lemon aid to.

 

[selfinflikted]

Ahem ... um ... 19

Something must be wrong on my end. It's just a blank post by you, showing on my screen.

 

[AV1611VET]

Something must be wrong on my end. It's just a blank post by you, showing on my screen.

It's an A&W root beer commercial from Youtube.

In other words, the challenge goes thusly:

I've drank [root] beer before ... many times.

Yet I don't know what [alcoholic] beer tastes like.

Can you make sense of this?

 

[selfinflikted]

It's an A&W root beer commercial from Youtube.

In other words, the challenge goes thusly:

Ah. YouTube is blocked from where I post. Makes sense now.

Also, root beer =/= beer, as has already been stated.

 

[quatona]

So it's either intoxicating wine or WD40?

Since people got drunk from it I concluded that there was alcohol in it. You ignored my argument, as well as the one in the other post.

Or maybe you're just playing games.

Since you ignore my actual arguments, what´s left than playing your game?

I'd hate to see what you compare lemon aid to.

Don´t forget that it was you who started the silly game.

 

[quatona]

It's an A&W root beer commercial from Youtube.

In other words, the challenge goes thusly:

No, that´s not how it went.

 

[AV1611VET]

Also, root beer =/= beer, as has already been stated.

And wine in John 2 ≠ Mogan David, as has already been denied.

 

[AV1611VET]

Since people got drunk from it I concluded that there was alcohol in it.

You were there too?

Don´t forget that it was you who started the silly game.

It's only "a silly game" to you because you can't see the parallel.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, that´s not how it went.

I said "goes" -- not "went".

I didn't write it that way, but the point goes that way.

You just can't see it.

 

[VirOptimus]

What does this have to do with physical and life sciences?

 

[quatona]

You were there too?

No, that was not my argument.

It's only "a silly game" to you because you can't see the parallel.

The game of using a word in two different meanings in one sentence in order to make your statement unintelligible? I can only find that in your OP.

 

[AV1611VET]

What does this have to do with physical and life sciences?

Nothing -- it's a semantic parallel to a miracle that took place in John 2.

Miracles ≠ Science

 

[VirOptimus]

Nothing -- it's a semantic parallel to a miracle that took place in John 2.

Miracles ≠ Science

Then why did you post it in this forum?

There is theology parts here on CF afterall, maybe you should ask a mod to move this thread there.

 

[quatona]

I said "goes" -- not "went".

So it´s a new "challenge"? I don´t even see how that´s a challenge.
It´s as much a challenge as "I know Paul Miller but I don´t know Paul Glaser".

I didn't write it that way, but the point goes that way.

So your OP statement was as pointless as it appeared to be, and one can´t make sense of it.
Your new "challenge" doesn´t make sense of it, it changes it completely.