You're the one misreading it. According to the context, "cannot do" obviously means NOT ALLOWED, but you make it out to mean "NOT ABLE." You're wrong.
re you also of the opinion that fig seeds can produce grapes ?
God's seed cannot bring forth liars, thieves, adulterers, or murderers.
You are obviously wrong here also, since the apostles wrote that 20 years after Jesus' resurrection. Their intention could not have possibly been to communicate to OT men, since it was the church age for 20 years.
Did I write anything about OT men ?
Gal 5 is written to a church, and to everyman born thereafter.
You aren't paying attention, it was clear. Your wrong ideas are sinful.
Please provide the sinful idea you are referencing.
Free from sin doesn't make one sinless. This has been told you many times with quotes from John, James, Paul, and others. Your unteachable attitude makes you a sinner.
I see.
So writing about freedom from sin make me a sinner.
Providing verses from the bible's writers saying differently won't impress you if you think they were all sinners.
But I must leave this one...“We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.” (1 John 5:18)
You're still not paying attention. You yourself said that you could commit sin. But sinless perfection means you cannot commit sin, so you contradict yourself.
I could commit a sin if I didn't want to obey God.
But that sin would manifest that I wasn't really born of God in the first place.
Just as apple seeds can only bear apples, God's seed can only bear after itself
Again, you're not paying attention, and this is your sin, that you assume wrong things and jump to wrong conclusions. Nowhere did I say or imply that you have to keep serving sin. But since you keep on accusing me of such things, it makes you an adversary and a false witness. So here clearly your sin is bearing false witness against your neighbor.
The entire thrust of your writings has been focused on the inability of man to obey God perfectly.
So knock off the posturing.
Of course it leads to righteousness. But you aren't paying attention.
How could it?
It is founded on the possibility that God's seed will bring forth liars and thieves.
The Spirit convicts the world of sin, this is how one gets an offended conscience. But the one dead in sin turns away, and the one born of God turns to God out of the hope within him. But of course you don't believe that.
I beleive it, but you seem not to.
I wanted righteousness, and God provided it in Christ Jesus...perfectly.
Already did several times, but you can't see it because you're blind.
Your accusations were based on false suppositions.
I get that you don't know what true faith is.
True faith will allow one to believe he can be sinless by the righteousness of Christ.
I asked a clear yes/no question which you evaded yet again: If I say "where sin abounds, grace much more abounds," and if I say "to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness," or if I say "the free grace of God means I am justified by faith alone, and salvation requires no work or effort from myself," do you believe that I am teaching antinomianism? Do you then believe that I am saying in effect, "let us do evil that good may come"? (this is a yes or no question)
I am not familiar with the defenders of sin's doctrines names.
I know that those doing evil are not in Christ, don't know God, can't say they have fellowship with God, and can't say they have no sin.
Those walking in the light-God, can say all those things truthfully.
And since you appear to be in this conversation just to quarrel, I'm done with you.
“Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:" (2 Peter 1:10)
.png)
