Just curious what you guys thought of Lordship Salvation compared to Free Grace. Which one you believe and why?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
As you probably already know I am Free Grace. I understand your contention that it is Antinomian but it really isn't. I do not hold that believers are under the Law in any way but I also do not hold that we will live like profligates after we are born from above. I have an extremely high view of the Law that makes it impossible for any but Christ to keep. I also have an extremely high view of the person and work of Christ. Free Grace teaches that all who know Christ will love Him and live by faith and walk in love to Him and His people. Where we differ with many who hold to Lordship salvation or the historical Reformed position is that believers are no longer under the Law in any way.When "Free Grace" is formulated such that it isn't Antinomian (strictly speaking, the belief that the Christian doesn't need to follow any commands; but more loosely, the belief in "carnal Christianity": the belief that people can be saved but live like the world with no change in character at all), it's not that different from Lordship Salvation. The problem is that so often it turns "sola fide" into a pretext for Antinomianism, which I regard as heretical. The belief that one can be saved and then live a life of obstinate rebellion towards God is unbiblical to say the least. But there are those in the no-lordship camp who still argue that the one who lives a life of unrepentant sin probably never were converted to begin with, which I take issue with, but which is certainly less problematic.
As you probably already know I am Free Grace. I understand your contention that it is Antinomian but it really isn't. I do not hold that believers are under the Law in any way but I also do not hold that we will live like profligates after we are born from above. I have an extremely high view of the Law that makes it impossible for any but Christ to keep. I also have an extremely high view of the person and work of Christ. Free Grace teaches that all who know Christ will love Him and live by faith and walk in love to Him and His people. Where we differ with many who hold to Lordship salvation or the historical Reformed position is that believers are no longer under the Law in any way.
Could you possibly point me to some of those advocates that you believe hold to something different than I do? I am truly interested in reading some of them. I don't ask as a point of debate.What you are expressing is not Antinomian, no. But what you are expressing is not what comes out of the mouths of a whole lot of advocates of Free Grace.
FTR, I don't personally put much value in OSAS theology -- I think that that is a question that is largely irrelevant if one is living in obedience to Christ.
Not sure what OSAS is, but this is true![]()
^^ Right, the Lordship view, from what I understand, states that the believer WILL show fruit if the salvation is truly by God's grace, since we do not believe in a half-competent God but a life changing God right?