Kamala thinks the government has the right to walk into your home to make sure your guns are compliant with said government's rules.

[Hammster]

The complete statement:

"We're going to require responsible behaviors among everybody in the community, and just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way you conduct your affairs," Harris told a group of reporters in May 2007.

The remarks came during a press conference introducing legislation that Harris helped draft, which sought to impose penalties for gun owners who fail to store their firearms properly at home.

Kamala Harris once said police could pay surprise visits to legal gun owners' homes for safe storage checks

As San Francisco's district attorney, Kamala Harris told legal gun owners in her community that authorities could "walk into" their homes to inspect whether they were storing their firearms properly under a new law she helped draft.

www.aol.com

They have no right to enter a home to see if someone stores a gun a certain way.

 

[joymercy]

As an aside to the OP:

Just how far reaching will be the scope of private investigation into how we conduct our affairs?

How safe do we conduct ourselves, could that be extended to include making sure we all have fire extinguishers and up to date smoke alarms, and a first aid kit, as well as all knives stored safely in the kitchen block?

Just wondering.

 

[rambot]

Then you have no point.

Nope. It's just another in a litany of points that get disregarded for some intangible reason.
\
Post 14.

anything since 2007 to support your view that Harris has not flip flopped on this issue?

 

[Hammster]

Nope. It's just another in a litany of points that get disregarded for some intangible reason.
\
Post 14.

anything since 2007 to support your view that Harris has not flip flopped on this issue?

Whether or not she has is irrelevant.

 

[rambot]

Whether or not she has is irrelevant.

Nothing is irrelevant ever I guess.

 

[Hammster]

Nothing is irrelevant ever I guess.

Her values haven’t changed. So whether she says she still believes this, or whether she says she changed her mind, she believes this or she was lying back then.

 

[rambot]

Her values haven’t changed. So whether she says she still believes this, or whether she says she changed her mind, she believes this or she was lying back then.

Really? She was lying?

She wouldn't change her mind. She MUST have been lying?

 

[Hammster]

Really? She was lying?

She wouldn't change her mind. She MUST have been lying?

She’s the one who said her values haven’t changed.