• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

J.K. Rowling Reveals 'Harry Potter' Character Dumbledore Is Gay.

Phylogeny

Veteran
Dec 28, 2004
1,599
134
✟2,426.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
So basically, she just made him gay to stir up some controversy. Yawn.

I doubt it. Rowling has shown in the past that she has written far more information on her characters than she puts in her book.

Also, in the last book, Dumbledore's relationship with 'his great love' is an important point. However, because it is a book aimed at younger readers, she never alludes to the fact they were lovers, merely 'very good friends'. Now that she's mentioned the point that Dumbledore was in love with this character, I think the storyline makes much more sense (from an adult POV).

This isn't the only time she treats adult subjects in such oblique way in her book (there was a rape scene which is never said out loud as one). I doubt she's just saying it now to stir up controversy since the last book came out months ago. If she wanted to stir up controversy, she would have done it a long time ago. Her books are a great deal of fun precisely because it can be enjoyed on different levels.

For me, I got a great kick out of the fact that she made a character gay in what is typically thought of as children's fiction. :D

I remember back in the days when people would speculate about which character is gay, but most people just assumed that Rowling would never do that because she was writing for 'little children'. I guess she showed us. :D
 
Upvote 0

Glaz

Obama '08
Jun 22, 2004
6,233
552
✟31,637.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Kind of like Falwell.

_276677_teletubby300.jpg
Again, yawn, I am not a Falwell fan so thats not going to rile me up like you think.
 
Upvote 0

Lord_Marx

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
890
61
✟23,921.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
These are children's books. Trust it to adults to defile them for their own purposes.

In my opinion, J.K. stopped writing the Harry Potter series after book four and started off on some... other series. Books 5 through 7 certainly do not belong with the first four, magical, works of literature.

Y.
They kind of go through book pubery at that point. The world changes a lot between ages 10-14 and 15+.
 
Upvote 0

Billnew

Legend
Apr 23, 2004
21,246
1,234
59
Ohio
Visit site
✟42,863.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
If they have to tell us, it doesn't matter.

He could have been or they could have changed it to be Pc.

Now if he was feminine or the annoying flaming style,
then it would be real problem.

Its just not politically correct to write a book or do a movie without the token homosexual in it.
 
Upvote 0

bunced

Well-Known Member
Apr 4, 2007
3,867
241
✟5,413.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Labour
Its just not politically correct to write a book or do a movie without the token homosexual in it.
Though maybe you could also argue that it is just being representative of the society at large, because in a book with the number of characters that Harry Potter has, statistically speaking, one of them will be gay anyways
 
Upvote 0