Is Godspell Blasphemous? Do They Mock Christianity?

[HonestTruth]

I don't understand why anyone would think this play was not reverent. It was highly entertaining and reflected genuine Christian reverence.

 

[Inkachu]

Many, many christians make a big fuss about Jesus Christ Superstar...no comment abt that...but...

'GodSpell', a musical based on the book of Matthew, depicts Jesus as a clown and his followers look like carefree hippies. It's set in NY in the 70's and it's got lots of good music and dancing and a good adaptation of the gospel.

I think it's absolutely brilliant, but it's hard to explain how Jesus' character can be illustrated through a clown....and when I told this to some of my friends, they were like...'Jesus? A clown?! Isn't that blasphemous...?'

If you've seen it...what are your thoughts on it? Blasphemous...or something deeper?

I know this thread is OLD, but I still wanted to chime in.

I was in "Godspell" a year or two ago. I don't really find the play to be "blasphemous" or anything so melodramatic, but I did think it was just sort of... stupid. It would be one thing to have people dressed as clowns or hippies and still acting relatively adult-like, but the characters in Godspell kind of revert to being like five-year old kids. The songs are catchy and fun, but the scenes in between seem awkward and cheesy. Then you go from being all silly and childish to suddenly screaming and writhing in agony as Jesus is killed... it's just very, very weird to me. It's like, one of those things that people call "artistic" for the sake of wanting to feel "artsy" themselves, when in reality, it's just weird and strange and bizarre, and everyone kinda knows it, but nobody wants to say it.

Anywho. On with the discussion!

 

[jayem]

I haven't seen it. I always thought it was kind of a Jesus Christ Superstar wannabe.

The music, btw, was written by the same guy who did Wicked.

 

[mattr61]

My own personal interaction with the material was about eight years ago, when I was cast as the Jesus character. Though I never had the opportunity to perform the play in front of an audience (moving out of the area), I did memorize the script and songs and spent a lot of time with the material. And I can see where the split comes between those for it and those unsure about its intentions.

I definitely believe there was a lot of emotion and spiritual ignorance that went into its writing. Tebelak wrote Godpsell with the express purpose of, "creating a religious experience", after feeling disillusioned by an Easter Vigil he'd attended (newlinetheatre.com). To be sure, the original intent of Godspell was not to praise our Savior but to entertain an audience.

But can't we just 'use it' to glorify God? Absolutely, if that's what the Lord desires. And maybe it's a good tool to draw people into a conversation about Him. I just think the whole issue needs to be approached with a lot of prayer for those who feel they might want to participate in the play.

I did not do this when I accepted the role. And I'm grateful the Lord delivered me out of it (though at the time I was crushed).

To answer your question, I think it very easily could be blasphemous. We are talking about the image of Christ and the words of our Holy Scriptures as entertainment. Your friends are right. There should always be an applied reverence to those subjects.

For sure, Godspell is the Gospel of Matthew according to Tebelak and Schwartz. I'd be careful about drawing too much meaning out of the thing.

Reference -

newlinetheatre.com(/)godspellchapter.html

 

[Inkachu]

Honestly, I wouldn't be in that show again if a part was handed to me.

 

[mattr61]

I just went back and read your message, again:

"It's like, one of those things that people call "artistic" for the sake of wanting to feel "artsy" themselves, when in reality, it's just weird and strange and bizarre, and everyone kinda knows it, but nobody wants to say it." <--- Yep. This. lol

"For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles." (Romans 1:21-23)

 

[Richard Norris]

You all have no shame in being young. I was an evangelist to our troops in Germany in the early 70's during the "Jesus Freak" movement. Some fellow Soldiers and I, under the supervision of our Baptist Chaplain started a Christian coffee house. Because of relatable films such as "Godspell." many men were brought to the Lord that would not have been without it. Becoming all things to all men has its advantages.

 

[Cam Mach]

I liked it - primarily for the music. I've only seen the movie, not the stage version, and I thought it was kinda goofie. Definitely a product of its time.

 

[Kensie]

I am supposed to be in a production of "Godspell" soon. I've never seen the show nor have I really read much about it. As I began looking into it, I started seeing images that almost seemed to poke fun at Christ and the Gospel. I don't want to be in a show that is blasphemous in anyway... I was raised (& am continuing to be raised) in a Christian home, in a biblically sound teaching church and gospel-sharing community. I want my church friends to come see the show but I am concerned that it will lean more towards satire rather than true heartfelt message of the Gospel... Can anyone maybe give me insight on that?