Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
Nup. Still answering a question that no-one asked.
I think I did answer your question, you just don’t like the answer which did not fit your gotcha, get Trump narrative. Judges are not a god to be revered they must operate within the confines of the constitution just like everyone else. Some do not and it is just messy trying to deal with that but we will get that fixed. Higher courts are leaning more to Trumps position. The latest 9, O ruling by the supreme court is not against Trump it is a pause until that can be addressed by the court. I believe Tump is complying with that Supreme Court order.
They are subject to laws. Judges are here to ensure that they are faithfully executed.
Orders can be illegal. Obeying a clearly unlawful order should also result in a sericemember being subject to a judge.
In the unlikely event that someone with standing appeals to the court with a convincing argument based on the law, I don't see why not.
If course it is when tied to an unrest that unlawfully takes over a campus building and holds people there against their will, supporting terrorist organizations by ACTION not just words, etc. When you watch the videos of what occurred, yes it definately was an unsafe environment that he was apart of.
Judges are not in the military chain of command. Some may think they are but they are not.
You speak as though judges are the do all be all . Do you know what CO-EQUAL branch means? Judges have certain areas they have legal jurisdiction over and being commander in chief is not one of them. That authority is constitutionally given to the President. Our problem today is we have a few activist judges who do not know their place and they are trying to usurp authority not given them by the constitution.
When was the court case saying they were terrorists? Do your truly believe Donald's word is divine?
Certainly he can, as long as he follows the law. He's not a dictator or omnipotent. He has to faithfully execute the laws.
They cannot issue orders to the military directly, but they can tell the other branches of government to stop breaking the law. And, in some cases, that may require the Executive branch to modify or rescind its orders to the military.
When a case at law is brought before them, they are, in fact, the deciders. That's the role their branch plays. They do not write the laws. Nor can they summon a case out of thin air, but when a case is brought to them, they sit in judgment.
Importantly, the US courts (including the Supreme Court) are not "constitutional courts" like are found in some other systems where all rules are automatically reviewed for legality. It is the first responsibility of the Congress to ensure that the laws they write are constitutional and the second responsibility of the Executive to ensure that the law (including the Constitution) is faithfully executed.
The judge found probable cause that the government was violating the due process rights of migrants by deporting them to El Salvador without a hearing, so he ordered a temporary halt on all deportation flights.
