I will scientifically prove the existence of God to you

[AV1611VET]

If this is you pointing out that a literal reading of the bible is incompatable with science I agree.

Phew! You had me scared there for a moment!

Thank you for your honesty.

I would like to point out that if academians are just educated people and you distrust all of them then thats quite a lot of people.

Yes, it most certainly is.

Most of them we refer to as "mission fields."

 

[dlamberth]

God created the universe over a six-day period, by a series of miracles that raised the level of mass/energy in it from zero to what it is today.

Please, while your at it, explain to @Discussion why the Earth and all of the geological features appear to be way older than 6000 years.

​

 

[Discussion]

Then what did you mean by this:

As I'm sure you're aware many people who consider themselves Christians think your Embedded Age Creationism is complete lunacy and they believe the bible is true but not always necessarily in a literal way. Such as not believing in the Garden of Eden or creation in 6 days.

 

[AV1611VET]

It's not an error. You say the world WAS CREATED 6000 years ago. Ergo, you believe in a young earth with the APPERANCE of old age. Appearance does not equal actual age.

Therefor, you are a YEC.

As I said, you keep that up, and you're only going to confuse anyone who believes you.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

As I said, you keep that up, and you're only going to confuse anyone who believes you.

Do you or do you not believe and claim that the earth was created 6000 years ago? Yay or nay?

 

[Discussion]

Please, while your at it, explain to @Discussion why the Earth and all of the geological features appear to be way older than 6000 years.

​

Sorry to bother you, out of interest what religion do you follow (as I'm sure you're aware it's listed as "Other Religion")?

 

[AV1611VET]

Just kinda a random point, if you're an "Embedded Age Creationist" then why did God make the universe so big if its just for us?

Good question!

The universe is also a haven for angels as well.

I see planets as "resort hotels" for angels.

Some like a hot spa? go to Mercury.

Some like the cold? go to Pluto.

 

[Discussion]

Good question!

The universe is also a haven for angels as well.

I see planets as "resort hotels" for angels.

Some like a hot spa? go to Mercury.

Some like the cold? go to Pluto.

What a unique view.

 

[AV1611VET]

Anyone who disagrees with his interpretation ...

Let's see yours.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Let's see yours.

I don't hold to a literal interpretation of the Bible. That's all need be said.

 

[AV1611VET]

Please, while your at it, explain to @Discussion why the Earth and all of the geological features appear to be way older than 6000 years.

Sure.

Geological features, such as the Grand Canyon for example, appear to be older, because academia teaches them they are.

People are taught that the Colorado River carved that canyon over a period of some five to six million years.

Whereas in reality, the Grand Canyon is a rip in the earth's surface.

In short, academia sees the Grand Canyon as a beautiful geological phenomenon; whereas in reality, it is a terrible rip in God's creation caused by sin.

 

[Discussion]

Out of interest again @AV1611VET, just a fun verse Kings 7:23-26 (KJV): And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about. This means that pi would be = 3 (I assume you're familiar with how the dimensions of circles work) and unfortunatly this isn't true. Is the bible wrong or are all circles wrong?

 

[AV1611VET]

As I'm sure you're aware many people who consider themselves Christians think your Embedded Age Creationism is complete lunacy and they believe the bible is true but not always necessarily in a literal way. Such as not believing in the Garden of Eden or creation in 6 days.

What do you want me to do?

Start agreeing with them, so they'll stop thinking I'm some kind of lunatic?

 

[AV1611VET]

Do you or do you not believe and claim that the earth was created 6000 years ago? Yay or nay?

Yay.

 

[Discussion]

Sure.

Geological features, such as the Grand Canyon for example, appear to be older, because academia teaches them they are.

People are taught that the Colorado River carved that canyon over a period of some five to six million years.

Whereas in reality, the Grand Canyon is a rip in the earth's surface.

In short, academia sees the Grand Canyon as a beautiful geological phenomenon; whereas in reality, it is a terrible rip in God's creation caused by sin.

Wow I didn't know sin could do that? You'd think all that pesky sin people have done in the past 1000 years would have caused more of those especially with all these woke satan worshipers running around now but I guess God must have decided they looked ugly on his favourite planet.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Yay.

Young Earth Creationist.

 

[Discussion]

What do you want me to do?

Start agreeing with them, so they'll stop thinking I'm some kind of lunatic?

No I was just pointing out there are other interpretations.

 

[AV1611VET]

What a unique view.

Ya ... wanna hear something academia should consider REALLY UNIQUE!?

I believe Jesus walked on water!

 

[AV1611VET]

I don't hold to a literal interpretation of the Bible. That's all need be said.

Thanks for the QED.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Thanks for the QED.

No idea why that needs to be QED'd since I'd have thought that much was obvious, but all right.