How will you react if Trump wins electorally but is declared unfit to be president?

[FaithT]

He’s a dangerous man and I hope he loses another election, though I fear what he and his Kool Aid drinking fans will do, if he does.

 

[Aldebaran]

He’s a dangerous man and I hope he loses another election.

And if he doesn't lose? Do you have some sort of plan to defend the democracy that Kamala has frightened half the country into believing he's the biggest threat to?

 

[FaithT]

And if he doesn't lose? Do you have some sort of plan to defend the democracy that Kamala has frightened half the country into believing he's the biggest threat to

Kamala has done no such thing and I have no”plan” if he wins other than accept it and fear.

 

[Aldebaran]

Kamala has done no such thing and I have no”plan” if he wins other than accept it and fear.

You say she hasn't frightened half the country into believing he's the biggest threat, and then you say you have no plan but to accept it and "fear".
Sounds like you just fell for the Kamala plan without realizing it.

 

[FaithT]

You say she hasn't frightened half the country into believing he's the biggest threat, and then you say you have no plan but to accept it and "fear".
Sounds like you just fell for the Kamala plan without realizing it.

Wrong. I feared Trump long before I ever heard of Kamala.

 

[stevevw]

I can recall several incidents of Trump himself using "dangerous rhetoric". I am sure you can also.

Not like Harris, Biden and other Leftist ideologues and media have. But after the assassination attempt everyone settled down as it was going too far on both sides. Since then I don't think Trump has said anything on the level of equating Harris as Hitler or wanting to take her out.

Besides two wrongs don't make a right. If the Left claim they are the party of higher morals then they should not be engaging in such rhetoric even if Trump is. Its a silly game to be saying because the opposition is doing it then we can do it too. Especially the Left knowing that such rhetoric is going to affect Trump much more considering he has already had attempts on his life.

 

[Aldebaran]

Wrong. I feared Trump long before I ever heard of Kamala.

I see. So you and half the country are just letting Kamala play off the fears you already have.
Here's an idea: Become informed and vote accordingly rather than letting fear be your guide--and not letting a politician (who never even received a single vote to be the Dem nominee) play on those fears.

 

[FaithT]

I see. So you and half the country are just letting Kamala play off the fears you already have.
Here's an idea: Become informed and vote accordingly rather than letting fear be your guide--and not letting a politician (who never even received a single vote to be the Dem nominee) play on those fears.

I’ll vote for whom I think will be the best choice for our country. Trump had his opportunity, he failed and then lost. Now I’m willing to give Kamala a chance.
And It is a bit funny how for months Kamala didnt fight back. She just took all the vitriol Trump spewed out and nobody else said a word. At first I admired her for taking the high road but then even I got sick of it and wanted her to toughen up. Trump is like the bully on the playground where the teacher just looks the other way until someone gives him a taste of his own medicine and then they BOTH get in trouble.

 

[lifepsyop]

He says he will use the military to deal with "the enemy within" and names Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff. Meanwhile he also says he will pardon these guys:

Is that anyone's idea of America?

So if Trump wins and there is mass violence and terror waged by anti-Trump groups, you think that will be justified and even Trump's fault for being such a threat to democracy?

Or will such organized violence be an 'insurrection' and an attempt at undermining a fair election?

Trying to get a feel for what people actually think about this.

 

[lifepsyop]

Besides two wrongs don't make a right. If the Left claim they are the party of higher morals then they should not be engaging in such rhetoric even if Trump is. Its a silly game to be saying because the opposition is doing it then we can do it too. Especially the Left knowing that such rhetoric is going to affect Trump much more considering he has already had attempts on his life.

I could be wrong, but I have a feeling in the next few weeks and months, we're going to find out just how power-hungry and un-principled the Left really is.

Whenever they are gaining power they are "saving democracy"
Whenever they are losing power or being challenged on power then "democracy is under attack"

That's basically what their entire moral framework boils down to.

When they saw BLM marching through the streets and threatening people to 'raise their fists in solidarity or else'... or taking over police stations and burning down city blocks... when people lived in terror... that was ultimately okay because it was 'for the cause of democracy'

On the other hand, when some windows got broken on J6, it was democracy on the brink.

So, as to the OP. It seems to me that anything they try to do (whether it is "lawfare" or organized/encouraged political violence), it will be viewed as a necessity for essentially stopping the return of Hitler, which is how they talk about Trump every day.

 

[o_mlly]

Trump had his opportunity, he failed and then lost. Now I’m willing to give Kamala a chance.

Uhh ... Harris has been VP for over 3+ years. She's had her chance already ... been involved with Biden in making every important decision. The two of them and their policies have made many of us poorer and less secure.

As a Catholic, are you pro-abortion, for same sex marriages and transgender mutilation? She is.

 

[Akita Suggagaki]

So if Trump wins and there is mass violence and terror waged by anti-Trump groups, you think that will be justified and even Trump's fault for being such a threat to democracy?

Or will such organized violence be an 'insurrection' and an attempt at undermining a fair election?

Trying to get a feel for what people actually think about this.

Trump set a very bed precedent in doubting and denying the valid election and then doing nothing as his people went violent.
That does not justify any future violence related to election results. It should not be tolerated anywhere.

But surely you can see that use the military to deal with "the enemy within" and naming Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff specifically is a whole other class of dangerous rhetoric that in this case may not be rhetoric at all but threat.

 

[Akita Suggagaki]

MSN

Just ahead of the 2024 election, the current administration appears to be setting up the narrative framework that Trump is an illegitimate candidate (because he's unstable, or a fascist, or otherwise a "threat to democracy"...)

Hypothetically speaking, if Trump ends up having a clear electoral victory that is not in question....

How will you react if the current administration still attempts to block his swearing in as President by invoking some sort of state of emergency in order to deny Trump the presidency.

I don't think that will happen at all. If it does it will be another nail in the coffin of our democracy.

Will you consider this a coup attempt by the existing administration to overturn the election results?

If it happened, yes.

Or you will view such an electoral denial as acceptable in order to protect democracy?

No

As a follow-up question, (and this question is particularly for those who believe January 6th was an "Insurrection" ) if Trump wins and there is any kind of mass violence or trespassing on government property by anti-Trump protestors during the electoral confirmation process, will you likewise perceive this as an insurrection attempt to overturn the electoral process?

Yes, but It would l be a stupid and futile attempt.

 

[FaithT]

Uhh ... Harris has been VP for over 3+ years. She's had her chance already ... been involved with Biden in making every important decision. The two of them and their policies have made many of us poorer and less secure.

As a Catholic, are you pro-abortion, for same sex marriages and transgender mutilation? She is.

No exceptin times to save the mother. As for same sex marriages, it was Trump who was making lewd comments about Arnold Palmers genitals….with a smile on his face. And no

 

[FaithT]

Uhh ... Harris has been VP for over 3+ years. She's had her chance already ... been involved with Biden in making every important decision. The two of them and their policies have made many of us poorer and less secure.

As a Catholic, are you pro-abortion, for same sex marriages and transgender mutilation? She is.

Had a chances to do what??????? She is VICE President not the President.

 

[o_mlly]

No exceptin times to save the mother. As for same sex marriages, it was Trump who was making lewd comments about Arnold Palmers genitals….with a smile on his face. And no

That's not Harris's position on abortion and Trump did not claim he wished to marry Palmer.

 

[o_mlly]

Had a chances to to what??????? She is VICE President not the President.

She reports that she was always involved (last person in the room with Joe) in making those important decisions, said she can't think of a thing she'd do differently to Biden as pres. What more do you need?

 

[Merrill]

Trump set a very bed precedent in doubting and denying the valid election and then doing nothing as his people went violent.
That does not justify any future violence related to election results. It should not be tolerated anywhere.

But surely you can see that use the military to deal with "the enemy within" and naming Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff specifically is a whole other class of dangerous rhetoric that in this case may not be rhetoric at all but threat.

Democrats have been denying election results since 2000. Dozens of Democratic politicians, including Hillary Clinton, have called the results of 2000 and 2016, illegitimate, illegal, stolen, fraudulent, etc.

It was the formal position of the Democratic Party that both Trump and Bush Jr. were not legitimate presidents, that the elections were stolen by SCOTUS, Russians, fraud, etc. They called upon their supporters to resist the administration, and the far-left contingent (ANTIFA, etc.) asserted that Trump be removed from office using coercion and violence

so this is pot calling kettle black

Democrats are planning to refuse to certify the election if Trump wins

Democrats May Refuse to Certify a Trump Election If He Wins. The Supreme Court Could Prevent That | National Review

The House alone can’t sustain an objection to electors certified by a state governor; 51 senators would have to take the same position.

www.nationalreview.com

and they are planning on giving amnesty and citizenship to 30 million illegals, thus ensuring one-party rule in the US, and a subversion of our Democratic system

 

[JimR-OCDS]

"if Trump wins electorally but is declared unfit to be president?"​

If this were to happen, it would be the end of the United States as it would set off an armed civil war.

 

[FaithT]

She reports that she was always involved (last person in the room with Joe) in making those important decisions, said she can't think of a thing she'd do differently to Biden as pres. What more do you need?

Somebody other than Trump. He’s already proven he’s a lousy President and an even worse human being.