Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Illegal immigrants should not be in our nation. For some strange reason, the USA appears to be one of the only nations that don't want to enforce border security.You do realize that we have a system already in place for such individuals. Arrest, prosecution, incarceration, release then deportation. The severity of the crime will significantly impact the likelihood of deportation. The key difference here is " mass deportation, " it eliminates any and all processes in place that are part of our humane immigration system. In other words no human rights.
A sweet tempered Mr Nice Guy will get eaten alive by the Washington DC swamp.Yeah, that is the very un-Christian policies of Kamala. We need to prevent illegal immigration though, and prevent the woke agenda, but I am waiting for a guy who is sweet tempered to take up that task.We have not had such a guy since Romney ran in 2012.
Haha, so true. That is why I do not want to be a politician, nor do I want you to become a politician either, as the two of us are too nice to run for office. We would both get eaten alive within a week or so. I'd be eaten alive by both parties.A sweet tempered Mr Nice Guy will get eaten alive by the Washington DC swamp.
I live in the same country as you do. We have border security, quite extensively. The issue is demonizing immigrants when they are the very backbone of this country. It is the ultimate example of hypocrisy. Think about it. Thanks for engaging.Illegal immigrants should not be in our nation. For some strange reason, the USA appears to be one of the only nations that don't want to enforce border security.
Allowing millions upon millions of illegal immigrants across our borders is, in my opinion, a very strange way of defining border security.I live in the same country as you do. We have border security, quite extensively. The issue is demonizing immigrants when they are the very backbone of this country. It is the ultimate example of hypocrisy. Think about it. Thanks for engaging.
Agreed. If these immigrants want to enter our country, they must seek proper channels, such as asylum, green card, or choosing the path of citizenship instead of crossing the border illegally. If the proper channels for immigrating to the US can not be met, then the immigrants must choose to migrate to another country.Allowing millions upon millions of illegal immigrants across our borders is, in my opinion, a very strange way of defining border security.
Those are the ones who are caught and processed. I'm affraid you have been given wrong information. Here is the information on how those millions and millions of people get processed when they get caught.Allowing millions upon millions of illegal immigrants across our borders is, in my opinion, a very strange way of defining border security.
And what do you say should be done about the millions of illegal immigrants who are NOT processed, who are not caught by Border Patrol?Those are the ones who are caught and processed. I'm affraid you have been given wrong information. Here is the information on how those millions and millions of people get processed when they get caught.
The process for an undocumented immigrant caught crossing the border illegally can vary depending on several factors, including:
* Location of Crossing: Where the individual crosses the border (e.g., land, sea) can influence the initial response.
* Circumstances of Crossing: Whether the individual is alone, in a group, or with a smuggler can affect the process.
* Prior Immigration History: If the individual has been deported before, they may face stricter penalties.
* Criminal Record: Any criminal history can impact the outcome.
Generally, the process involves these steps:
* Apprehension: Border patrol agents or other law enforcement personnel detain the individual.
* Identification and Screening: The individual's identity is verified, and they are screened for criminal history or national security concerns.
* Detention: The individual is typically detained in an immigration detention facility.
* Initial Appearance: The individual appears before an immigration judge within a certain timeframe.
* Removal Proceedings: If the individual is found to be ineligible for admission, removal proceedings begin.
* Possible Relief: The individual may seek relief from removal, such as asylum or a humanitarian visa, but this requires meeting specific criteria.
* Deportation: If no relief is granted, the individual is deported back to their country of origin.
Important Notes:
* The process can be complex and time-consuming.
* Individuals have the right to legal representation during these proceedings.
* The specific rules and procedures can change over time.
For more detailed information, you can consult with an immigration attorney or visit the official U.S. government website for immigration information:
* USAGov: Home
Well, I am not sure this product came from a country which was truly Christian. I think what we are seeing is a product.When even those who claim to be conservative walk away from absolute truth, as clearly revealed in Scripture, what should Christians do? How should we approach an election when the flaws of the candidates and the imperfections of both parties seem more evident than ever before?
Really? Need to dig a bit deeper.
I say...thank you for picking up the slack where most Americans do not want to participate in such as, but not limited to, these jobs:And what do you say should be done about the millions of illegal immigrants who are NOT processed, who are not caught by Border Patrol?
Kamala sounds more Christ like.
One of them supports abortion, regardless of reasoning, while the other slanders his opponents and moderates and does not care for the environment. So yes, both candidates are not showing much love. One harms the kids, while the other harms his own party.
Well I say screw both sides. We need a party founded on Christian values, the American Solidarity Party is the only answer, but that is for another discussion. Now Trump supports IVF and allows abortion on a state by state basis, while Kamala has gotten even more woke.Be careful of idolatry.. especially when it's more important to see some reflection of what you think you are behind the seal instead of a president in office who is competent for the job.
There's 350 million people whose lives depend on making the best decisions for their future and their children's future, not to mention things like how WW3 would affect everyone in the world.
Well I say screw both sides. We need a party founded on Christian values, the American Solidarity Party is the only answer, but that is for another discussion. Now Trump supports IVF and allows abortion on a state by state basis, while Kamala has gotten even more woke.
Yeah, but we can at least both agree that the current form of Democrats suck.Trump really had nothing to do with the new abortion laws. That was the Supreme Court.
Yes, Trump put good Justices forward and we appreciate each one but it's not like anyone knew they would overturn Roe v Wade.
However, it's the Supreme Court who, when they overturned Roe v Wade, kicked the issue of abortion back to the states.
Which means, abortion is a voter ballot issue in our respective states, according to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Not according to Trump, though he's taking all the credit... Lol. He can pat himself on the back, he did appoint the right justices after all.
But this now being a state issue - that's according to the highest court in the land.
That said, people can try and federalize it and run it up to the Supreme Court, but they seem pretty clear they will reject any federalization of abortion.
This is why the Democrats want to pack the Supreme Court with left wing ideologues, to overrule the more conservative justices.
If the Democratic party gets a super majority they will try.
Yes, Kamala boasts of her support for Abortion rights and Trump boast about things we ought not even mention.Well I say screw both sides. We need a party founded on Christian values, the American Solidarity Party is the only answer, but that is for another discussion. Now Trump supports IVF and allows abortion on a state by state basis, while Kamala has gotten even more woke.
Yeah, but we can at least both agree that the current form of Democrats suck.
I am a moderate, so I am not a fan of the current GOP candidate, but if we had a moderate GOP candidate, he would probably win more votes compared to Trump. In other words, if we want to fight the woke, we must have someone moderate enough that could attract even 5-10% of the most conservative liberals, then, we could have a chance of having 55-60% GOP votes, 40-45% Democratic votes, and have a moderate GOP candidate win the election by a landslide.
Perhaps a moderate candidate from either party would win by a landslide. Who knows?Yeah, but we can at least both agree that the current form of Democrats suck.
I am a moderate, so I am not a fan of the current GOP candidate, but if we had a moderate GOP candidate, he would probably win more votes compared to Trump. In other words, if we want to fight the woke, we must have someone moderate enough that could attract even 5-10% of the most conservative liberals, then, we could have a chance of having 55-60% GOP votes, 40-45% Democratic votes, and have a moderate GOP candidate win the election by a landslide.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?