Okay, I can go with that. Can you agree, then, that Genesis 1 does not address the triple nature of man, which is elucidated later, especially in the NT?
No because there was nothing to elucidate (i like that word

).
Exactly! Thus, when Adam became a living being, that is exactly what happened - his life came into him. It does not mean that he did not gain a soul or a spirit at that point in time, but merely that he came to life. The point of the verse is not to explain the divine nature placed within Adam but merely to express the fact that he came to life.
His life was the breath of God which made Him a soul. A soul is the union of the breath of God and the body of man. How can you say what the point of the verse is? And what do you mean by divine nature?
Yes, this is the same book where he both said Adam became a living person (being or soul) and that Rachel's soul (life) departed from her. This is not rocket science. Moses did not intend to make deep theological statements about the nature of the human being in either instance. The very best we can say in either instance is that life (soul) came and went - end of story.
To clarify, do you believe that the meaning behind the soul departing was to express that the soul was going back to heaven?
When you die your body remains on earth and your soul and spirit either go to heaven or hell. I do not know of any medical records proving that any person's last breath went to heaven. Because Jesus made a play on words in John 3 about the Holy Spirit and the wind, do you believe, as do some, that the Holy Spirit is nothing more or less than a gust of air?
Medical records? Really? What medical records prove that when you die your spirit and soul goes to heaven? And what's the difference between the soul and spirit, aren't they one in the same? And why is it that you have no problem understanding Jesus' play on words in regards to the Spirit, but you can't believe the NT writers would use a play on words in regards to the use of the word soul?
Please accept my apologies for the sarcasm.
It's cool. I actually enjoy our exchanges.
The OT is filled with references to the spirit and to the soul, so I doubt that the NT writers suddenly came up with these ideas on their own. What you have done is to cherrypick a verse from Genesis 1 to support your doctrine and have ignored other, equally relevant passages and verses, many of which expand upon the notion that man is a living being. There is absolutely no contradiction between believing that man is a living being and that man is made in the image of God, is there?
I agree that they didn't just come up with this either. And No, I don't see any contradiction between man being created in the image of God and being a living being. That said: there is no cherrypicking occurring here, at least no more then what you are doing. My understanding stems from Genesis, Psalms, Ecclesiastes, Isaiah, Malachi, etc.
Thus, the Apostles actually were not the country bumpkins that some have made them out to be. Nor, for that matter, were the writers of the OT who also referenced angels, seraphim cherubim, the adversary (Satan), and demons.
No, they were simple men lol. They were just simple men who had faith in their God, which made it easy for God to use them. But what does the existence of angels and demons and so forth have to do with ghosts?
Now it is my turn to be confused. You wrote "I don't know what SDA's you've spoken with but we teach that the Father, Son, and Spirit are separate beings. Co-Eternal and Equal. One God. The Father is the Father. The Son is the Son. The Spirit is the Spirit." That was in response to my trinitarian statement about God being an eternal spirit. Apparently you do not understand the hypostatic union (actually, I am not sure that any of us fully comprehend it). Otherwise I doubt you would have said that you believe in three separate beings.
I won't try to explain what is beyond my ability to completely comprehend. What I do know is that scripture says the Word was with God and the Word was God. Scripture says "Let us make man in our image". I see at the Baptism of Christ the Father speaking from heaven, and the Spirit descending as a dove. I know that God is one. And that's about the best I can give you.
I would never say that God, the Holy Spirit, is the same thing as your breath. What I believe is that even as the Holy Spirit is integral with the godhead so our spirit is integral to who we are. Our spirit is not a mass of air that gets inhaled and exhaled any more than the Holy Spirt is a gust of wind.
Indeed. I was just saying that I wouldn't use the term possession in the same fashion. I believe the Father, Son, and Spirit are One.
Therefore you reject the trinity which is one God composed of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit - not three separate gods.
No. Sorry I don't. I believe One God - Three Persons. Again, it's out of my scope to fathom so I won't try to break it down since I can't.