How United Methodists understand Holy Communion arose as part of another thread. I think we've sidetracked that thread enough, and that a thread specifically dedicated to that topic would probably be helpful for many.
Now there are many good places for instruction on this topic: The Book of Worship and This Holy Mystery: A United Methodist Understanding of Holy Communion being probably the two most notable. But to get us jump started, I would like to quote from a smaller body of work, the section on Holy Communion as found in Journey To Discipleship: Confirmation Curriculum for United Methodists. (This comes from the teacher's guide, pages 89 & 90.)
Of course, that which is written for a confirmation lesson is not going to be as in depth as one might go in seminary, or even in one's personal reading, but other than that I believe the Lutheran clergy I know would take exception to the author's portrayal of the Lutheran view of the sacrament, this seems fairly consistent as a summary of that teaching regarding the United Methodist understanding of Holy Communion which I received in seminary and subsequent examinations by my conference's Board of Ordained Ministry in preparation to be ordained an elder in the United Methodist Church.
What thoughts, questions, affirmations, and/or disagreements might the members of this forum have with the above view(s)?
Now there are many good places for instruction on this topic: The Book of Worship and This Holy Mystery: A United Methodist Understanding of Holy Communion being probably the two most notable. But to get us jump started, I would like to quote from a smaller body of work, the section on Holy Communion as found in Journey To Discipleship: Confirmation Curriculum for United Methodists. (This comes from the teacher's guide, pages 89 & 90.)
The other sacrament [baptism being discussed first in this unit on the Sacraments] celebrated in the United Methodist Church is on that is know by many terms: the Lord's Supper, Communion, and "The Eucharist" (a Greek word meaning thanksgiving), among others. Jesus Christ gave the church this sacrament as a rememberance of his dying for sinful people so that by participation in it, the church has communion for fellowship with him
The "Words of Institution of the Lord's Supper", which are always read as a part of the celebration of this sacrament, are found in the Apostle Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians (1 Corinthians 11:23-26):
"for I received from the Lord the teaching that Ipassed on to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took a piece of bread, gave thanks to God, broke it, and said, 'This is my body, which is for you. Do this in memory of me.' In the same way, after the supper he took the cup and said, 'This cup is God's new covenant, sealed with my blood. Whenver you drink it, do so in memory of me. This means that every time you eat this bread and drink from this cup you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes."The Lord's Supper, like Baptism, is an outward and visible sign of something inward and invisible. It is a sign of God's grace or forgiving love, given to us in order to strengthen and help us in the weakness of our faith. When Jesus took the common bread and wine and blessed them, and explained what they stood for, they became a sign and symbol of what he was about to do for all humankind on the cross.
Interesting views have been held throughout the church regarding the bread and wine of the Lord's Supper. The Medieval Roman Catholic Church taught that in the Lord's Supper, the "substance" of the bread and wine were changed into the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ. This doctrine is called "TRANSUBSTANTIATION". The change, they believed, did not alter the outward appearance of these elements but rather changed their "essence" or "substance" into the actual body and blood of Christ.
Rejecting the doctrine of TRANSUBSTANTIATION, the Protestant Reformer, Martin Luther, taught a doctrine called "CONSUBSTANTIATION". Accordint to this doctrine, the "substance" of the bread and wine is not changed during the Lord's Supper but exists side by side with the substance of the body and blood of Christ.
A third view regarding the elements of the Lord's Supper was that Christ is really present as Host at the Lord's Supper, but that His presence is a spiritual one rather than a physical one. Methodists have generally had this understanding.
When you and I accept the bread and the wine today, we do it not just to remember Jesus, but to receive with a humble heart his love and salvation.
The frequency with which the Lord's Supper is celebrated is determined by each church's Administrative Board. The Lord's Supper, in United Methodist congregations, is "open". That means that all baptized Christians, regardless of their denomination, are invited to partake of this sacrament when it is celebrated.
[emphases such as CAPITALIZATION and the use of "quotation marks" are original to the author]
Of course, that which is written for a confirmation lesson is not going to be as in depth as one might go in seminary, or even in one's personal reading, but other than that I believe the Lutheran clergy I know would take exception to the author's portrayal of the Lutheran view of the sacrament, this seems fairly consistent as a summary of that teaching regarding the United Methodist understanding of Holy Communion which I received in seminary and subsequent examinations by my conference's Board of Ordained Ministry in preparation to be ordained an elder in the United Methodist Church.
What thoughts, questions, affirmations, and/or disagreements might the members of this forum have with the above view(s)?