ViaCrucis
Confessional Lutheran
- Oct 2, 2011
- 39,213
- 28,622
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
I feel it should be pointed out that "IQ" isn't quite real. Or rather, scoring high on an IQ test is not a proper measurement of intelligence, just as scoring low on an IQ test isn't.
And the problem with the way we treat IQ scores is that we act as though some people are just innately more intelligent than others. A position that I've always had an issue with as it ignores environmental factors as well as the fact that some people are drawn to different topics of interest. Someone may a great deal of competence, knowledge, and exercise a great deal of intelligence with one topic, but may be entirely ignorant of another topic. That lack of knowledge and competence in certain subjects does not render a person unintelligent.
Even further, since our brains are all wired slightly differently, we may find that one person has difficulty in one area of knowledge, but finds another area much easier. For example, I have always struggled with math. I can learn math, obviously, but it's a struggle.
I've studied a lot of history, so I know a lot about history (but I'm also always aware that there is more that I don't know than I know); but I don't think that makes me smarter than someone who hasn't studied much history. It just means that I've learned through study. By the same token, I know nearly nothing about automobiles, open up a car to let me look at the engine and I can find the radiator tank, figure out how to check the oil, and then everything else looks like a bunch of mangled metal that makes zero sense to me. I don't think my lack of knowledge about cars makes me dumb, it just makes me ignorant about cars.
IQ measurement is a pretty outdated idea, a left-over from some pretty awful racialized pseudo-science of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
The abbreviated version of this post: High IQ scores only measure how well one can score on an IQ test, not as a valid metric of real intelligence.
-CryptoLutheran
And the problem with the way we treat IQ scores is that we act as though some people are just innately more intelligent than others. A position that I've always had an issue with as it ignores environmental factors as well as the fact that some people are drawn to different topics of interest. Someone may a great deal of competence, knowledge, and exercise a great deal of intelligence with one topic, but may be entirely ignorant of another topic. That lack of knowledge and competence in certain subjects does not render a person unintelligent.
Even further, since our brains are all wired slightly differently, we may find that one person has difficulty in one area of knowledge, but finds another area much easier. For example, I have always struggled with math. I can learn math, obviously, but it's a struggle.
I've studied a lot of history, so I know a lot about history (but I'm also always aware that there is more that I don't know than I know); but I don't think that makes me smarter than someone who hasn't studied much history. It just means that I've learned through study. By the same token, I know nearly nothing about automobiles, open up a car to let me look at the engine and I can find the radiator tank, figure out how to check the oil, and then everything else looks like a bunch of mangled metal that makes zero sense to me. I don't think my lack of knowledge about cars makes me dumb, it just makes me ignorant about cars.
IQ measurement is a pretty outdated idea, a left-over from some pretty awful racialized pseudo-science of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
The abbreviated version of this post: High IQ scores only measure how well one can score on an IQ test, not as a valid metric of real intelligence.
-CryptoLutheran
Upvote
0