Democratic Party obstruction has begun

[RileyG]

Yes, I recall him preferring blonde hair and blue eyed immigrants, and not the brown ones from you know what hole countries.

He is literally going to revoke the temporary status of those who came from worn torn Haiti (the one's he falsely accused of eating dogs and cats) who are doing nothing but being productive working citizens in a town where they can't find workers.

How's that for compassion?

Who cares about his preferences? Lol

He’s just doing what is best for our nation.

We cannot take everyone in.

We don’t have the resources for that.

 

[Pommer]

Ok…?

Still I won’t judge Trump.

I’m happy he’s in the White House instead of Harris.

The healing of our nation has begun!

Not, (judging by the evidence of this thread).

 

[RileyG]

Not, (judging by the evidence of this thread).

He will always be divisive. The MSM isn’t helping. Our country really isn’t in a horrible shake, Trump will help heal it. My opinion only.

 

[Pommer]

[The thread drift is impressive]

 

[Say it aint so]

Who cares about his preferences? Lol

He’s just doing what is best for our nation.

We cannot take everyone in.

We don’t have the resources for that.

Who cares about his preferences?
Apparently someone here; "Trump has two wives who were immigrants."

 

[Say it aint so]

[The thread drift is impressive]

You're right. I'm done.
It's a game of wack-o-mole going no where. ......carry on...

 

[SeekFirst0]

Not, (judging by the evidence of this thread).

While not ideal to me, (I voted for Sonski), compared to Harris, he will do least the least harm to those who want to serve the Lord and the country overall. The executive order saying that only male and female will be recognized was good and that should be common sense lol.

 

[RileyG]

[The thread drift is impressive]

Indeed!

 

[RileyG]

Who cares about his preferences?
Apparently someone here; "Trump has two wives who were immigrants."

You missed the point.

The ethnicity of his wives or appearance is irrelevant.

 

[RileyG]

While not ideal to me, (I voted for Sonski), compared to Harris, he will do least the least harm to those who want to serve the Lord and the country overall. The executive order saying that only male and female will be recognized was good and that should be common sense lol.

Amen! We are back to biology and common sense, my friend! Harris wanted men in women’s restrooms lol

 

[RileyG]

You're right. I'm done.
It's a game of wack-o-mole going no where. ......carry on...

Have a lovely evening, sir.

 

[SeekFirst0]

Amen! We are back to biology and common sense, my friend! Harris wanted men in women’s restrooms lol

Indeed. I enjoy your posts! Nice to see someone passionate for maintaining righteousness in a sinful world with so many ills all around.

 

[RileyG]

Indeed. I enjoy your posts! Nice to see someone passionate for maintaining righteousness in a sinful world with so many ills all around.

Thanks!

 

[FAITH-IN-HIM]

"except for sexual immorality."

In other words, there are exceptions.

I'm sorry, but the only exception is sexual immorality. Today some contemporary Christians and churches are altering the Bible to align with modern society to fit their sinful lifestyle. It's unsurprising that some Christians believe it's acceptable to divorce twice, marry three times, and have multiple sexual partners while still considering themselves devout Christian.

 

[JimR-OCDS]

I'm sorry, but the only exception is sexual immorality. Today some contemporary Christians and churches are altering the Bible to align with modern society to fit their sinful lifestyle. It's unsurprising that some Christians believe it's acceptable to divorce twice, marry three times, and have multiple sexual partners while still considering themselves devout Christian.

It's not acceptable for the faithful. There is no altering of the Bible to
align with society, that has been clear by our Church leaders.

However, are the marriages these people first engaged in real marriages as willed by God,
or just their own ideas? Many entered marriage without faith in God and acted out of
social norms, often the will of their parents more than the will of God.

So, we still hold God's teachings as valid, but at the same time give God the souls of
the sinners, as Jesus did. As He stated, he came to save sinners, not the righteous.

 

[Larniavc]

And you know that he is not born again, how?

Nothing on his bio says he is. He could be. But he has not told anyone and nobody else knows.

So unless you just want him to be to score a point there is no compelling reason to believe that his is.

And therefore it is possible for him to lie.

 

[FAITH-IN-HIM]

It's not acceptable for the faithful. There is no altering of the Bible to
align with society, that has been clear by our Church leaders.

However, are the marriages these people first engaged in real marriages as willed by God,
or just their own ideas? Many entered marriage without faith in God and acted out of
social norms, often the will of their parents more than the will of God.

So, we still hold God's teachings as valid, but at the same time give God the souls of
the sinners, as Jesus did. As He stated, he came to save sinners, not the righteous.

It doesn’t matter if the marriage is willed by God or chosen by personal desire.

This is what Paul’s says.

1 Corinthians 7:12-14 “To the rest I say this (I, not the Lord): If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. 13 And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy.



The New Testament only allows divorce for sexual immorality.

 

[JimR-OCDS]

It doesn’t matter if the marriage is willed by God or chosen by personal desire.

This is what Paul’s says.

1 Corinthians 7:12-14 “To the rest I say this (I, not the Lord): If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. 13 And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy.



The New Testament only allows divorce for sexual immorality.

Oh, it matters a lot of the marriage was willed by God or not.

Hopefully, we follow God's will and not our own agenda.

 

[Clare73]

Nothing on his bio says he is. He could be. But he has not told anyone and nobody else knows.

Are you sure that he has told no one about his faith?

I've seen him refer to it on TV. . ."Jesus and Jenny. . ."

 

[Larniavc]

Are you sure that he has told no one about his faith?

I've seen him refer to it on TV. . ."Jesus and Jenny. . ."

Who has he told that he has been born again?