Bipartisan Business-Backed $78 Billion Tax Cut Hits GOP Roadblock in US Senate after 357-70 House vote; Why Give Biden a Win?

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,856
37,214
Los Angeles Area
✟841,737.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Senate Republicans are poised to sink a $78 billion tax-cut package, gambling that they’ll win the majority in November and can push then for bigger breaks for business.

They also don’t want to hand President Joe Biden an election-year victory on the legislation, which includes both child and business tax breaks, lawmakers and aides have said.

The package, the top business lobbying objective this year, easily passed the Republican-controlled House in January on a bipartisan 357 to 70 vote. It also has support of the White House.

The measure would restore expired tax breaks allowing businesses to more quickly recoup costs of domestic research and development, interest on business loans, and investment in new equipment. Working parents would receive more generous child tax credits, and be eligible for the first time to claim multiple children. Read more from Erik Wasson and Samantha Handler.
 

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
3,941
2,402
24
WI
✟132,016.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Senate Republicans are poised to sink a $78 billion tax-cut package, gambling that they’ll win the majority in November and can push then for bigger breaks for business.

They also don’t want to hand President Joe Biden an election-year victory on the legislation, which includes both child and business tax breaks, lawmakers and aides have said.

The package, the top business lobbying objective this year, easily passed the Republican-controlled House in January on a bipartisan 357 to 70 vote. It also has support of the White House.

The measure would restore expired tax breaks allowing businesses to more quickly recoup costs of domestic research and development, interest on business loans, and investment in new equipment. Working parents would receive more generous child tax credits, and be eligible for the first time to claim multiple children. Read more from Erik Wasson and Samantha Handler.
Paywalls, schmaywalls. Alright, time to bypass the paywalls, as information should be free. Hopefully a bi-partisan package passes, even though not all of it is ideal. Companies get a lot of tax breaks sadly.


Here is summary of the article, for those who do not have access to it:

The article by Brandon Lee and Jeannie Baumann, published on April 5, 2024, discusses the ongoing efforts by Senate Republicans to block a $78 billion tax-cut package that easily passed the Republican-controlled House in January with bipartisan support. The legislation, which includes child and business tax breaks, has White House support but is facing opposition from Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell and his No. 2, John Thune.

The child tax credits in the bill have become a contentious issue among Senate Republicans due to strong opposition from Senator Mike Crapo, the lead Republican on the Senate Finance Committee. Crapo has requested changes to the bill, including requiring parents of children receiving the credit to submit Social Security numbers to verify their immigration status and rescinding the retroactive break for 2023. However, Democrats are unwilling to make these changes, which had already been agreed upon in bipartisan negotiations.

McConnell and Thune's opposition to the bill is rooted in internal Senate GOP politics, as McConnell has abandoned his leadership post, and Thune is vying for the top spot. Thune does not want to alienate Crapo or other key committee leaders.

The tax package aims to restore expired tax breaks that allow businesses to recoup costs of domestic research and development, interest on business loans, and investment in new equipment. The measure also includes more generous child tax credits for working parents and allows them to claim multiple children for the first time.

Despite bipartisan support in the House, Senate Republicans' efforts to block the bill could result in a delay or even the defeat of the legislation. This move is seen as a gamble by the GOP, as they hope to win the majority in November and push for bigger breaks for businesses then. However, if Democrats maintain control of the Senate, President Joe Biden would secure a victory on the legislation.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
17,349
10,883
Earth
✟151,389.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Senate Republicans are poised to sink a $78 billion tax-cut package, gambling that they’ll win the majority in November and can push then for bigger breaks for business.

They also don’t want to hand President Joe Biden an election-year victory on the legislation, which includes both child and business tax breaks, lawmakers and aides have said.

The package, the top business lobbying objective this year, easily passed the Republican-controlled House in January on a bipartisan 357 to 70 vote. It also has support of the White House.

The measure would restore expired tax breaks allowing businesses to more quickly recoup costs of domestic research and development, interest on business loans, and investment in new equipment. Working parents would receive more generous child tax credits, and be eligible for the first time to claim multiple children. Read more from Erik Wasson and Samantha Handler.
Maybe we should try to run our federal legislative bodies less as a parliament, (where the party out of the White House acts as an opposition party) and get back to the consensus model that we had used for the first 200+ years?
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

The pickles are up to something
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
20,597
16,636
✟1,207,638.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Maybe we should try to run our federal legislative bodies less as a parliament, (where the party out of the White House acts as an opposition party) and get back to the consensus model that we had used for the first 200+ years?
That would require two parties interested in governing.
 
Upvote 0