• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

best easiest software to create website?

Jo1

Veteran
Nov 10, 2006
6,117
338
51
✟22,817.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi all i want to set up a website. I would like to include video files in it so people could look at film clips etc. aswell as pictures, sound.Could anyone advise me what is the easiest and best software to use so i can do this. The simpler the better really. I do have microsoft office 2000. I wouldnt be able to write programming im not technical like that. Thanks
 

raphink

Regular Member
Jan 12, 2005
609
13
42
Cannes
Visit site
✟15,805.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The idea of a CMS is good imo. It allows you to set a whole portal (home page, forums, wiki, gallery, blog, and about whatever modules you might want to add to your website).

CMS are not programs to make websites, they are dynamic websites that can be adapted to your needs with a backoffice interface.

http://www.opensourcecms.com lists open-source CMS. Wordpress (blog only), Joomla and Drupal are probably the most famous ones.

As of making a website yourself, I would recommend learning HTML/CSS/JavaScript and even some PHP and using a simple notepad program to fully understand what you're doing. Learning this and practicing on little websites will allow you to then add nice contents to CMS interfaces.
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,881
17,783
56
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟439,573.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Notepad.

HTML,CSS and php can be picked up in less than a week.
While yes notepad will work, it's sorta like using MS Paint to create art over Photoshop.
Yes you can use it & create great work, for the average user Photoshop will work better. The same with Web development. Yes you can create a masterpeace with notepad, the Average user can do better with a WYSIWYG editor then a text editor.



*
WYSIWYG = What You See Is What You Get (like Dreamweaver)
 
Upvote 0

raphink

Regular Member
Jan 12, 2005
609
13
42
Cannes
Visit site
✟15,805.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
While yes notepad will work, it's sorta like using MS Paint to create art over Photoshop.
Yes you can use it & create great work, for the average user Photoshop will work better. The same with Web development. Yes you can create a masterpeace with notepad, the Average user can do better with a WYSIWYG editor then a text editor.



*
WYSIWYG = What You See Is What You Get (like Dreamweaver)
I'm afraid I don't agree at all. Such horrible websites are created with programs like DreamWeaver, FrontPage and such... I wouldn't compare with Photoshop at all, because working on an image is not coding. Generated code is very often much more dirty than code written by hand. From my experience, WYSIWYG webpage generators tend to generate pages with lots of unused tags, absolute positionned divs all around, and are eventually only compatible with a few versions of some web browsers. I personally use Quanta, which is more of a web IDE with a WYSIWYG optional interface. I don't know any equivalent of it for Windows though...
 
Upvote 0

peanutbutter12

Senior Veteran
Oct 14, 2002
5,156
237
✟29,037.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Notepad.

HTML,CSS and php can be picked up in less than a week.
I find it amusing that the majority of people who say to use Notepad to build webpages never do themselves, nor do they know how.

I'm afraid I don't agree at all. Such horrible websites are created with programs like DreamWeaver, FrontPage and such... I wouldn't compare with Photoshop at all, because working on an image is not coding. Generated code is very often much more dirty than code written by hand. From my experience, WYSIWYG webpage generators tend to generate pages with lots of unused tags, absolute positionned divs all around, and are eventually only compatible with a few versions of some web browsers. I personally use Quanta, which is more of a web IDE with a WYSIWYG optional interface. I don't know any equivalent of it for Windows though...
I have to defend Dreamweaver as it's the most widely used among professional web designers and it also has very good code building so that the page doesn't end up a messy nightmare. Granted, you can mess anything up if you don't know how to use it properly, but after a little training, you can expertly build pages in a snap.

I'm actually very interested to see what DW9 is going to offer now that Adobe owns Macromedia and if Fireworks will be phased out in favor of Photoshop.

CJ
 
Upvote 0

Psalms34

◄♫♪♫ תהלים ♫♪♫►
Nov 20, 2004
5,745
391
Southern Calif
✟30,482.00
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Constitution
I can make a website with notepad, but it's not the easiest.

I agree with the CMS. Easiest one to install imo is Limbo which is a Mambo derivative. I like Wordpress the most and Mambo a close second. For forums, I like Simple Machines forum (SMF) and there is a bridge for SMF to WordPress and Mambo (so you can use the same accounts). It's easier than making a website if you keep it simple.
 
Upvote 0