- Jun 22, 2024
- 10
- 4
- 25
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Many if not most versions of this chapter talk about the difference between doing things because they are righteous and doing things because they will look righteous.
However, a question arises in my mind when we consider situations where there are shades of nuance between what is righteous and what is not righteous.
Suppose you did something good thinking it would make you look good but it ended up giving you infamy instead, or suppose you did something bad thinking it would give you infamy (maybe as a form of attack) only for it to give you good fame, or suppose you did something anticipating a specific mix of fame and infamy depending on the individual.
How does the teaching manifest in those cases?
However, a question arises in my mind when we consider situations where there are shades of nuance between what is righteous and what is not righteous.
Suppose you did something good thinking it would make you look good but it ended up giving you infamy instead, or suppose you did something bad thinking it would give you infamy (maybe as a form of attack) only for it to give you good fame, or suppose you did something anticipating a specific mix of fame and infamy depending on the individual.
How does the teaching manifest in those cases?