• With the events that occured on July 13th, 2024, a reminder that posts wishing that the attempt was successful will not be tolerated. Regardless of political affiliation, at no point is any type of post wishing death on someone is allowed and will be actioned appropriately by CF Staff.

  • Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Shouldn't all Evangelicals want Christian Nationalism?

FAITH-IN-HIM

Active Member
Aug 23, 2024
281
161
WI
✟10,230.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do you reject all worldly aspects of life? Do you reject marriage? Do you reject relationships? Do you reject being a parent? Do you reject friends?


Was the world made better or worse through Christians assuming it was their natural duty when they were called to excercise power? I would like to hear your opinion on this. Should all law, all power, all influence in society have been dominated by non-Christians so that it would only benefit them?



Where did Christ forbid Christians from being rulers? Are people with power the only people who should not become Christians? Why did Paul wish for the conversion of the King of Israel?

How would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning? If you're unable to deal with a simple hypothetical then conversation cannot continue since you are not capable of rational thought.

I apologize if this seems rude, but you want to promote “Christian nationalism.” However, I haven't seen you support your “Christian nationalism” with scripture and Biblical doctrine. I'm not interested in your opinion, my opinion, or anyone else's opinion; I'm only interested in what the Bible says. So far, you have not provided Biblical doctrine to support your view.
 
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Active Member
Aug 23, 2024
281
161
WI
✟10,230.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Oh so you're not capable of rational thought. Noted.

Christian doctrine and rational thought are often viewed as incompatible. According to the Gospels, God became human, was crucified, resurrected after three days, and thereby saved humanity. Do you find this to be an example of rational thinking?
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,135
4,322
✟329,695.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
It is a tension balance between having a good boundary, solid identity and reaching out to be salt in the world, evangelizing..
What's the tension? Individual liberty vs boundaries? I'm not convinced valuing individual liberty is at all is needed or good, especially as we see the secular world go it's own way and become ever more degenerate. All it does is allow for Christians to be manipulated into non-action and we are paralyzed at the mere thought of having our way of life extolled because that may impact someone's liberty. For the early Christians the solution was obvious, you expel the person who prefers their individual liberty which goes against the Church community until they repent.

Christians have valued the world over other Christians for long enough.
I mean "Christians" who do not medal Christian values in their own lives.


And I am talking from a specifically power point of view in terms of how Christianity is leveraged in politics, particularly American politics. It is appealed to all the time by the Republicans and even the Democrats, yet neither instantiates any Christian principles into their political actions by the laws and legislation they pass.

Modelling Christianity may be good, but if that isn't being done by the people with influence and power then society at large will remain unchanged.
I apologize if this seems rude, but you want to promote “Christian nationalism.” However, I haven't seen you support your “Christian nationalism” with scripture and Biblical doctrine. I'm not interested in your opinion, my opinion, or anyone else's opinion; I'm only interested in what the Bible says. So far, you have not provided Biblical doctrine to support your view.
I'm not supporting Christian Nationalism as a Christian Nationalist. Rather I am challenging the assumptions many Christians have regarding Christianity and power. If you have no response to any of my points, this conversation cannot continue.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,135
4,322
✟329,695.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Christian doctrine and rational thought are often viewed as incompatible. According to the Gospels, God became human, was crucified, resurrected after three days, and thereby saved humanity. Do you find this to be an example of rational thinking?
I don't think any of that is irrational. Do you believe Christianity is illogical and irrational?
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
38,633
27,990
Pacific Northwest
✟773,643.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
I think I just explained what made it wrong. It's arbitrary and exists solely for the purpose of doing harm to you.

You didn't explain why it being arbitrary and existing solely for the purpose of doing harm to me is wrong. Which is what I was asking.

Why is that wrong? What's wrong with arbitrary rules that exist solely to cause harm to someone? What makes that wrong?

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,135
4,322
✟329,695.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
You didn't explain why it being arbitrary and existing solely for the purpose of doing harm to me is wrong. Which is what I was asking.

Why is that wrong? What's wrong with arbitrary rules that exist solely to cause harm to someone? What makes that wrong?

-CryptoLutheran
For the purpose of law and order this should be a sufficient reason. Do you believe every law needs a deep philosophical justification?
 
Upvote 0

lifepsyop

Regular Member
Jan 23, 2014
2,227
656
✟85,256.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I apologize if this seems rude, but you want to promote “Christian nationalism.” However, I haven't seen you support your “Christian nationalism” with scripture and Biblical doctrine. I'm not interested in your opinion, my opinion, or anyone else's opinion; I'm only interested in what the Bible says. So far, you have not provided Biblical doctrine to support your view.

Most of Christian history is under various forms of Christian monarchy or otherwise a political state that officially endorsed Christianity. Even some of the United States were officially submitted to Jesus with state churches up through the 19th century.

You are living in an aberration of time. Can you use scripture or Biblical doctrine to support living in a modern liberal democracy where, say for example, the average school promotes homosexuality to children as healthy and normal?

The speck and the log in the eye come to mind here.
 
Upvote 0

lifepsyop

Regular Member
Jan 23, 2014
2,227
656
✟85,256.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I agree pretty much with everything you've said. I see no reason why the Apostles or the early Christians would be opposed to the development of an organic and natural Christian community which had sovereignty over itself. If Churches were to govern themselves and not rely on secular magistrates to settle disputes (as Paul wanted), then it makes little sense to me to suggest that Christians must be akin to dhimmis and naturally submit to the non-Christians around them even when they don't have to.

I think it is much to do with a hidden love of the secular order.... modernity, technological power, convenience... a global marketplace at your fingertips.... and along with it a global marketplace of ideas and identities that flowed unregulated into Christian households. Maybe that is the same spiritually as the comforts of Egypt which Israel preferred over the wilderness of faith? I really don't know, but you can look around for two seconds at the fruits of modern liberal democracy and the postwar consensus "open society", and you have to wonder why Christians living in them are so passionate to defend those institutions.

As we've discussed... this abhorrence with Christian nationalism or Christian monarchy, is not found anywhere in the pages of the Old or New Testaments, or most of Christian tradition. Yet modern Christians seem so sure of themselves that attacking it and defending modern liberal democracy is the hill to die on.
 
Upvote 0

Deborah1$

Active Member
Mar 11, 2024
57
26
73
Bowie
✟12,414.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Others
Of course you can't enforce faith. You could however have laws against blasphemy. A Christian society would not tolerate multi-billion dollar entertainment industries that regularly blaspheme and mock Jesus and Christians.

So, no, definitely not forcing people to be believers, but Yes to an official national recognition of Jesus as Lord over the nation state, and a general intolerance for any major atheistic or anti-Christian influencers in the public sphere.

It doesn't have to be forced. You can believe what you want as long as you don't publicly blaspheme. You would be told to keep it to yourselves or move to a non-Christian society.



More accurate to say that modern technology is one of the greatest mass distractions away from the Gospel. Internet search statistics reflect this.
What I foresee is millions of people (Jews, Muslims and other faiths) walking around like little monkeys with their hands over their mouths, afraid to speak because they might offend someone and then be sent into exile. I think earth is a training ground designed to teach us patience, compassion, love and charity towards those we don't particularly like or agree with. What you're proposing feels like a robotic society. Agree or be gone! Sheesh! I'd rather live in hut by myself. Uh Oh! I think I just blasphemed, so I'll now disappear.
 
Upvote 0

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
8,878
6,301
69
Midwest
✟325,707.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What's the tension? Individual liberty vs boundaries?
No, circling the wagons, being insular and protective like a monastery and reaching out, evangelizing, going out into the world.

I'm not convinced valuing individual liberty is at all is needed or good, especially as we see the secular world go it's own way and become ever more degenerate. All it does is allow for Christians to be manipulated into non-action and we are paralyzed at the mere thought of having our way of life extolled because that may impact someone's liberty. For the early Christians the solution was obvious, you expel the person who prefers their individual liberty which goes against the Church community until they repent.
Sine the enlightenment and reformation individual liberty has been an ongoing conflict with authority. And yet it need not be that way.
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is a universal maxim

Christians have valued the world over other Christians for long enough.


And I am talking from a specifically power point of view in terms of how Christianity is leveraged in politics, particularly American politics. It is appealed to all the time by the Republicans and even the Democrats, yet neither instantiates any Christian principles into their political actions by the laws and legislation they pass.
I think they do from time to time but you have to look for them and identify them. on another thread I sought to identify "Christian Principles" and Biblical values. Biblical Values what do you see lacking? Or whet do you have in mind.
Modelling Christianity may be good, but if that isn't being done by the people with influence and power then society at large will remain unchanged.
I completely agree. That is why we need to look at character in a candidate more so than proclaimed positions.
I'm not supporting Christian Nationalism as a Christian Nationalist. Rather I am challenging the assumptions many Christians have regarding Christianity and power. If you have no response to any of my points, this conversation cannot continue.
So you would like to see Christianity claim and assert more power?
 
Upvote 0

lifepsyop

Regular Member
Jan 23, 2014
2,227
656
✟85,256.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What I foresee is millions of people (Jews, Muslims and other faiths) walking around like little monkeys with their hands over their mouths, afraid to speak because they might offend someone and then be sent into exile.

Interesting that you say that because I wonder how many Christian men today, feel like their livelihoods and abilities to take care of their families will be stripped away from them if they speak out publicly concerning many politically incorrect parts of scripture. Being unable to feed your kids can be a fate worse than death for a father.

And, with Christian Nationalism, what I see is the local p*rnography distributor living in fear that he will be sent into exile. Teachers who really want to teach kids to embrace homosexuality but they are in fear that they'll lose their jobs for promoting indecency.

In a Christian nation, nobody is going to force anyone to accept the Gospel. The apostle Paul taught us to shake the dust off and move on.

But people will live in fear of promoting degeneracy. That would be a good thing, right?
 
Upvote 0

Deborah1$

Active Member
Mar 11, 2024
57
26
73
Bowie
✟12,414.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Others
Interesting that you say that because I wonder how many Christian men today, feel like their livelihoods and abilities to take care of their families will be stripped away from them if they speak out publicly concerning many politically incorrect parts of scripture. Being unable to feed your kids can be a fate worse than death for a father.

And, with Christian Nationalism, what I see is the local p*rnography distributor living in fear that he will be sent into exile. Teachers who really want to teach kids to embrace homosexuality but they are in fear that they'll lose their jobs for promoting indecency.

In a Christian nation, nobody is going to force anyone to accept the Gospel. The apostle Paul taught us to shake the dust off and move on.

But people will live in fear of promoting degeneracy. That would be a good thing, right?
You said in a previous post "Keep their opinions to themselves or be sent to a non-Christian nation... something to that affect. How domineering is that? People walking around afraid of censorship. I'm not talking pornography, nor homosexuality. You want a society devoid of any opposing thoughts other than your version of Christianity (and let's admit there are a thousand versions of Christianity - look at all the denominations). What's next? One national denomination? What you're proposing is control..... i.e., power and manipulation and you can say it 50 different ways, but that's what it is. Has our society gotten morally pathetic and degenerate? Has our society lost fundamental values? No one can deny that. But forcing people to either walk in lock-step to someone else's views or be banished doesn't work.

Our views are out of sync, and my purpose on this board has never been to "debate" anyone on Christianity. I desire to have intelligent answers to questions regarding scripture that I have doubts about. Kinda sorry I dropped by this forum. I'm not going to carry on this conversation any further, but since you're my brother in Christ, I send you blessings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: john23237
Upvote 0

lifepsyop

Regular Member
Jan 23, 2014
2,227
656
✟85,256.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You said in a previous post "Keep their opinions to themselves or be sent to a non-Christian nation... something to that affect. How domineering is that?

That was specifically in reference to publicly blaspheming Jesus' name. That's much different than trying to force belief on someone. Yes, I think people are always free to go to a non-Christian nation if they feel the need to blaspheme Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,135
4,322
✟329,695.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
No, circling the wagons, being insular and protective like a monastery and reaching out, evangelizing, going out into the world.
Being insular and protective is probably the only way to grow the Christian community at present. One should be welcoming of those who want to join but Christian communities would be far stronger if they acted like the early Church did. They would draw more people in this nihilistic society and give them purpose, rules and a community to strive to fit into. The current model of Church in the West is extraordinarily passive and weak and it's no wonder no one wants to join a community which requires little from them.
Sine the enlightenment and reformation individual liberty has been an ongoing conflict with authority. And yet it need not be that way.
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is a universal maxim
If we are going to interpret that along libertarian lines that we should all the freedom to do things which weaken the Idea of the Christian society then we will lose out. If Christians just want to be left alone, they will be dominated by the group that doesn't want to just leave them alone.
I think they do from time to time but you have to look for them and identify them. on another thread I sought to identify "Christian Principles" and Biblical values. Biblical Values what do you see lacking? Or whet do you have in mind.

What I have in mind is abandoning this idea of conforming Christianity to secularism. Americans particularly are guilty of this because they have been so influenced and developed by Ideas, not the Ideas of their founders who were not as secular as modern Americans today, but a modern interpretation of the constitution which implies a total secularism and individual freedom. Christians if we're at all serious would do well to value our Christianity first and not conform it to the dominant law of the land. This will mean setting oneself against said law and I don't mean in a way in which you have to foster violent revolution, but I mean in the way the early Christians set themselves against Rome. Rome was the enemy but when Rome became the friend Christians used it and quite effectively for Christian purposes.
I completely agree. That is why we need to look at character in a candidate more so than proclaimed positions.

You could have the most wholesome chungus candidate ever but the system itself will react and the immune defenses of the managerial state will prevent any President from making effective change. It's what happened to Trump and as Biden has demonstrate the system can largely run on it's own without the involvement of the President. A strong executive, a monarchical executive like FDR is what is needed for complete system change.

So you would like to see Christianity claim and assert more power?
Yes because power is a natural aspect of the world, from the moment we are born power is put on us and shapes us. By parents, by teachers, by police, by laws, by governments. If Christians are going to abandon said influence and retreat into pacifism, which is what many here have argued then they cannot complain about the state of things as Christianity goes into decline. In fact they are enabling it by refusing to combat evil. Christian standards in law and society are retracting and a new non-Christian western civilization is developing. We're pretty much there at this point and the non-Christian civilization is insane.

It's like Lifypsyop said, most here seem to prefer the current system and think that a genuinely Christian society would be worse. Well the current system relies on that notion and loves it, because it will continue to go it's own way unchallenged.
 
Upvote 0

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
8,878
6,301
69
Midwest
✟325,707.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Being insular and protective is probably the only way to grow the Christian community at present. One should be welcoming of those who want to join but Christian communities would be far stronger if they acted like the early Church did. They would draw more people in this nihilistic society and give them purpose, rules and a community to strive to fit into. The current model of Church in the West is extraordinarily passive and weak and it's no wonder no one wants to join a community which requires little from them.
Also irrelevant.
What I have in mind is abandoning this idea of conforming Christianity to secularism. Americans particularly are guilty of this because they have been so influenced and developed by Ideas, not the Ideas of their founders who were not as secular as modern Americans today, but a modern interpretation of the constitution which implies a total secularism and individual freedom. Christians if we're at all serious would do well to value our Christianity first and not conform it to the dominant law of the land. This will mean setting oneself against said law and I don't mean in a way in which you have to foster violent revolution, but I mean in the way the early Christians set themselves against Rome. Rome was the enemy but when Rome became the friend Christians used it and quite effectively for Christian purposes.
What specific "Christioan" laws would you like to see?
Yes because power is a natural aspect of the world, from the moment we are born power is put on us and shapes us. By parents, by teachers, by police, by laws, by governments. If Christians are going to abandon said influence and retreat into pacifism, which is what many here have argued then they cannot complain about the state of things as Christianity goes into decline. In fact they are enabling it by refusing to combat evil. Christian standards in law and society are retracting and a new non-Christian western civilization is developing. We're pretty much there at this point and the non-Christian civilization is insane.
But if we follow the example of Jesus who humbled himself, gave up his "power", identified with the vulnerable, accepted maltreatment would we not be more faithful to him and his teaching?
It's like Lifypsyop said, most here seem to prefer the current system and think that a genuinely Christian society would be worse. Well the current system relies on that notion and loves it, because it will continue to go it's own way unchallenged.
That is why Jesus is so disturbing, radical, dangerous, subversive. He is not about Earthly power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FAITH-IN-HIM
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,135
4,322
✟329,695.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Also irrelevant.
No, how Christians operate and consider themselves in society matters. If the early Christians had our attitudes today towards Rome, they would have been easily assimilated.
What specific "Christioan" laws would you like to see?
How about only recognizing man woman marriage and banning pornography? We can agree on that right?
But if we follow the example of Jesus who humbled himself, gave up his "power", identified with the vulnerable, accepted maltreatment would we not be more faithful to him and his teaching?
This assumes that it is the duty of all Christians to give up their earthly power. Should the emperors of East Rome have simply surrendered their earthly power to the Sultan's when they invaded?
That is why Jesus is so disturbing, radical, dangerous, subversive. He is not about Earthly power.
Are we all called to live lives exactly like our Lord's? We aren't called to be Mothers and Fathers? We aren't called to have communities? How far do we have to go? Or is it only with regards to political power? Why only the latter?
 
Upvote 0

lifepsyop

Regular Member
Jan 23, 2014
2,227
656
✟85,256.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yes because power is a natural aspect of the world, from the moment we are born power is put on us and shapes us. By parents, by teachers, by police, by laws, by governments. If Christians are going to abandon said influence and retreat into pacifism, which is what many here have argued then they cannot complain about the state of things as Christianity goes into decline. In fact they are enabling it by refusing to combat evil. Christian standards in law and society are retracting and a new non-Christian western civilization is developing. We're pretty much there at this point and the non-Christian civilization is insane.

truth.
 
Upvote 0

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
8,878
6,301
69
Midwest
✟325,707.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
No, how Christians operate and consider themselves in society matters. If the early Christians had our attitudes today towards Rome, they would have been easily assimilated.
They ended up being assimilated. "Christianity" was assimilated. As it is now.
How about only recognizing man woman marriage and banning pornography? We can agree on that right?
Definitely pornography as there are existing standards. We talked about that before. Marriage? or How do you feel about legal Same sex unions?
This assumes that it is the duty of all Christians to give up their earthly power. Should the emperors of East Rome have simply surrendered their earthly power to the Sultan's when they invaded?

Are we all called to live lives exactly like our Lord's? We aren't called to be Mothers and Fathers? We aren't called to have communities? How far do we have to go? Or is it only with regards to political power? Why only the latter?
Ya, i went too far. We have a role in the secular world.
 
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Active Member
Aug 23, 2024
281
161
WI
✟10,230.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What's the tension? Individual liberty vs boundaries? I'm not convinced valuing individual liberty is at all is needed or good, especially as we see the secular world go it's own way and become ever more degenerate. All it does is allow for Christians to be manipulated into non-action and we are paralyzed at the mere thought of having our way of life extolled because that may impact someone's liberty. For the early Christians the solution was obvious, you expel the person who prefers their individual liberty which goes against the Church community until they repent.

Christians have valued the world over other Christians for long enough.


And I am talking from a specifically power point of view in terms of how Christianity is leveraged in politics, particularly American politics. It is appealed to all the time by the Republicans and even the Democrats, yet neither instantiates any Christian principles into their political actions by the laws and legislation they pass.

Modelling Christianity may be good, but if that isn't being done by the people with influence and power then society at large will remain unchanged.

I'm not supporting Christian Nationalism as a Christian Nationalist. Rather I am challenging the assumptions many Christians have regarding Christianity and power. If you have no response to any of my points, this conversation cannot continue.

When questioning Christian about power, cite scripture and support it with a Biblical doctrine. There is no point in continuing this discussion if you cannot provide a Bible verse. I am not interested in personal opinions or interpretations, only in principles rooted in the Bible.

I observed that your post focuses on positive points but does not include Bible verses. As someone who identifies as Christian and advocates for a Christian nation, it is surprising to see the absence of God's Word, which is fundamental for Christians, in your discussion.
 
Upvote 0