No, circling the wagons, being insular and protective like a monastery and reaching out, evangelizing, going out into the world.
Being insular and protective is probably the only way to grow the Christian community at present. One should be welcoming of those who want to join but Christian communities would be far stronger if they acted like the early Church did. They would draw more people in this nihilistic society and give them purpose, rules and a community to strive to fit into. The current model of Church in the West is extraordinarily passive and weak and it's no wonder no one wants to join a community which requires little from them.
Sine the enlightenment and reformation individual liberty has been an ongoing conflict with authority. And yet it need not be that way.
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is a universal maxim
If we are going to interpret that along libertarian lines that we should all the freedom to do things which weaken the Idea of the Christian society then we will lose out. If Christians just want to be left alone, they will be dominated by the group that doesn't want to just leave them alone.
I think they do from time to time but you have to look for them and identify them. on another thread I sought to identify "Christian Principles" and Biblical values.
Biblical Values what do you see lacking? Or whet do you have in mind.
What I have in mind is abandoning this idea of conforming Christianity to secularism. Americans particularly are guilty of this because they have been so influenced and developed by Ideas, not the Ideas of their founders who were not as secular as modern Americans today, but a modern interpretation of the constitution which implies a total secularism and individual freedom. Christians if we're at all serious would do well to value our Christianity first and not conform it to the dominant law of the land. This will mean setting oneself against said law and I don't mean in a way in which you have to foster violent revolution, but I mean in the way the early Christians set themselves against Rome. Rome was the enemy but when Rome became the friend Christians used it and quite effectively for Christian purposes.
I completely agree. That is why we need to look at character in a candidate more so than proclaimed positions.
You could have the most wholesome chungus candidate ever but the system itself will react and the immune defenses of the managerial state will prevent any President from making effective change. It's what happened to Trump and as Biden has demonstrate the system can largely run on it's own without the involvement of the President. A strong executive, a monarchical executive like FDR is what is needed for complete system change.
So you would like to see Christianity claim and assert more power?
Yes because power is a natural aspect of the world, from the moment we are born power is put on us and shapes us. By parents, by teachers, by police, by laws, by governments. If Christians are going to abandon said influence and retreat into pacifism, which is what many here have argued then they cannot complain about the state of things as Christianity goes into decline. In fact they are enabling it by refusing to combat evil. Christian standards in law and society are retracting and a new non-Christian western civilization is developing. We're pretty much there at this point and the non-Christian civilization is insane.
It's like Lifypsyop said, most here seem to prefer the current system and think that a genuinely Christian society would be worse. Well the current system relies on that notion and loves it, because it will continue to go it's own way unchallenged.