That is false.
Adam was the first Man...
1 Corinthians 15:45
"And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit."
First doesn't mean only. Just FYI.
It is the same creation account overall. Genesis 2 fills in missing details.
Just an FYI...
There are no contradictions in the account.
While I don't view the accounts as contradictions, if one takes the accounts completely literally there is actually a significant contradiction. Let's take a gander shall we?
"And God said, 'Let the earth sprout vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fuit in which is their seed, each according to its kind, on the earth' And it was so. The earth brought forth vegetation, plants, yielding seed according to its own kinds, and trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, the third day." - Genesis 1:11-13
"When no bush of the field was yet in the earth, and no small plant of the field had yet sprung up--for the LORD God had not yet caused it to rain on the land, and there was no man to work the ground, and a mist was going up from the earth and was watering the whole face of the ground--then the LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into His nostrils the breath of life, and the man become a living creature. And the LORD God planted a garden in Eden, in the east, and there He put the man whom He had formed. And out of the ground the LORD God made to spring up every tree that is pleasant in the sight and good for food. The tree of life was in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil." - Genesis 2:5-9
Was man created before or after plants sprung up from the earth?
If you want to take this all as a singular, literal account, this is clearly a contradiction. Now, you might not like that, you might be offended that I'd say that. But you can't ignore what the Bible actually says.
Now, I--and most Christians--don't take this to be a singular, literal account. So this isn't a problem for us. We still fully accept this as the fully infallible word of God, free of error. We just don't understand it literally as you do.
Now, as I was raised a Young Earth Creationist, I already know the standard YEC explanation: Plants were created on day 3, but didn't grow until after day 6. The problem with this, of course, is that it clearly contradicts the Scriptures, which say that on the 3rd day the plants sprung forth from the earth.
Again, this is really only a problem for hyper-literalist Young Earth Creationists. It's not a problem for most Christians, and never has been.
Genesis 1 teaches of the creation of the Second Adam and his wife Eve.
It does? Where is the first Adam in Genesis 1? Because if I recall correctly, according to St. Paul the Holy Apostle, Jesus Christ is the Second Adam. Perhaps you got confused and meant to say something else?
Incorrect. God made Ishshah (Woman), *not* Eve, from the Rib.
Interesting.
"The man called his wife's name Eve, because she was the mother of all living. And the LORD God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them." - Genesis 3:20-21
So where did Eve come from?
Nope. All of the information is there for those willing to take the time and learn it.
You must be one of those "read between the lines" sort of people, who instead of taking what the Bible says, add whatever you want to the text.
That's not how I do things. I don't make a mockery of the Bible, instead I choose to take it seriously.
Your assumptions, opinion and methodology of interpretation are causing you to teach errors and falsehoods.
Oh? Perhaps you could elaborate.
-CryptoLutheran