I know more than you do. Look at the history of lactose tolerance in humans.
How do mutations add up?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I know more than you do. Look at the history of lactose tolerance in humans.
How do mutations add up?
Look at the history of lactose tolerance in humans.
Thats when a BAD mutation happens and switches off a gene. Mankind continues to de-evolve.
Perhaps ypu'll show us how mutations add up.
Thats when a BAD mutation happens and switches off a gene. Mankind continues to de-evolve.
Do all diest respond in such a nasty mean manner? Once an evo resorts to ad-homs..I know I've won and they can't answer the question.
Please put away your crayons and coloring book.
Now, please close your coloring bokk and show how mutatons add up.
Ahhhhhhhhh, where? In your coloring book?
So put away your crayons. Close your coloring book and show how mutations add up.
Are you indicating that mutations don't have to add up in a fish's progeny to turn a fin into a leg...then a leg in to a flipper? Come on my evo-friend...you really must do better.
Those that believe in evolutionism say trends evolve in small steps. It's a gradual process that takes a long time.I have no idea what you mean by this. You appear to have conjured up a phrase in your imagination (along with "evolutionism") and now are repeating it like a mantra when it means nothing to anyone but you.
Perhaps if you clarified what you mean by "mutations add(ing) up"? Because I'm not sure if you mean particular mutations in particular lineages or how mutations function or what. I'll read back to see if I can discern what you mean by that phrase, but if you could succinctly clarify, I'd appreciate it.
Perhaps you should pay more attention to the subject and less time trying to "win".
Discovery reveals evolutionary path from fins to fingers
Sorry I don't have the time or the patience to put up with this nonsense today. When you can grow up and use proper verbiage, then we can talk.
Have you ever read Isaiah 53? It's about what we're celebrating today. It was written in 740 BC. Long before Jesus incarnated. Guess what? It happened as written around 30 AD.
That's just one peice of proof out of many for my faith.
Yet as an atheist...you must deny it.
Shot, score....I see my post left you speechless. I didn't think you had the ability to respond to it.
EOLUTIONISM FAILS.
I do find it ironic how none of you who have such a great faith in evolutionism can explain how mutations add up.
Thank you for answering my question in such an understandable and simplistic way, I am proof that God doesn't call many wise!danstribe, I tend to see it this way....
Currently they are many different kinds of primates...all are knuckle walkers or jump from branch to branch while there is only 1 (one) that really walks up-right...humans.
Why is that?
According to the evo theories adaptive radiation among species occurs as they evolve. This adaptive radiation produces cousins....so to speak... that are very similar to each other. The evos point to the cats as example of adaptive radiation with the different varieties. Varieties such as tigers, leopards, cheeta, jaguar etc...all of which are said to be closely related. All of which are still extant.
According to the evos, like the cats, the variety of so-called not too distantly removed animal species “cousins” have happened with just about every genera...except man.
Man has no close extant relatives such as the cats and many other highly successful species currently do.
It appears that man’s branch on the tree has no offshoots, not even a twig.... no signs of adaptive radiation...WERE ALONE!
So I ask those that believe in evolutionism...where are our up-right walking cousins? Why is our closest so called cousin still a knuckle dragging chimp?
Now considering man has been so successful..you know, with his newly found hands to make tools, bigger brain, speech and so on, you would think that his family tree would have a few close branches representing his “cousins” adaptively radiating from it. BUT IT DOESN'T. Apparently this success meant extinction for man’s cousins...despite ALL the evolutionary models that say there should be other successful up-right walkers still around.
Of all of the claimed pre-humans in our so-called evolutionary linage, a few of them should have evolved through a similar but different branch and still be with us. The branch radiating out with one limb becoming human and the other some closely related human like animal.
You might be able to point to some fragmented skull and say, look here's a potential off shoot, buts that's about all she wrote. They stopped dead. Despite mans newly found hands to make tools, bigger brain, speech and so on.
It appears that mans branch on the tree has no successful offshoots, not even a twig.... no signs of adaptive radiation...WERE ALONE!
So I ask those that believe in evolutionism...where are our up-right walking cousins? Why is our closest so called cousin still a knuckle dragging chimp?
I've been arguing with him in forums like this on and off for twenty years. He has been well known in them for longer than that.